CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Which international day emphasizes the protec... Start Learning for Free
Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?
  • a)
    International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggression
  • b)
    International Day of Peace
  • c)
    International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women
  • d)
    International Day of Non-Violence
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from vio...
The International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggression, observed on June 4 each year, focuses on the rights of children and aims to protect them from incidents of violence, sexual abuse, and terror. This day highlights the commitment of the United Nations to safeguarding the rights of children worldwide. Therefore, the correct answer is a.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

On February 10, the Supreme Court (SC) issued a notice to prohibit children from entering the areas where Anti – CAA protests were held. The notice was issued in a matter where the SC took suo moto cognisance of the involvement of children in protests in a letter addressing the death of a four-month-old. This order violates children’s right to protest. Article 19 of the Indian Constitution protects the right to protest. This right reasonably extends to children. According to Article 19(2), the right to protest can be restricted for various reasons, including protecting the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality. Considering the fact that the children were protesting peacefully and for legitimate reasons, the restriction on their right to protest does not fall under any of the possible basis in Article 19(2).Another right engaged by this restriction is children’s right to education and development. In Unnikrishnan v State of A.P., the SC held that Article 21 includes the protection of children’s right to educational opportunities and facilities for children to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity. This arguably encompasses their rights to protest and freedom of expression. Preventing children from expressing their opinions compromises the freedom to express their opinions and arguably curtails their right to develop in conditions of freedom and dignity. The jurisprudence of Indian courts has not had an opportunity to set out the scope of the rights to protest and expression in the context of children.Under international law, Article 13 of the UNCRC, ratified by India in 1992, provides that children have the right to freedom of expression, this includes, “freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds”. Further, Article 15 of the UNCRC protects children’s freedom to associate and peaceful assembly. These rights can only be restricted by provisions which are ‘necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order, the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.’ There may be reasons to restrict the presence of very young and unsupervised children at protests. However, the court’s order arbitrarily banned all children from the Shaheen-Bagh protest site, irrespective of their age and for an indefinite period. This wide ban is arbitrary and a manifestly disproportionate tool for realising any laudable aims under the Indian Constitution and in international law. In addition to violating children’s right to protest, the order also limits the participation of parents and other child caregivers. This will have a disproportionate impact on women as they bear the larger share of child care, limiting their right to freedom of expression and protest.In Unnikrishnan v. State of A.P., the SC held that Article 21 includes the protection of children’s right to educational opportunities and facilities for children to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity. Which of the following can be said to be not flowing from this interpretation?

The Scottish Parliament has passed a law criminalizing physical punishment to children.The bill, titled as Children (Equal Protection from Assault) (Scotlan d) Bill, intends to abolish the defence of reasonable chastisement, i.e. a common law rule that the physical punishment of a child in the exercise of a parental right or a right derived from having charge or care of the child is justifiable and is therefore not an assault.Section 51 (physical punishment of children) of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003 will also be repealed when the law comes into force. The main provision of the Act will come into force on the expiry of the period of 12 months beginning with the day of Royal Assent.The Minister for Children and Young People Maree Todd, during the debate in the parliament said, “The removal of the defence of reasonable chastisement will help to ensure that that goal can be achieved. The bill places Scotland in the vanguard in the UK in providing children with the same legal protection from assault as adults. That is the kind of country that I want my children to grow up in. The Scottish Government supports the removal of the defence. It’s very name—reasonable chastisement—is outdated and unconscionable. It suggests that it is sometimes acceptable to hit a child, which is at odds with the Scottish Governments aim of helping children to grow up feeling safe. It is also at odds with the international evidence that shows that the physical punishment of children is harmful and ineffective.In line with that international evidence, many countries have already changed their laws in that area, in ways that are appropriate to their legal systems. By removing the reasonable chastisement defence, we will provide children with the same legal protection from assault as adults. Why would we not want that for our children?” The minister also clarified that removal of the defence does not impact the ability of a parent to use restraint to prevent their child from coming to harm. "At its heart, restraint is an act of protection. Physical punishment is an act of discipline. They are fundamentally different.” she said.Section 51 of the 2003 Act limited the common law rule by prohibiting hitting a child with an implement, hitting them on the head, or shaking them. It also put into statute common law principles about the factors a court must have regard to when considering whether an assault on a child, in exercise of a parental right or a right derived from having charge or care of a child, was justifiable.Q.Which of the following statements may not be considered to be correct as per the passage?

Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.The Scottish Parliament has passed a law criminalizing physical punishment to children. The bill, titled as Children (Equal Protection from Assault) (Scotlan d) Bill, intends to abolish the defence of reasonable chastisement, i.e. a common law rule that the physical punishment of a child in the exercise of a parental right or a right derived from having charge or care of the child is justifiable and is therefore not an assault.Section 51 (physical punishment of children) of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003 will also be repealed when the law comes into force. The main provision of the Act will come into force on the expiry of the period of 12 months beginning with the day of Royal Assent.The Minister for Children and Young People Maree Todd, during the debate in the parliament said, “The removal of the defence of reasonable chastisement will help to ensure that that goal can be achieved. The bill places Scotland in the vanguard in the UK in providing children with the same legal protection from assault as adults. That is the kind of country that I want my children to grow up in. The Scottish Government supports the removal of the defence. It’s very name—reasonable chastisement—is outdated and unconscionable. It suggests that it is sometimes acceptable to hit a child, which is at odds with the Scottish Governments aim of helping children to grow up feeling safe. It is also at odds with the international evidence that shows that the physical punishment of children is harmful and ineffective. In line with that international evidence, many countries have already changed their laws in that area, in ways that are appropriate to their legal systems. By removing the reasonable chastisement defence, we will provide children with the same legal protection from assault as adults. Why would we not want that for our children?”The minister also clarified that removal of the defence does not impact the ability of a parent to use restraint to prevent their child from coming to harm. "At its heart, restraint is an act of protection. Physical punishment is an act of discipline. They are fundamentally different.” she said.Section 51 of the 2003 Act limited the common law rule by prohibiting hitting a child with an implement, hitting them on the head, or shaking them. It also put into statute common law principles about the factors a court must have regard to when considering whether an assault on a child, in exercise of a parental right or a right derived from having charge or care of a child, was justifiable.Q.Which of the following statements may not be considered to be correct as per the passage?

Top Courses for CLAT

Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which international day emphasizes the protection of children from violence and abuse?a)International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggressionb)International Day of Peacec)International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Womend)International Day of Non-ViolenceCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev