Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.India emerged honourably from the Glasgow climate summit. We incurred the wrath of the West by disallowing the dramatic abolition of coal. Given the compulsions of our power supply, we could hardly undertake more than 'phasing down', rather than 'phasing out', its use. Can India, then, hope for an environmentally secure future? It is a question of brute logic. Human intervention has depleted and destabilized nature. Tinkering with the debris will not restore the balance. We might fool ourselves by settling for the least we need to do; nature is not a spoilt child to be soothed with lollipops.With almost total impunity, mining is ravaging the environment in state after state. Under cover of the pandemic, there was a determined effort to dilute the environmental impact assessment for new industries. Global Forest Watch reports 3.4% loss of primary forests and 5% of total tree cover in India in the last twenty years, continuing even through the pandemic. Government reports are more positive.Some bucks must stop with the urban elite. The environment would be markedly more robust if privileged citizens used public transport, did not buy property on illegally reclaimed soil, and shunned tourist resorts invading eco-protected zones. Environmental laws are being redrafted or simply flouted on an epic scale to benefit construction and tourism no less than mining and industry. Promises of local employment and prosperity usually prove hollow: the indigenous population is displaced and impoverished. There is pervasive hypocrisy in touting environmental measures, like clean energy, consistent with big capital while consistently subverting them where that best serves the latter's turn.Q. Which of the following statements can most likely be inferred from the passage?a)The rigidity of environmental laws has led to increased flouting of rules.b)Some specific actions must be undertaken to tackle climate change.c)Practical logic alone would not suffice; it must be accompanied by an ideal of responsibility.d)Although the West reduced its dependence on coal, they were not ready to completely forgo it.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.