**Possible Explanation:**

It seems that there might be a confusion or error in your question. John Hallock did not say that nine times nine is eighty-one. In fact, the correct answer is that nine times nine equals eighty-one.

The multiplication of nine by itself results in eighty-one, which is a basic mathematical fact. However, if you are referring to a specific context or situation where John Hallock made this statement, it would be helpful to provide more information to give a more accurate answer.

Nonetheless, here is a detailed explanation of why nine times nine equals eighty-one:

**Understanding Multiplication:**

Multiplication is a mathematical operation that combines two numbers (factors) to find their total value when repeated a certain number of times. It can be thought of as a shortcut for repeated addition.

For example, when we multiply 9 by 9, we are essentially adding nine to itself nine times: 9 + 9 + 9 + 9 + 9 + 9 + 9 + 9 + 9. The result of this addition is 81.

**Multiplication Properties:**

Multiplication follows various properties that help make calculations easier and more consistent. Some of the key properties include:

1. **Commutative Property:** The order of the factors does not affect the result of the multiplication. In other words, multiplying 9 by 9 is the same as multiplying 9 by 9: 9 × 9 = 9 × 9.

2. **Associative Property:** The grouping of the factors does not affect the result of the multiplication. For example, (9 × 9) × 1 is the same as 9 × (9 × 1), which is equal to 9 × 9.

3. **Identity Property:** When multiplying any number by 1, the result is the number itself. Therefore, 9 × 1 equals 9.

4. **Zero Property:** When multiplying any number by 0, the result is always 0. Thus, 9 × 0 equals 0.

**Conclusion:**

To summarize, John Hallock did not say that nine times nine is eighty-one. The correct mathematical statement is that nine times nine equals eighty-one. Multiplication is a fundamental mathematical operation, and understanding its properties can help in solving various problems and calculations.

There was no any mean of that... he was only thinking nd saying that..