All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  In India, which of the following courts are b... Start Learning for Free
In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?
  • a)
    District Court
  • b)
    High Court
  • c)
    Supreme Court
  • d)
    All of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Humanities/Arts doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously...
In India, all courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts. This principle is known as the doctrine of judicial precedent or stare decisis, which means "to stand by things decided." According to this principle, the decisions made by higher courts are binding on the lower courts. Therefore, if the Supreme Court of India has given a ruling on a particular issue, all lower courts, including district courts and high courts, must follow that ruling. This ensures consistency and predictability in the application of the law, as well as respect for the hierarchy of courts. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously...

Explanation:

District Court:
- District Courts in India are bound by the decisions of the higher courts, such as High Courts and the Supreme Court.

High Court:
- High Courts are bound by the decisions of the Supreme Court, which is the highest judicial authority in India.
- High Courts also have the power to review their own decisions.

Supreme Court:
- The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial authority in the country and its decisions are binding on all other courts.
- All other courts, including District Courts and High Courts, are obligated to follow the judgments of the Supreme Court.

Conclusion:
- In India, all courts, including District Courts, High Courts, and the Supreme Court, are bound to follow the previously decided judgments of the superior courts. This ensures consistency and uniformity in the application of law across the country.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.On 24th August 2017, the Supreme Court of India in a historic judgement declared the right to privacy as a fundamental right protected under the Indian Constitution. In declaring that this right stems from the fundamental right to life and liberty, the Courts decision has far-reaching consequences. The task before the nine-judge bench in the present case was to settle the law once and for all. This decision has connected our privacy jurisprudence over the years with our international commitments and established our conformity with comparative laws around the world.The Supreme Court confirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right that does not need to be separately articulated but can be derived from Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.The Supreme Court was at pains to clarify that the fundamental right to privacy is not absolute and will always be subject to reasonable restrictions. It held that the State can impose restrictions on the right to privacy to protect legitimate State interests but it can only do so by following the three-pronged test summarized below:i. Existence of a law that justifies an encroachment on privacyii. A legitimate State aim or need that ensures that the nature or the content of this law falls within the zone of reasonableness and operates to guard against arbitrary State actioniii. The means adopted by the State are proportional to the objects and needs sought to be fulfilled by the lawConsequently, all State action that could have an impact on privacy will now have to be measured against this three-fold test. This is likely to have an impact on several ongoing projects including most importantly, the Aadhaar identity project.The decision was issued in order to set at rest an unsettled position in law that had a bearing on a number of cases currently before various courts of the land. Now that this has been done, each of those cases will be decided on their merits relying on the wealth of opinions expressed in the present judgement.Therefore, in the near future, we are likely to receive a series of judgements on a wide range of matters that have a bearing on different aspects of privacy which will offer greater clarity on the manner in which Indian courts will look at these issues.Q.A politician alleged that the government was illegally tapping telephones of his house and office. Subsequently, a court-monitored investigation revealed widespread wiretapping undertaken by the government without any justification. The same was challenged in the Supreme Court that it is the violation of the right to privacy. Decide.

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.On 24th August 2017, the Supreme Court of India in a historic judgement declared the right to privacy as a fundamental right protected under the Indian Constitution. In declaring that this right stems from the fundamental right to life and liberty, the Courts decision has far-reaching consequences. The task before the nine-judge bench in the present case was to settle the law once and for all. This decision has connected our privacy jurisprudence over the years with our international commitments and established our conformity with comparative laws around the world.The Supreme Court confirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right that does not need to be separately articulated but can be derived from Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.The Supreme Court was at pains to clarify that the fundamental right to privacy is not absolute and will always be subject to reasonable restrictions. It held that the State can impose restrictions on the right to privacy to protect legitimate State interests but it can only do so by following the three-pronged test summarized below:i. Existence of a law that justifies an encroachment on privacyii. A legitimate State aim or need that ensures that the nature or the content of this law falls within the zone of reasonableness and operates to guard against arbitrary State actioniii. The means adopted by the State are proportional to the objects and needs sought to be fulfilled by the lawConsequently, all State action that could have an impact on privacy will now have to be measured against this three-fold test. This is likely to have an impact on several ongoing projects including most importantly, the Aadhaar identity project.The decision was issued in order to set at rest an unsettled position in law that had a bearing on a number of cases currently before various courts of the land. Now that this has been done, each of those cases will be decided on their merits relying on the wealth of opinions expressed in the present judgement.Therefore, in the near future, we are likely to receive a series of judgements on a wide range of matters that have a bearing on different aspects of privacy which will offer greater clarity on the manner in which Indian courts will look at these issues.Q.Identify the statements below which are true as per the given passage.

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.On 24th August 2017, the Supreme Court of India in a historic judgement declared the right to privacy as a fundamental right protected under the Indian Constitution. In declaring that this right stems from the fundamental right to life and liberty, the Courts decision has far-reaching consequences. The task before the nine-judge bench in the present case was to settle the law once and for all. This decision has connected our privacy jurisprudence over the years with our international commitments and established our conformity with comparative laws around the world.The Supreme Court confirmed that the right to privacy is a fundamental right that does not need to be separately articulated but can be derived from Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.The Supreme Court was at pains to clarify that the fundamental right to privacy is not absolute and will always be subject to reasonable restrictions. It held that the State can impose restrictions on the right to privacy to protect legitimate State interests but it can only do so by following the three-pronged test summarized below:i. Existence of a law that justifies an encroachment on privacyii. A legitimate State aim or need that ensures that the nature or the content of this law falls within the zone of reasonableness and operates to guard against arbitrary State actioniii. The means adopted by the State are proportional to the objects and needs sought to be fulfilled by the lawConsequently, all State action that could have an impact on privacy will now have to be measured against this three-fold test. This is likely to have an impact on several ongoing projects including most importantly, the Aadhaar identity project.The decision was issued in order to set at rest an unsettled position in law that had a bearing on a number of cases currently before various courts of the land. Now that this has been done, each of those cases will be decided on their merits relying on the wealth of opinions expressed in the present judgement.Therefore, in the near future, we are likely to receive a series of judgements on a wide range of matters that have a bearing on different aspects of privacy which will offer greater clarity on the manner in which Indian courts will look at these issues.Q.State of Khagoldesh made a law which confers some special rights on security forces for the purpose of investigation in the cases of treason. This law is challenged in the Supreme Court of Khagoldesh on the alleged ground that it breaches the right to privacy of the citizens guaranteed under the constitution. Decide on the basis of the reading of the passage.

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:Thus it was decided that what was till then known as ‘India’ would be divided into two countries, ‘India’ and ‘Pakistan’. Such a division was not only very painful, but also very difficult to decide and to implement. It was decided to follow the principle of religious majorities. This basically means that areas where the Muslims were in majority would make up the territory of Pakistan. The rest was to stay with India. The idea might appear simple, but it presented all kinds of difficulties. First of all, there was no single belt of Muslim majority areas in British India. There were two areas of concentration, one in the west and one in the east. There was no way these two parts could be joined. So it was decided that the new country, Pakistan, will comprise two territories, West and East Pakistan separated by a long expanse of Indian territory. Secondly, not all Muslim majority areas wanted to be in Pakistan. Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, the undisputed leader of the North Western Frontier Province and known as ‘Frontier Gandhi’, was staunchly opposed to the two-nation theory. Eventually, his voice was simply ignored and the NWFP was made to merge with Pakistan. The third problem was that two of the Muslim majority provinces of British India, Punjab and Bengal, had very large areas where the non-Muslims were in majority. Eventually it was decided that these two provinces would be bifurcated according to the religious majority at the district or even lower level. This decision could not be made by the midnight of 14-15 August. It meant that a large number of people did not know on the day of Independence whether they were in India or in Pakistan. The Partition of these two provinces caused the deepest trauma of Partition.Q. Who was known as “Frontier Gandhi”?

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:Thus it was decided that what was till then known as ‘India’ would be divided into two countries, ‘India’ and ‘Pakistan’. Such a division was not only very painful, but also very difficult to decide and to implement. It was decided to follow the principle of religious majorities. This basically means that areas where the Muslims were in majority would make up the territory of Pakistan. The rest was to stay with India. The idea might appear simple, but it presented all kinds of difficulties. First of all, there was no single belt of Muslim majority areas in British India. There were two areas of concentration, one in the west and one in the east. There was no way these two parts could be joined. So it was decided that the new country, Pakistan, will comprise two territories, West and East Pakistan separated by a long expanse of Indian territory. Secondly, not all Muslim majority areas wanted to be in Pakistan. Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan, the undisputed leader of the North Western Frontier Province and known as ‘Frontier Gandhi’, was staunchly opposed to the two-nation theory. Eventually, his voice was simply ignored and the NWFP was made to merge with Pakistan. The third problem was that two of the Muslim majority provinces of British India, Punjab and Bengal, had very large areas where the non-Muslims were in majority. Eventually it was decided that these two provinces would be bifurcated according to the religious majority at the district or even lower level. This decision could not be made by the midnight of 14-15 August. It meant that a large number of people did not know on the day of Independence whether they were in India or in Pakistan. The Partition of these two provinces caused the deepest trauma of Partition.Q. Which principle was followed for the division of India and Pakistan?

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In India, which of the following courts are bound to follow previously decided judgments of the superior courts?a)District Courtb)High Courtc)Supreme Courtd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup