GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Executive: We recently ran a set of advertise...
Start Learning for Free
Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.
The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?
- a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s cause
- b)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kind
- c)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instances
- d)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailable
- e)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable events
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print versio...
(A) Bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon's cause.
This option involves predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on information about the intensity of its cause. The executive's reasoning does not directly align with this option because they are not predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on the intensity of its cause. Instead, they are inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the limited response to website ads, which is not strictly related to predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on its cause.
This option involves predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on information about the intensity of its cause. The executive's reasoning does not directly align with this option because they are not predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on the intensity of its cause. Instead, they are inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the limited response to website ads, which is not strictly related to predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on its cause.
(B) Uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kind.
This option suggests using information about the typical frequency of events to make conclusions about the probability of a specific event. The executive's reasoning does not directly align with this option either because they are not drawing conclusions about the probability of a particular event based on the typical frequency of events. Instead, they are inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the observed response to website ads.
This option suggests using information about the typical frequency of events to make conclusions about the probability of a specific event. The executive's reasoning does not directly align with this option either because they are not drawing conclusions about the probability of a particular event based on the typical frequency of events. Instead, they are inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the observed response to website ads.
(C) Infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instances.
This option involves inferring a statistical generalization based on claims about a large number of specific instances. The executive's reasoning does not involve inferring a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of instances. Instead, they are making a specific inference about the consumer response to print ads based on the limited response to website ads.
This option involves inferring a statistical generalization based on claims about a large number of specific instances. The executive's reasoning does not involve inferring a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of instances. Instead, they are making a specific inference about the consumer response to print ads based on the limited response to website ads.
(D) Uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailable.
This option accurately describes the executive's reasoning. They use the available information about consumer response to the ads on the website (where direct evidence is available) to draw a conclusion about the consumer response to the print ads (where direct evidence is unavailable). The executive assumes that the limited response on the website indicates that the response to the print ads is also below par, drawing an inference from the available case to the analogous case.
This option accurately describes the executive's reasoning. They use the available information about consumer response to the ads on the website (where direct evidence is available) to draw a conclusion about the consumer response to the print ads (where direct evidence is unavailable). The executive assumes that the limited response on the website indicates that the response to the print ads is also below par, drawing an inference from the available case to the analogous case.
(E) Bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable events.
This option involves making predictions about future events based on facts about recent comparable events. The executive's reasoning does not involve making predictions about future events, but rather inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the observed response to website ads.
This option involves making predictions about future events based on facts about recent comparable events. The executive's reasoning does not involve making predictions about future events, but rather inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the observed response to website ads.
Among the options provided, option (D) accurately captures the reasoning used by the executive. They utilize a case with direct evidence (website ads) to draw a conclusion about an analogous case with indirect evidence (print ads).
Most Upvoted Answer
Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print versio...
Explanation:
Using a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailable:
The executive is using the information about consumer response to the ads on the website, for which direct information is available, to draw a conclusion about consumer response to the print ads, for which direct information is unavailable.
Comparison of consumer response:
By comparing the consumer response to the website ads and assuming that the print ads would have a similar response, the executive is making an inference about the effectiveness of the print ads based on the known response to the website ads.
Conclusion about print ads:
The executive concludes that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par because of the limited consumer response to the website ads. This reasoning implies that the executive is using the available information to make an educated guess about the effectiveness of the print ads.
Using a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailable:
The executive is using the information about consumer response to the ads on the website, for which direct information is available, to draw a conclusion about consumer response to the print ads, for which direct information is unavailable.
Comparison of consumer response:
By comparing the consumer response to the website ads and assuming that the print ads would have a similar response, the executive is making an inference about the effectiveness of the print ads based on the known response to the website ads.
Conclusion about print ads:
The executive concludes that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par because of the limited consumer response to the website ads. This reasoning implies that the executive is using the available information to make an educated guess about the effectiveness of the print ads.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print versio...
(A) Bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon's cause.
This option involves predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on information about the intensity of its cause. The executive's reasoning does not directly align with this option because they are not predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on the intensity of its cause. Instead, they are inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the limited response to website ads, which is not strictly related to predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on its cause.
This option involves predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on information about the intensity of its cause. The executive's reasoning does not directly align with this option because they are not predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on the intensity of its cause. Instead, they are inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the limited response to website ads, which is not strictly related to predicting the intensity of a phenomenon based on its cause.
(B) Uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kind.
This option suggests using information about the typical frequency of events to make conclusions about the probability of a specific event. The executive's reasoning does not directly align with this option either because they are not drawing conclusions about the probability of a particular event based on the typical frequency of events. Instead, they are inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the observed response to website ads.
This option suggests using information about the typical frequency of events to make conclusions about the probability of a specific event. The executive's reasoning does not directly align with this option either because they are not drawing conclusions about the probability of a particular event based on the typical frequency of events. Instead, they are inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the observed response to website ads.
(C) Infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instances.
This option involves inferring a statistical generalization based on claims about a large number of specific instances. The executive's reasoning does not involve inferring a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of instances. Instead, they are making a specific inference about the consumer response to print ads based on the limited response to website ads.
This option involves inferring a statistical generalization based on claims about a large number of specific instances. The executive's reasoning does not involve inferring a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of instances. Instead, they are making a specific inference about the consumer response to print ads based on the limited response to website ads.
(D) Uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailable.
This option accurately describes the executive's reasoning. They use the available information about consumer response to the ads on the website (where direct evidence is available) to draw a conclusion about the consumer response to the print ads (where direct evidence is unavailable). The executive assumes that the limited response on the website indicates that the response to the print ads is also below par, drawing an inference from the available case to the analogous case.
This option accurately describes the executive's reasoning. They use the available information about consumer response to the ads on the website (where direct evidence is available) to draw a conclusion about the consumer response to the print ads (where direct evidence is unavailable). The executive assumes that the limited response on the website indicates that the response to the print ads is also below par, drawing an inference from the available case to the analogous case.
(E) Bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable events.
This option involves making predictions about future events based on facts about recent comparable events. The executive's reasoning does not involve making predictions about future events, but rather inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the observed response to website ads.
This option involves making predictions about future events based on facts about recent comparable events. The executive's reasoning does not involve making predictions about future events, but rather inferring the consumer response to print ads based on the observed response to website ads.
Among the options provided, option (D) accurately captures the reasoning used by the executive. They utilize a case with direct evidence (website ads) to draw a conclusion about an analogous case with indirect evidence (print ads).
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Executive: We recently ran a set of advertisements in the print version of a travel magazine and on that magazine’s website. We were unable to get any direct information about consumer response to the print ads. However, we found that consumer response to the ads on the website was much more limited than is typical for website ads. We concluded that consumer response to the print ads was probably below par as well.The executive’s reasoning does which one of the following?a)bases a prediction of the intensity of a phenomenon on information about the intensity of that phenomenon’s causeb)uses information about the typical frequency of events of a general kind to draw a conclusion about the probability of a particular event of that kindc)infers a statistical generalization from claims about a large number of specific instancesd)uses a case in which direct evidence is available to draw a conclusion about an analogous case in which direct evidence is unavailablee)bases a prediction about future events on facts about recent comparable eventsCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup