All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:
  • a)
    This is an example of summary trial.
  • b)
    Theft is a compoundable offence.
  • c)
    This is an example of plea bargaining.
  • d)
    Theft is a non-compoundable offence.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated aga...
The given case is an example of plea bargaining. Plea bargaining refers to a person charged with a criminal offence negotiating with the prosecution for a lesser punishment than what is provided in law by pleading guilty to a less serious offence.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated aga...
Plea Bargaining Explained
Plea bargaining is a legal practice where the accused negotiates with the prosecution to plead guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for a lighter sentence. This arrangement is beneficial for both parties; it helps the defendant avoid a potentially harsher punishment and saves the court time and resources.

Key Elements of the Arrangement
- **Negotiation**: Prajapati approached the prosecution with the intention to negotiate.
- **Guilty Plea**: He agreed to plead guilty, which indicates that he is willing to accept responsibility for the crime.
- **Lesser Punishment**: The arrangement involves a promise of lesser punishment, a hallmark of plea bargaining.

Understanding Theft and Compounding Offences
- **Theft as a Non-Compoundable Offence**: Theft is generally considered a non-compoundable offence, meaning that it cannot be settled between the victim and the accused outside of court. The state retains the right to prosecute.
- **Compoundable vs. Non-Compoundable**: Compoundable offences allow for settlement between the parties involved, while non-compoundable offences require a formal trial process.

Conclusion
Given the context of Prajapati's situation, the correct answer is indeed option 'C'—this is an example of plea bargaining. The process exemplifies how defendants may seek to mitigate their consequences through negotiation with the prosecution, which is a recognized practice in many legal systems.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Direction: Read the case study given below and answer any three of the questions that follow.The protection of wildlife has a long tradition in India. Many stories of Panchtantra and Jungle Books, etc. have stood the test of time relating to the love for wildlife. These have a profound impact on young minds. In 1972, a comprehensive Wildlife Act was enacted, which provides the main legal framework for conservation and protection of wildlife in India. The two main objectives of the Act are to provide protection to the endangered species listed in the schedule of the Act and to provide legal support to the conservation areas of the country classified as National parks, sanctuaries and closed areas. This Act has been comprehensively amended in 1991, making punishments more stringent and has also made provisions for the protection of specified plant species and conservation of endangered species of wild animals. There are 103 National parks and 535 wildlife sanctuaries in the country (Appendix V). Wildlife conservation has a very large ambit with unbounded potential for the wellbeing of humankind. However, this can be achieved only when every individual understands its significance and contributes his bit. For the purpose of effective conservation of flora and fauna, special steps have been initiated by the Government of India in collaboration with UNESCO’s ‘Man and Biosphere Programme’. Special schemes like Project Tiger (1973) and Project Elephant (1992) have been launched to conserve these species and their habitat in a sustainable manner. Project Tiger has been implemented since 1973. The main objective of the scheme is to ensure maintenance of viable population of tigers in India for scientific, aesthetic, cultural and ecological values, and to preserve areas of biological importance as natural heritage for the benefit, education and enjoyment of the people. Initially, the Project Tiger was launched in nine tiger reserves, covering an area of 16,339 sq. km, which has now increased to 44 tiger reserves, encompassing 36,988.28 sq. km of core tiger habitats distributed in 17 states. The tiger population in the country has registered an increase from 1,411 in 2006 to 1,706 in 2010. Project Elephant was launched in 1992 to assist states having free ranging population of wild elephants. It was aimed at ensuring long-term survival of identified viable population of elephants in their natural habitat. The project is being implemented in 17 states. Apart from this, some other projects such as Crocodile Breeding Project, Project Hangul and conservation of Himalayan Musk deer have also been launched by the Government of India.Q. How many National Parks are there in the country?

Direction: Read the case study given below and answer any three of the questions that follow.The protection of wildlife has a long tradition in India. Many stories of Panchtantra and Jungle Books, etc. have stood the test of time relating to the love for wildlife. These have a profound impact on young minds. In 1972, a comprehensive Wildlife Act was enacted, which provides the main legal framework for conservation and protection of wildlife in India. The two main objectives of the Act are to provide protection to the endangered species listed in the schedule of the Act and to provide legal support to the conservation areas of the country classified as National parks, sanctuaries and closed areas. This Act has been comprehensively amended in 1991, making punishments more stringent and has also made provisions for the protection of specified plant species and conservation of endangered species of wild animals. There are 103 National parks and 535 wildlife sanctuaries in the country (Appendix V). Wildlife conservation has a very large ambit with unbounded potential for the wellbeing of humankind. However, this can be achieved only when every individual understands its significance and contributes his bit. For the purpose of effective conservation of flora and fauna, special steps have been initiated by the Government of India in collaboration with UNESCO’s ‘Man and Biosphere Programme’. Special schemes like Project Tiger (1973) and Project Elephant (1992) have been launched to conserve these species and their habitat in a sustainable manner. Project Tiger has been implemented since 1973. The main objective of the scheme is to ensure maintenance of viable population of tigers in India for scientific, aesthetic, cultural and ecological values, and to preserve areas of biological importance as natural heritage for the benefit, education and enjoyment of the people. Initially, the Project Tiger was launched in nine tiger reserves, covering an area of 16,339 sq. km, which has now increased to 44 tiger reserves, encompassing 36,988.28 sq. km of core tiger habitats distributed in 17 states. The tiger population in the country has registered an increase from 1,411 in 2006 to 1,706 in 2010. Project Elephant was launched in 1992 to assist states having free ranging population of wild elephants. It was aimed at ensuring long-term survival of identified viable population of elephants in their natural habitat. The project is being implemented in 17 states. Apart from this, some other projects such as Crocodile Breeding Project, Project Hangul and conservation of Himalayan Musk deer have also been launched by the Government of India.Q. When was Project Elephant launched?

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Prajapati was accused of theft and a criminal action was initiated against him. While the trial was pending in the court, Prajapati approached the prosecution and tried to negotiate the matter. He agreed to plead guilty in return for a lesser punishment. Choose the correct option with respect to the above arrangement:a)This is an example of summary trial.b)Theft is a compoundable offence.c)This is an example of plea bargaining.d)Theft is a non-compoundable offence.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup