GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Mayor: In each of the past five years, the ci...
Start Learning for Free
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?
- a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.
- b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.
- c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.
- d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.
- e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding...
The mayor's conclusion is that school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services. In order to support this conclusion, we need to find an answer choice that strengthens the claim that previous cuts only affected nonessential services.
(A) The efficiency with which essential and nonessential services are provided is not relevant to the argument. This answer choice does not provide any support for the mayor's conclusion, so it can be eliminated.
(B) This answer choice states that there are sufficient funds available for the city's schools to provide some nonessential services. If the schools can still provide nonessential services despite previous cuts, it suggests that the previous cuts indeed targeted nonessential services only. This supports the mayor's conclusion that further cuts can be made without affecting essential services. Therefore, (B) is a strong contender.
(C) This answer choice talks about price estimates for nonessential services and whether they have increased since the most recent funding cut. However, this information does not directly support the claim that previous cuts only affected nonessential services. It is not as strong as (B) in supporting the mayor's conclusion, so (C) can be eliminated.
(D) The support or lack of support from influential city administrators regarding nonessential services does not directly address the mayor's conclusion. This answer choice is not relevant to the argument and can be eliminated.
(E) This answer choice talks about the tendency of school officials to exaggerate the impact of funding cuts. However, it does not provide any evidence about whether previous cuts only affected nonessential services. Therefore, (E) is not as strong as (B) in supporting the mayor's conclusion and can be eliminated.
In conclusion, answer choice (B) is the best option as it directly supports the mayor's claim that further cuts can be made without reducing any expenditures for essential services.
Most Upvoted Answer
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding...
The mayor's conclusion is that school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services. In order to support this conclusion, we need to find an answer choice that strengthens the claim that previous cuts only affected nonessential services.
(A) The efficiency with which essential and nonessential services are provided is not relevant to the argument. This answer choice does not provide any support for the mayor's conclusion, so it can be eliminated.
(B) This answer choice states that there are sufficient funds available for the city's schools to provide some nonessential services. If the schools can still provide nonessential services despite previous cuts, it suggests that the previous cuts indeed targeted nonessential services only. This supports the mayor's conclusion that further cuts can be made without affecting essential services. Therefore, (B) is a strong contender.
(C) This answer choice talks about price estimates for nonessential services and whether they have increased since the most recent funding cut. However, this information does not directly support the claim that previous cuts only affected nonessential services. It is not as strong as (B) in supporting the mayor's conclusion, so (C) can be eliminated.
(D) The support or lack of support from influential city administrators regarding nonessential services does not directly address the mayor's conclusion. This answer choice is not relevant to the argument and can be eliminated.
(E) This answer choice talks about the tendency of school officials to exaggerate the impact of funding cuts. However, it does not provide any evidence about whether previous cuts only affected nonessential services. Therefore, (E) is not as strong as (B) in supporting the mayor's conclusion and can be eliminated.
In conclusion, answer choice (B) is the best option as it directly supports the mayor's claim that further cuts can be made without reducing any expenditures for essential services.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding...
Understanding the Mayor's Conclusion
The mayor concludes that school officials can continue to reduce expenditures without impacting essential services. This is based on the observation that previous cuts did not affect essential services.
Supporting Evidence: Option B
Option B states: "Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services." This statement strongly supports the mayor's conclusion for several reasons:
Key Points:
- Financial Flexibility: If sufficient funds are available, it implies that the schools can easily manage their budget and allocate resources without jeopardizing essential services.
- Nonessential Services: The presence of sufficient funds specifically for nonessential services reinforces the idea that cuts can be made in these areas without impacting essential services.
- Previous Trends: The mayor indicates that prior cuts led to reductions in nonessential services. If schools can still afford some nonessential services now, it suggests that further cuts can continue to be made in nonessential areas.
Conclusion:
Thus, Option B provides the strongest support for the mayor's assertion that school officials can make additional cuts without affecting essential services. It confirms the financial capacity of the schools to sustain essential services, validating the mayor's argument.
The mayor concludes that school officials can continue to reduce expenditures without impacting essential services. This is based on the observation that previous cuts did not affect essential services.
Supporting Evidence: Option B
Option B states: "Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services." This statement strongly supports the mayor's conclusion for several reasons:
Key Points:
- Financial Flexibility: If sufficient funds are available, it implies that the schools can easily manage their budget and allocate resources without jeopardizing essential services.
- Nonessential Services: The presence of sufficient funds specifically for nonessential services reinforces the idea that cuts can be made in these areas without impacting essential services.
- Previous Trends: The mayor indicates that prior cuts led to reductions in nonessential services. If schools can still afford some nonessential services now, it suggests that further cuts can continue to be made in nonessential areas.
Conclusion:
Thus, Option B provides the strongest support for the mayor's assertion that school officials can make additional cuts without affecting essential services. It confirms the financial capacity of the schools to sustain essential services, validating the mayor's argument.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Mayor: In each of the past five years, the city has cut school funding and each time school officials complained that the cuts would force them to reduce expenditures for essential services. But each time, only expenditures for nonessential services were actually reduced. So school officials can implement further cuts without reducing any expenditures for essential services.Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the mayor’s conclusion?a)The city’s schools have always provided essential services as efficiently as they have provided nonessential services.b)Sufficient funds are currently available to allow the city’s schools to provide some nonessential services.c)Price estimates quoted to the city’s schools for the provision of nonessential services have not increased substantially since the most recent school funding cut.d)Few influential city administrators support the funding of costly nonessential services in the city’s schools.e)The city’s school officials rarely exaggerate the potential impact of threatened funding cuts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup