You are the officer incharge of a village administering distribution o...
Introduction:
As the officer in charge of administering the distribution of vaccines in an isolated epidemic-hit village, I am faced with the challenging situation of having only one vaccine left. The Gram Pradhan and a poor villager both require the vaccine, and the Gram Pradhan is pressuring me to issue it to him. In this situation, the most appropriate course of action would be to ask both parties to approach a doctor and get an input about the urgency of their conditions. This approach ensures fairness and prioritizes medical expertise in making the decision.
Explanation:
1. Ensuring fairness:
By asking both the Gram Pradhan and the poor villager to consult with a doctor, I am ensuring fairness in the decision-making process. This approach treats both individuals equally and allows for an unbiased assessment of their medical needs.
2. Prioritizing medical expertise:
As an officer in charge, I am not a medical professional. Thus, it is crucial to rely on the expertise of doctors to evaluate the urgency of each person's condition. Doctors are trained to assess medical emergencies and prioritize treatment accordingly. By involving a doctor in the decision-making process, I am ensuring that the vaccine is allocated based on medical necessity rather than external pressures or personal preferences.
3. Assessing urgency:
When the Gram Pradhan and the poor villager consult with a doctor, the medical professional can evaluate their respective conditions and determine the urgency of their need for the vaccine. This assessment may consider various factors such as the severity of symptoms, vulnerability to complications, and the overall impact on their health. The doctor's input will provide a reliable and informed basis for deciding who should receive the vaccine.
4. Future arrangements:
While waiting for the doctor's assessment, I can initiate the procedure to expedite the next supply of vaccines. This proactive approach ensures that additional vaccines will be available for distribution in the village as soon as possible. However, it is important to note that the decision regarding the current vaccine should be made based on medical necessity and not solely on the availability of future supplies.
Conclusion:
In the given scenario, the most appropriate course of action would be to ask both the Gram Pradhan and the poor villager to approach a doctor and get an input about the urgency of their conditions. This approach ensures fairness, prioritizes medical expertise, and allows for an informed decision to be made regarding the allocation of the remaining vaccine.
You are the officer incharge of a village administering distribution o...
For this situation asking both villager and Gram Pradhan to approach a doctor would be more appropriate solution because selecting either option (b) or (d) would be favouritism while selecting option (a) would lead to delay in the process of distribution of vaccine in an epidemic hit village. Thus, option (c) is the balanced approach to solve the present problem.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.