Question Description
Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Please read the passage and answer the question that follow:Why was salt the symbol of protest? This is what Mahatma Gandhi wrote: The volume of information being gained daily shows how wickedly the salt tax has been designed. In order to prevent the use of salt that has not paid the tax which is at times even fourteen times its value, the Government destroys the salt it cannot sell profitably. Thus it taxes the nations vital necessity; it prevents the public from manufacturing it and destroys what nature manufactures without effort. No adjective is strong enough for characterizing the wicked dog-in-the-manger policy.From various sources I hear tales of such wanton destruction of the nations property in all parts of India.Maunds if not tons of salt are said to be destroyed on the Konkan coast. The same tale comes from Dandi.Wherever there is likelihood of natural salt being taken away by the people living in the neighbourhood of such areas for their personal use, salt officers are posted for the sole purpose of carrying on destruction. Thus valuable national property is destroyed at national expense and salt taken out of the mouths of the people.The salt monopoly is thus a fourfold curse. It deprives tire people of a valuable easy village industry, involves wanton destruction of property that nature produces in abundance, the destruction itself means more national expenditure, and fourthly, to crown this folly, an unheard of tax of more than 1,000 per cent is exacted from a. starving people.This tax has remained so long because of the apathy of the general public. Now that it is sufficiently roused, the tax has to go. How soon it will be abolished depends upon tire strength the people.Q. Which one of the following statements is incorrect?a)The salt monopoly depriv ed people of an easy village industryb)Salt was exported in large quantity to Britainc)Salt was destroyed at national expensed)A tax of more than 1000 percent was exacted from a poor populationCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.