GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by No... Start Learning for Free
The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would. 
Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?
  • a)
    The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutions
  • b)
    They are profitable models of social business.
  • c)
    They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.
  • d)
    Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.
  • e)
    Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate,...
Passage Analysis
Summary and Main Point   
 
 
This is a Specific Inference question. We need to go back to refresh our understanding of the referred entity and look for an answer choice that matches our understanding. We know from the passage that these for-profit institutions:
  1. misunderstood the GB model (profit first, development on the side)
  2. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process.
  3. (some of them) charge significantly more interest rate on zero collateral loans than Grameen would
  4. profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.
 
With this understanding in mind, let’s evaluate the answer choices.
Answer Choices
A
The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutions
Correct
This choice matches the first point in our pre-thinking.  
B
They are profitable models of social business.
Incorrect: Opposite
The passage clearly states that a social business is one whose main focus is development and not profit. And we know that these for-profit organizations are first concerned with profit. So this choice goes against our understanding of the information given in the passage.
C
They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.
Incorrect: Inconsistent
Yes, these organizations misunderstood the GB model and hence were responsible for its failure in countries outside SE Asia. However, the GB model was very successful in SE Asia. But this choice states that GB model was a complete failure.
D
Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.
Incorrect: Out of Scope
There is no given information to conclude that these institutions are only operational in countries outside SE Asia.
E
Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.
Incorrect: Opposite
This information goes against the information given in the passage that states that such institutions charge high interest rates on loans given against zero collateral security. 
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameens goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.According to the passage, which one of the following statements is true?

The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameens goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which of the following best captures the main idea of the passage?

It is impossible to describe the arts in the United States without reference to our extraordinary ethnic and cultural diversity, but recognition of the full spectrum of different traditions has been slow in coming. The story of the realization of Americas extraordinary artistic diversity can be told in three chapters, culminating in the fairly recent proliferation of cultural centers of color, and demonstrates that art, like life, can flourish in many different settings.The settlement houses of the late 1800s, supported by private philanthropy and founded to provide artistic training, produce performances, and mount exhibitions, were designed to address the needs of poor European immigrants. As the communities in which settlement houses were located changed, so did their constituencies; and most of these organizations now serve communities of color. The oldest and best known, Hull House in Chicago, serves one of the countrys largest multiethnic communities with immigrants from Asia, Latin America, Africa, and other parts of the world.In the 1930s, a variety of visual, performing, and literary arts projects were initiated under the aegis of the Works Progress Administration and aimed not only at providing employment for artists but at generally encouraging a wide range of cultural expression. The achievements of these programs were substantial. The Negro Unit of the Federal Theater Project employed some 500 blacks in New York and produced dramas focusing on Nat Turner, Harriet Tubman, and Pierre Toussaint. The Federal Music Project featured all-black opera casts and preserved, recorded, and published Negro folk music, and thousands of African-Americans attended art classes funded by the Project in the South Side Community Art Center in Chicago and at the Harlem Art Center.The 1960s saw a grassroots movement among artists of color, when an unprecedented number of college-trained artists of color who possessed an understanding of the art forms of the larger society as well as those of their own communities, and who were tired of being rejected or stereotyped by established arts institutions, began to create informal groups and networks. They experimented with new artistic forms, often interdisciplinary, ethnocentric productions, in the process developing new audiences for the arts. The country was also in the throes of a cultural upheaval in which established models were challenged by young people from all racial, ethnic, and economic groups. Many of the cultural institutions established during this period, such as the Free Southern Theater of the Student nonviolent Coordinating Committee and El Teatro Campesino of the United Farmworkers, were integral parts of the civil rights struggle. The mood of activism, experimentation, and optimism was not limited to artists of color, but it was in this cultural ferment that the concept of nonprofit, community-based, ethnically specific organizations of color took root.Many of the "culturally elite" regarded these efforts with skepticism because these "radical artists" attacked the prevailing view that tended to rate cultures and their aesthetics strictly by European standards. But the result was not the devaluation of one experience at the expense of another. Rather, ethnically specific arts organizations, by preserving and sharing their own cultural heritages, promoted the unique cultural and artistic pluralism of the United States.Q. According to the passage, all of the following are true of the artists of color who worked during the 1960s EXCEPT

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Shortly after September 11, 2001, the United States began requesting additional financial information about persons of interest by subpoenaing records located at the SWIFT banking consortium. SWIFT, which routes trillions of dollars a day, faced an ethical dilemma: fight the subpoenas in order to protect member privacy and the groups reputation for the highest level of confidentiality, or, comply and provide information about thousands of financial communications in the hope that lives will be saved. SWIFT decided to comply in secret, but in late June 2006, four major U.S. newspapers disclosed SWIFTs compliance. This sparked a heated public debate over the ethics of SWIFTs decision to reveal ostensibly confidential financial communications.Analyzing the situation in hindsight, three ethical justifications existed for not complying with the Treasury Departments requests. First, SWIFT needed to uphold its long-standing values of confidentiality, non-disclosure, and institutional trust. The second ethical reason against SWIFTs involvement came with inadequate government oversight as the Treasury Department failed to construct necessary safeguards to ensure the privacy of the data. Third, international law must be upheld and one could argue quite strongly that the governments use of data breached some parts of international law.Although SWIFT executives undoubtedly considered the aforementioned reasons for rejecting the governments subpoena, three ethical justifications for complying existed. First, it could be argued that the program was legal because the United States government possesses the authority to subpoena records stored within its territory and SWIFT maintained many of its records in Virginia. Second, it is entirely possible that complying with the governments subpoena thwarted another catastrophic terrorist attack that would have cost lives and dollars. Third, cooperating with the government did not explicitly violate any SWIFT policies due to the presence of a valid subpoena. However, the extent of cooperation certainly surprised many financial institutions and sparked some outrage and debate within the financial community.While SWIFT had compelling arguments both for agreeing and refusing to cooperate with the U.S. government program, even in hindsight, it is impossible to judge with certitude the wisdom and ethics of SWIFTs decision to cooperate as we still lack answers to important questions such as: what information did the government want? What promises did the government make about data confidentially? What, if any, potentially impending threats did the government present to justify its need for data?Q.The author suggests which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion of an analysis of the ethics of SWIFTs decision?

Top Courses for GMAT

The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The Grameen Bank, founded in Bangladesh by Nobel Peace Prize Laureate, Dr. Muhammad Yunus, who is also credited for giving life to the concept of microcredit/microfinance, is one of the most popular models of social business, a business that operates primarily for addressing social needs and not for-profit. Based on the concept of microfinance, Grameen provides microloans, small loans, to the poor and those living beyond the reach of traditional finance, in order to promote income generating activities, avoiding the more traditional form of poverty alleviation - aid donations. The original focus of the Grameen Bank was on rural people with no credit history and no collateral. However, the bank rapidly expanded, giving the illusion of a win-win situation that yielded both profits for Grameen Bank and huge improvements in development for Bangladesh. Private, for-profit organizations around the world wrongly judged the situation, thinking that they could first and foremost profit from this type of venture while developing the country in the process. This view was indeed tainted since Grameen’s goal was development and any profits were an added bonus. Because of these wrong expectations, the Grameen model has achieved limited success in countries other than those in South-East Asia, though the concept of microfinance has had better luck, with many countries now running profitable microfinance institutions that typically charge considerably higher interest rates for zero collateral loans than Grameen ever would.Which one of the following statements can be inferred about the for-profit microfinance institutions?a)The coexistence of profit and development under the Grameen model was not interpreted correctly by such institutionsb)They are profitable models of social business.c)They were responsible for the complete failure of Grameen as a model of microfinance.d)Such institutions are not operational in Bangladesh.e)Such institutions are not likely to offer loans to applicants who do not have any collateral security to offer.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev