Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > Article 368 of the Indian constitution provid...

Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides that

a)
An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliament
b)
Provision for free and compulsory education for children
c)
Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipality
d)
Uniform civil code for the citizens

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bil...

Introduction:
Article 368 of the Indian Constitution deals with the power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution. The Constitution of India is a living document that has undergone several amendments since its adoption in 1950. The amendment procedure is laid down in Article 368, and it is a complex process that involves both houses of Parliament.

Explanation:
The correct answer to this question is option A, which states that an amendment bill can be introduced in either house of Parliament. This means that a member of either the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha can introduce an amendment bill to the Constitution. However, such a bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament with a two-thirds majority before it can be sent to the President for his assent.

The amendment procedure laid down in Article 368 is a complex one and involves several stages. Some of the key features of the amendment procedure are as follows:

- Amendment bills can be introduced in either house of Parliament.
- The bill has to be passed by both houses of Parliament with a two-thirds majority.
- If the bill seeks to amend any of the fundamental rights, it has to be ratified by at least half of the state legislatures.
- The President has to give his assent to the bill before it becomes law.
- The Supreme Court can review the validity of any amendment made to the Constitution.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, Article 368 of the Indian Constitution provides for the power of the Parliament to amend the Constitution. An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of Parliament, but it has to be passed with a two-thirds majority before it can become law. The amendment procedure is a complex one and involves several stages, including ratification by state legislatures and assent by the President.

Answered by Crafty Classes · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The steps for creating a new state are as follows: A bill on a new state has to be recommended by the President. In India, it is usually the Cabinet which requests the President to do that. Article 3 makes it clear that the Parliament is the sole authority on making a decision on a new state. President refers the bill to the State Assembly for its views giving it a certain period of time. Parliament is not obligated to follow on the views of State Assembly. If the State Assembly does not express its opinion within the specified period of time, the bill could be introduced in the Parliament after the expiry of the specified period. Why did the authors of the constitution put complete responsibility of creating new states ONLY with the Parliament? Why did they not provide a bigger role for a State Assembly other than expressing ‘its views’ on the topic? To understand the intentions behind a certain clause in our Constitution the legal experts refer to the discussions of the authors that preceded the formulation of these clauses referred to as Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD). One legal expert clarifies: When the Constituent Assembly was deliberating in November 1948 on the scope and content of Article 3, there was a proposal by Prof. KT Shah that the legislation constituting a new State from any region of a State should originate from the legislature of the State concerned. Had this procedure been approved, the power to decide the statehood of a region seeking separation would have been vested with the State legislature dominated by the elite of developed regions. Opposing the same and using the then demand for an Andhra Province as an example, Shri K. Santhanam stated as under: “I wonder whether Professor Shah fully realizes the implications of his amendment. If his amendment is adopted, it would mean that no minority in any State can ask for separation of territory… unless it can get a majority in that State legislature. Take the case of Madras Province for instance. The Andhra’s want separation. They bring up a resolution in the Madras Legislature. It is defeated by a majority. There ends the matter. The way of the Andhra’s is blocked altogether. They cannot take any further step to constitute an Andhra province.” Thus Article 3 emerged in its current form.Q. To whom does the President refer the bill after his review?

View answer

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The steps for creating a new state are as follows: A bill on a new state has to be recommended by the President. In India, it is usually the Cabinet which requests the President to do that. Article 3 makes it clear that the Parliament is the sole authority on making a decision on a new state. President refers the bill to the State Assembly for its views giving it a certain period of time. Parliament is not obligated to follow on the views of State Assembly. If the State Assembly does not express its opinion within the specified period of time, the bill could be introduced in the Parliament after the expiry of the specified period. Why did the authors of the constitution put complete responsibility of creating new states ONLY with the Parliament? Why did they not provide a bigger role for a State Assembly other than expressing ‘its views’ on the topic? To understand the intentions behind a certain clause in our Constitution the legal experts refer to the discussions of the authors that preceded the formulation of these clauses referred to as Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD). One legal expert clarifies: When the Constituent Assembly was deliberating in November 1948 on the scope and content of Article 3, there was a proposal by Prof. KT Shah that the legislation constituting a new State from any region of a State should originate from the legislature of the State concerned. Had this procedure been approved, the power to decide the statehood of a region seeking separation would have been vested with the State legislature dominated by the elite of developed regions. Opposing the same and using the then demand for an Andhra Province as an example, Shri K. Santhanam stated as under: “I wonder whether Professor Shah fully realizes the implications of his amendment. If his amendment is adopted, it would mean that no minority in any State can ask for separation of territory… unless it can get a majority in that State legislature. Take the case of Madras Province for instance. The Andhra’s want separation. They bring up a resolution in the Madras Legislature. It is defeated by a majority. There ends the matter. The way of the Andhra’s is blocked altogether. They cannot take any further step to constitute an Andhra province.” Thus Article 3 emerged in its current form.Q. Where did the Andhra’s get resolution from?

View answer

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The steps for creating a new state are as follows: A bill on a new state has to be recommended by the President. In India, it is usually the Cabinet which requests the President to do that. Article 3 makes it clear that the Parliament is the sole authority on making a decision on a new state. President refers the bill to the State Assembly for its views giving it a certain period of time. Parliament is not obligated to follow on the views of State Assembly. If the State Assembly does not express its opinion within the specified period of time, the bill could be introduced in the Parliament after the expiry of the specified period. Why did the authors of the constitution put complete responsibility of creating new states ONLY with the Parliament? Why did they not provide a bigger role for a State Assembly other than expressing ‘its views’ on the topic? To understand the intentions behind a certain clause in our Constitution the legal experts refer to the discussions of the authors that preceded the formulation of these clauses referred to as Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD). One legal expert clarifies: When the Constituent Assembly was deliberating in November 1948 on the scope and content of Article 3, there was a proposal by Prof. KT Shah that the legislation constituting a new State from any region of a State should originate from the legislature of the State concerned. Had this procedure been approved, the power to decide the statehood of a region seeking separation would have been vested with the State legislature dominated by the elite of developed regions. Opposing the same and using the then demand for an Andhra Province as an example, Shri K. Santhanam stated as under: “I wonder whether Professor Shah fully realizes the implications of his amendment. If his amendment is adopted, it would mean that no minority in any State can ask for separation of territory… unless it can get a majority in that State legislature. Take the case of Madras Province for instance. The Andhra’s want separation. They bring up a resolution in the Madras Legislature. It is defeated by a majority. There ends the matter. The way of the Andhra’s is blocked altogether. They cannot take any further step to constitute an Andhra province.” Thus Article 3 emerged in its current form.Q. In India, who presents the bill for the formation of the new state to the President?

View answer

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follows:The steps for creating a new state are as follows: A bill on a new state has to be recommended by the President. In India, it is usually the Cabinet which requests the President to do that. Article 3 makes it clear that the Parliament is the sole authority on making a decision on a new state. President refers the bill to the State Assembly for its views giving it a certain period of time. Parliament is not obligated to follow on the views of State Assembly. If the State Assembly does not express its opinion within the specified period of time, the bill could be introduced in the Parliament after the expiry of the specified period. Why did the authors of the constitution put complete responsibility of creating new states ONLY with the Parliament? Why did they not provide a bigger role for a State Assembly other than expressing ‘its views’ on the topic? To understand the intentions behind a certain clause in our Constitution the legal experts refer to the discussions of the authors that preceded the formulation of these clauses referred to as Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD). One legal expert clarifies: When the Constituent Assembly was deliberating in November 1948 on the scope and content of Article 3, there was a proposal by Prof. KT Shah that the legislation constituting a new State from any region of a State should originate from the legislature of the State concerned. Had this procedure been approved, the power to decide the statehood of a region seeking separation would have been vested with the State legislature dominated by the elite of developed regions. Opposing the same and using the then demand for an Andhra Province as an example, Shri K. Santhanam stated as under: “I wonder whether Professor Shah fully realizes the implications of his amendment. If his amendment is adopted, it would mean that no minority in any State can ask for separation of territory… unless it can get a majority in that State legislature. Take the case of Madras Province for instance. The Andhra’s want separation. They bring up a resolution in the Madras Legislature. It is defeated by a majority. There ends the matter. The way of the Andhra’s is blocked altogether. They cannot take any further step to constitute an Andhra province.” Thus Article 3 emerged in its current form.Q. “The legislation constituting a new State from any region of a State should originate from the legislature of the State concerned.” This proposal who put forth by whom in 1948?

View answer

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow:In 1978 the Constitution of Sri Lanka was amended and the system of Executive Presidency was introduced. Under the system of Executive Presidency, people directly elect the President. It may happen that both the President and the Prime Minister belong to the same political party or to different political parties. The President has vast powers under the constitution. The President chooses the Prime Minister from the party that has a majority in the Parliament Though ministers must be members of the Parliament, the President has the power to remove the Prime Minister, or ministers. Apart from being the elected Head of State and the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, the President is also the Head of the Government Elected for a term of six years, the President cannot be removed except by a resolution in the Parliament passed by at least two-thirds of the total number of Members of Parliament If it is passed by not less than one-half of the total number of Members of Parliament and the Speaker is satisfied that such allegations merit inquiry, then the Speaker can report the matter to the Supreme Court.Q. When was the Executive Presidency introduced in Sri Lanka?

View answer

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

Geography Class 11

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

View all

Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Article 368 of the Indian constitution provides thata)An amendment bill can be introduced in either house of parliamentb)Provision for free and compulsory education for childrenc)Seats shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in every Municipalityd)Uniform civil code for the citizensCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam