Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I and II are correct.b)Only II and III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Read the following passage and a...

Join the Discussion on the App

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.

Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.

The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".

The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.

Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.

The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.

There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.

Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:

Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.

Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.

Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.

Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?

a)
Only I & II are correct.
b)
Only II & III are correct.
c)
Only II is correct.
d)
Only I is correct.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

CLAT Practice Test- 32

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once t...

Anybody, including foreign nationals, can send a mercy petition to the President. President is not the only authority rather mercy pleas can also be sent to the Governors. The Governor cannot pardon a death sentence but can suspend, remit or commute a sentence of death. There is no maximum time-limit within which a mercy petition has to be decided.

Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) recommends the President as what to be done with a mercy petition. Under the settled law, including judgements of the Supreme Court, the President is bound by the advice of the Union Council of Ministers while deciding mercy petitions.

The recommendation of the MHA can be accepted as the view of the entire Council of Ministers on the subject because under the transaction of Business Rules of the Government of India, the MHA is the Ministry charged with making recommendations with regard to mercy petitions by those on death row.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgment in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition by approaching the {X} – directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.The {X}, in turn, seeks the opinion of the union cabinet via the union home ministry.{Y} of the Constitution says the {X} "shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death". While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The {X} may, if he or she wishes, return the home ministrys recommendation to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.The {X} has to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs. But there is no fixed time frame within which a president must act.{X} who held the chair from 2012-2017 has the record of rejecting the pleas. During tenure, the tenure 34 mercy petitions were disposed. While 30 mercy pleas were rejected, four such petitions were accepted barring {Z}, who had reportedly rejected 45 such pleas highest among all {X}.Q.With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I:A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II:There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III:In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. In the context of the given passage, choose the correct option from the following.Statement I: Mercy petition is not subject to Judicial Review.Statement II: Ministry of Human Affairs (MH

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. Which among the following statements is false?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q.Which of the following statements is incorrect?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q.In the context of the provided passage, please select the accurate statement from the following options:Statement I: Mercy petitions are exempt from Judicial Review.Statement II: The Ministry of Home Affairs (MH

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Once the Supreme Court announces its final judgement in a case involving capital punishment, the death row convict may file a mercy petition directly, or through prison officials, or through the governor of the state where he is imprisoned or via the union home ministry.The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that "every civilised country recognises and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in course of law".The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all punishments.Article 72 of the Constitution deals with the grant of pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where the sentence is a sentence of death. While the state governor also has pardoning powers, death sentences are not part of these.The recommendations of the Home Ministry may be returned to get further clarifications. The ministry can also itself recall its recommendation to provide a fresh input.There is no fixed time frame to decide on the recommendation of the ministry of home affairs.Q. With reference to the procedure of the Mercy petitions in India, consider the following statements:Statement I: A mercy petition can be filed only by Indian Citizens.Statement II: There is no time limit for the president to respond on the mercy petition.Statement III: In India, the authority to pardon a death sentence is with the President only.Which among the above statement(s) is/are correct?a)Only I & II are correct.b)Only II & III are correct.c)Only II is correct.d)Only I is correct.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam