Question Description
PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice PassageRoughly 40 per cent of the African American population of the Southern United States left the South between 1915 and 1960, primarily for the industrial cities of the North. While there was some African American migration to the North during the nineteenth century, most accounts point to 1915 as the start of what historians call the Great Migration. There were at least three catalysts of the Great Migration. First, World War I increased labour demand in the industrial North. Second, the war in Europe cut off immigration, which led many Northern employers to send labour agents to recruit African American labour in the South. Finally, a boll weevil infestation ruined cotton crops and reduced labour demand in much of the South in the 1910s and 1920s.In short, the Great Migration began in 1915 and not earlier, because it was only then that the North-South income gap became large enough to start such a large-scale migration. Less clear, however, is why migration continued and even accelerated, in subsequent decades, at the same time that North-South income differences were narrowing.We propose that once started, migration develops momentum over time as current migration reduces the difficulty and cost of future migration. Economists have typically assumed that people migrate if their expected earnings in the destination exceed those of the origin enough to outweigh the difficulties and one-time costs of migration. Previous research suggests that the difficulties and costs arise from several sources. First, the uncertainty that potential migrants face concerning housing and labour-market conditions in the destination presents a significant hindrance. Second, there is a simple cost in terms of time and money of physically moving from the origin to the destination. Third, new migrants must familiarize themselves with local labour- and housing-market institutions once they arrive; they must find housing and work, and they must often adapt to a new culture or language.Empirical studies show that during the Great Migration, information was passed through letters that were often read by dozens of people and through conversation when migrants made trips back to their home communities. Thus early migrants provided information about labor- and housing-market conditions to friends and relatives who had not yet made the trip. First-time African American migrants often travelled with earlier migrants returning to the North after a visit to the South, which reduced physical costs. Additionally, previous migrants reduced new migrants cost of adapting to a new locale and culture by providing them with temporary housing, food, and even credit. Previous migrants also provided a cultural cushion for later migrants, so that they did not have to struggle as hard with their new surroundings.Q.The authors of the passage would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?a)Expected financial gains alone may not be a reliable indicator of the likelihood that an individual will migrate.b)A complete explanation of the Great Migration must begin with an account of what triggered nineteenth-century migrations to the North.c)The Great Migration is not parallel in its broadest patterns to most other known migration movements.d)Most large-scale migrations can be adequately explained in terms of the movement of people from lower- to higher-income regions.e)Large-scale migrations generally did not occur until the early twentieth century, when significant interregional income differences arose as a result of rapid industrialization.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.