UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > What was the significance of the Golaknath ca...
Start Learning for Free
What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?
- a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrine
- b)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amended
- c)It added 'judicial review' and 'balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP' to the list of basic structure features
- d)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendment
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context ...
The significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine:
The Golaknath case of 1967 was a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India that had significant implications for the interpretation of the Constitution and the relationship between Fundamental Rights and the power of Parliament to amend them. It laid the foundation for the development of the Basic Structure Doctrine, although it did not explicitly establish it.
Background:
The case originated from a challenge to the constitutional validity of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, which sought to impose restrictions on the right to hold agricultural land. The petitioner, Keshavananda Bharati, argued that the Act violated his fundamental right to property under Article 19(1)(f) and 31(1) of the Constitution.
Key arguments:
During the course of the proceedings, the question of whether Parliament had the power to amend Fundamental Rights arose. The government argued that Parliament had unlimited power to amend any provision of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights. On the other hand, the petitioner contended that Fundamental Rights were inviolable and could not be amended.
The Supreme Court's ruling:
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, held that Parliament did have the power to amend Fundamental Rights under Article 368 of the Constitution. However, it also held that the power of amendment was not unlimited and that any amendment which destroyed or abrogated the basic structure of the Constitution would be invalid.
Significance:
The significance of the Golaknath case lies in the fact that it marked a significant departure from the Court's earlier stance on the power of Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights. Prior to this case, the Court had held in the Shankari Prasad case (1951) and the Sajjan Singh case (1965) that Fundamental Rights could be amended by Parliament.
The Golaknath case reversed this earlier position and held that Fundamental Rights could not be amended. Although the Court did not explicitly establish the Basic Structure Doctrine in this case, it laid the groundwork for its development in subsequent cases. The Court recognized that there were certain foundational principles and features of the Constitution which formed its basic structure and could not be amended.
While the Golaknath case did not strike down the Kerala Land Reforms Act, its ruling on the power of Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights set the stage for the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), where the Court explicitly established the Basic Structure Doctrine.
The Golaknath case of 1967 was a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India that had significant implications for the interpretation of the Constitution and the relationship between Fundamental Rights and the power of Parliament to amend them. It laid the foundation for the development of the Basic Structure Doctrine, although it did not explicitly establish it.
Background:
The case originated from a challenge to the constitutional validity of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, which sought to impose restrictions on the right to hold agricultural land. The petitioner, Keshavananda Bharati, argued that the Act violated his fundamental right to property under Article 19(1)(f) and 31(1) of the Constitution.
Key arguments:
During the course of the proceedings, the question of whether Parliament had the power to amend Fundamental Rights arose. The government argued that Parliament had unlimited power to amend any provision of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights. On the other hand, the petitioner contended that Fundamental Rights were inviolable and could not be amended.
The Supreme Court's ruling:
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, held that Parliament did have the power to amend Fundamental Rights under Article 368 of the Constitution. However, it also held that the power of amendment was not unlimited and that any amendment which destroyed or abrogated the basic structure of the Constitution would be invalid.
Significance:
The significance of the Golaknath case lies in the fact that it marked a significant departure from the Court's earlier stance on the power of Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights. Prior to this case, the Court had held in the Shankari Prasad case (1951) and the Sajjan Singh case (1965) that Fundamental Rights could be amended by Parliament.
The Golaknath case reversed this earlier position and held that Fundamental Rights could not be amended. Although the Court did not explicitly establish the Basic Structure Doctrine in this case, it laid the groundwork for its development in subsequent cases. The Court recognized that there were certain foundational principles and features of the Constitution which formed its basic structure and could not be amended.
While the Golaknath case did not strike down the Kerala Land Reforms Act, its ruling on the power of Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights set the stage for the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), where the Court explicitly established the Basic Structure Doctrine.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context ...
The Golaknath case (1967) was significant in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine, as it reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amended. The Supreme Court stated that Fundamental Rights are not amenable to Parliamentary restriction as stated in Article 13 and that to amend the Fundamental rights a new Constituent Assembly would be required.
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice What was the significance of the Golaknath case (1967) in the context of the Basic Structure Doctrine?a)It established the Basic Structure Doctrineb)It reversed the earlier stance that Fundamental Rights can be amendedc)It added judicial review and balance between Fundamental Rights and DPSP to the list of basic structure featuresd)It applied the Basic Structure Doctrine to strike down a constitutional amendmentCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup