Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Banking Exams Exam > Banking Exams Questions > Recently in June India and ____________ sign...

Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.

a)
Israel
b)
Japan
c)
Senegal
d)
Hungry
e)
None of these

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengt...

India and Israel resolved to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties during the talks between Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and his counterpart Benjamin Gantz.
The two sides also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.
Besides reviewing the regional security scenario and the situation in Ukraine and the Gulf region, the two ministers also deliberated on the co-development and co-production of military equipment in sync with growing India-Israel strategic ties.
Israel has emerged as one of the major defense equipment exporters to India since diplomatic ties were established between the two nations 30 years ago.

Answered by Notes Wala · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Similar Banking Exams Doubts

Directions :Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them.The uneventful visit of the Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani to New Delhi last month has further strengthened the widespread belief that India is losing strategic influence and geopolitical standing as far as its northwestern frontier is concerned, especially Iran and Afghanistan. Just a year ago, during the Karzai presidency, India was the “most favoured nation” in Afghanistan. Today, there is aperceptiblechange in the new Afghan government’s attitude towards India. For instance, no major agreements were signed during Mr. Ghani’s visit and the India-Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement of 2011, hardly figured in the agenda. Indeed, India’s new northwestern strategic environment, in which the relegation of the Indo-Afghan strategic partnership is merely one element, is undergoing a grand geopolitical transformation, but New Delhi seems to be clueless about how to engage with it. Moreover, it is worrisome that while the mostformidablechallenges to India’s national security invariably originate from its northwestern frontiers, both historically and presently, the focus of the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government has primarily been on the global stage and the country’s southern and eastern neighbours.The most important element of the new strategic landscape in Southern Asia is the ongoing withdrawal of the United States from Afghanistan and the resultant power vacuum, as well as the subsequent rebalancing of forces in the region. China has begun the process of filling the post-American power vacuum, albeit without military involvement for the moment. The withdrawal by the U.S. and the attendant strategic uncertainty could also provide a favourable environment for forces like the Taliban and the Islamic State (IS) to enhance their influence in the region. This clearly worries Kabul. Given the American withdrawal and India’s unwillingness to involve itself militarily in Afghanistan, Mr. Ghani is left with no choice but to engage both Pakistan and China. Moreover, he realises that Beijing is perhaps the only actor today that has some traction in Islamabad. It is this that has led to a flurry of activity among the three countries. On the one hand, China is enhancing its influence in the region with the unveiling of itsinnovative‘New Silk Road’ strategy and by offering economic and developmental assistance to Pakistan, while on the other Beijing is also increasingly engaged in regional “conflict management” initiatives by mediating between Kabul and the Taliban, and organising trilateral strategic engagements with Afghanistan and Pakistan. In November 2014, for instance, representatives of the Taliban from its Doha-based office met in Beijing for talks. In February this year, China’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Liu Jianchao, Pakistan’s Foreign Secretary Aizaz Chaudhry, and the Afghan Deputy Foreign Minister, Hekmat Karzai, met in Kabul for the inaugural round of a new trilateral strategic dialogue. New Delhi has been disappointingly quiet in the face of these strategically significant developments, unable and unwilling to contribute towards stabilising the region.The second significant component is the newfound warmth between Kabul and Islamabad. Abandoning the trend of public spats, they are now on a path of cooperation and friendship, or so it seems. Immediately after assuming office, Mr. Ghani signalled a desire forreconciliationwith Islamabad and Rawalpindi. In his September 2014 “five-circle” foreign policy speech, not only did he place Pakistan in the first circle of countries that are most important to Afghanistan (with India in the fourth circl e), but also took the unprecedented step of visiting the Pakistan Army’s headquarters in Rawalpindi, a gesture signifying the deep policy changes under way in Kabul. Pakistan has also been making efforts to strengthen its relationship with Afghanistan; its Army and the intelligence chiefs have already visited Kabul to discuss joint counter-terrorism measures and to enhance the fight against terror. More importantly, given Chinese concerns about terrorism and its increasing influence on its borderlands, the Af-Pak rapprochement will most likely be superintended by China. While this in itself need not concern New Delhi, Islamabad is deeply suspicious of any cooperation between India and Afghanistan. Therefore, the worry in New Delhi that the Af-Pakrapprochementcould have zero-sum implications for India is indeed a legitimate one.The third major driver is the mainstreamingof radical Islamist terrorism in the form of the rise of the IS and the resurgence of the Taliban. While the West Asian region is currently the hotbed of Islamist terrorism, the Southern Asian region would not only be a potential target of such forces but also a fertile breeding ground. There are already reports of growing support for the IS in the region and its focus there. The IS has reportedly made some inroads into Pakistan and some Pakistan-based terror outfits have offered their allegiance to the organisation. While there may not be any ideological unity among them, the IS has the dangerous potential of providing a “wave of the future call” to the disparate terror outfits in the region. The IS has also been making recruitments from India; the speech by its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, in July last year specifically referred to the “atrocities against Muslims in Kashmir”. For India in particular, the potential resurgence of the Taliban and the rise of the IS have dangerous implications. The belief, in this context, that by merely strengthening its borders, India would be able to survive the scourge of terrorism is a mistaken one.Q. What is the synonym of the word “innovative”?

View answer

The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.How can the Indian Navy’s partnership with France benefit India?(i) It will help India resolve its border disputes with China(ii) It will strengthen our presence in the Indian Ocean Region(iii) It will provide India with an alternate option to Russia as a security partner

View answer

The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which option would best fill the blank given in the statement above in the passage?

View answer

The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.What were the repercussions of the US increasing its military presence in the discussed area?

View answer

The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Why couldn’t the Australia and France defense deal come to fruition?

View answer

Top Courses for Banking ExamsView all

Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Tips & Tricks for Government Exams

Improve Your Calculations: Vedic Maths (English)

Top Courses for Banking Exams

View all

Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2025 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Recently in June India and ____________ signed MOU to further strengthen their defense and strategic ties and also adopted a ‘vision statement’ to expand their defense and military cooperation.a)Israelb)Japanc)Senegald)Hungrye)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.

Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam