Assertion International law is not law at all.Reason International law...
A is false but R is true. International law is a true law and it is to be regarded as law in the same way as that of ordinary laws of a State which are binding upon the individuals. There is currently no standing body of international law enforcement officers, nor is there strong political support for creating such a body.
Assertion International law is not law at all.Reason International law...
Understanding the Assertion and Reason
The assertion and reason presented in the question discuss the nature of international law and its enforcement mechanisms.
Assertion: International law is not law at all
- This statement is an oversimplification.
- International law is indeed a form of law that governs the relationships between states and other international actors.
- It consists of treaties, customs, and principles recognized as binding by states.
Reason: International law has no judicial system to enforce the law by applying sanctions
- While it is true that international law lacks a centralized judicial system akin to domestic law, this does not negate its status as law.
- Mechanisms for enforcement do exist, albeit in a different form, such as:
- Diplomatic negotiations
- Economic sanctions
- International courts (e.g., International Court of Justice)
- States often comply with international law due to mutual interests, reputational concerns, and the need for stability.
Conclusion
- The assertion is incorrect because international law functions effectively within its own framework, despite the lack of a robust enforcement mechanism.
- The reason, while accurate in identifying a limitation, does not serve as a valid explanation for the assertion's claim.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D': Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct.
This distinction highlights the complexity of international law and its functioning in the global arena.