GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  If the play were successful, it would be adap... Start Learning for Free
If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.
The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argument
  • a)
    fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neither
  • b)
    fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessful
  • c)
    equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial success
  • d)
    presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival
  • e)
    fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived...
(A) fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neither.
This option suggests that the argument fails to consider the possibility that the play could be both adapted as a movie and revived at the Decade Festival. However, this is not the flaw in the argument. The flaw lies in assuming that because the play is not successful, it will not be either adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. So, this option is incorrect.
(B) fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessful.
This option suggests that the argument does not provide a clear explanation of how the play is unsuccessful. While this may be a valid criticism, it is not the main flaw in the argument. The main flaw is the assumption that lack of success automatically excludes the possibility of adaptation or revival. Therefore, this option is not the correct choice.
(C) equates the play's aesthetic worth with its commercial success.
This option suggests that the argument assumes that the play's commercial success is directly related to its aesthetic worth. However, the argument does not explicitly make this equation. It is focused on the play's success in terms of adaptation and revival, rather than aesthetic worth. Hence, this option is not the correct choice.
(D) presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival.
This option points out that the argument assumes that there are no other possibilities or avenues for the play's success besides adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival. However, the argument does not provide any justification or reasoning for this assumption. This lack of justification is indeed a flaw in the argument. Therefore, this option is a valid choice.
(E) fails to recognize that the play's not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival.
This option correctly identifies the flaw in the argument. The argument assumes that because the play is not successful, it will not meet the conditions for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival. However, it fails to consider that the play might satisfy different conditions or criteria for these opportunities. Thus, this option is the correct choice.
In conclusion, the correct answer is (E) fails to recognize that the play's not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived...
(A) fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neither.
This option suggests that the argument fails to consider the possibility that the play could be both adapted as a movie and revived at the Decade Festival. However, this is not the flaw in the argument. The flaw lies in assuming that because the play is not successful, it will not be either adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. So, this option is incorrect.
(B) fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessful.
This option suggests that the argument does not provide a clear explanation of how the play is unsuccessful. While this may be a valid criticism, it is not the main flaw in the argument. The main flaw is the assumption that lack of success automatically excludes the possibility of adaptation or revival. Therefore, this option is not the correct choice.
(C) equates the play's aesthetic worth with its commercial success.
This option suggests that the argument assumes that the play's commercial success is directly related to its aesthetic worth. However, the argument does not explicitly make this equation. It is focused on the play's success in terms of adaptation and revival, rather than aesthetic worth. Hence, this option is not the correct choice.
(D) presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival.
This option points out that the argument assumes that there are no other possibilities or avenues for the play's success besides adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival. However, the argument does not provide any justification or reasoning for this assumption. This lack of justification is indeed a flaw in the argument. Therefore, this option is a valid choice.
(E) fails to recognize that the play's not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival.
This option correctly identifies the flaw in the argument. The argument assumes that because the play is not successful, it will not meet the conditions for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival. However, it fails to consider that the play might satisfy different conditions or criteria for these opportunities. Thus, this option is the correct choice.
In conclusion, the correct answer is (E) fails to recognize that the play's not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festival.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Top Courses for GMAT

If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice If the play were successful, it would be adapted as a movie or revived at the Decade Festival. But it is not successful. We must, regrettably, conclude that it will neither become a movie nor be revived at the Decade Festival.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to draw the conclusion that the play will not both be adapted as a movie and be revived at the Decade Festival, rather than that it will do neitherb)fails to explain in exactly what way the play is unsuccessfulc)equates the play’s aesthetic worth with its commercial successd)presumes, without providing justification, that there are no further avenues for the play other than adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade Festivale)fails to recognize that the play’s not satisfying one sufficient condition does not preclude its satisfying a different sufficient condition for adaptation as a movie or revival at the Decade FestivalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev