All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  The use of a wood harvesting technique known ... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.
From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?
  • a)
    Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.
  • b)
    Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.
  • c)
    Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.
  • d)
    Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.
  • e)
    Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had ...
(A) Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.
This option suggests delaying the harvests to allow the trees to grow larger. While this may have some benefits, it does not directly address the environmental impacts of clear cutting, such as erosion and monoculture formation.
(B) Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.
This option addresses one of the negative impacts mentioned in the passage, namely the lack of mature trees after clear cutting. Selective harvesting allows for the preservation of some mature trees, which can help mitigate the negative effects on erosion and biodiversity.
(C) Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.
This option addresses one of the negative impacts mentioned in the passage, which is the susceptibility of new trees to disease and insect infestation. While insecticide spraying may help prevent infestation, it does not address the issue of erosion caused by clear cutting.
(D) Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.
This option suggests leaving certain areas untouched, which helps preserve biodiversity and mitigate the negative impacts of clear cutting. It directly addresses the issue of erosion mentioned in the passage.
(E) Planting monocultures, a single species of fast-growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.
This option is not a suitable solution as it exacerbates one of the negative impacts mentioned in the passage, namely the formation of monocultures that are highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.
Based on the passage, option (B) is the most appropriate technique to employ. Selective harvesting that leaves some mature trees standing helps reduce the negative impacts of clear cutting by preserving biodiversity and mitigating erosion.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Globally, about a third of the food produced for human consumption goes to waste, implying that a third of the water, land use, energy and financial resources that go into producing it are also squandered. Yet people often think of food as environmentally benign because it is biodegradable, while label food packaging as a wasteful use of resources leading to nothing but more pollution, despite the reality that the energy that goes into packaging makes up a mere 10% of the total energy that goes into producing, transporting, storing and preparing food. Needless to say, their view ignores the negative impact of food production, supply, and consumption, and the benefits possible from the right kind of food packaging.Indeed the dislike for food packaging is not all baseless. There is a lot of bad and wasteful packaging out there. But any assessment of its impact on the environment must take into account the benefits one can derive from packaging in the shape of reduced food waste that can be realized by protecting and dispensing food properly. For instance, two percent of the milk produced in the US goes bad on supermarket shelves before it can be purchased. This dairy waste can be avoided with packaging technology such as Tetra Pak that saves milk from spoiling, even without refrigeration. However, environmentally aware consumers tend to dislike Tetra Pak material because they think it cannot be recycled. The truth, however, is that it can be recycled, but the process is rather complicated. Irrespective of the recycling aspect, Tetra Pak is a good environmental bet because it can extend the shelf life of milk up to nine months, reducing the need for refrigeration and reducing the amount of milk that goes bad on retail shelves. Clearly, the environmental benefit of the food-protection technology outweighs the negative impact of the packaging itself.Which of the following is the function of the first paragraph in the passage?

Globally, about a third of the food produced for human consumption goes to waste, implying that a third of the water, land use, energy and financial resources that go into producing it are also squandered. Yet people often think of food as environmentally benign because it is biodegradable, while label food packaging as a wasteful use of resources leading to nothing but more pollution, despite the reality that the energy that goes into packaging makes up a mere 10% of the total energy that goes into producing, transporting, storing and preparing food. Needless to say, their view ignores the negative impact of food production, supply, and consumption, and the benefits possible from the right kind of food packaging.Indeed the dislike for food packaging is not all baseless. There is a lot of bad and wasteful packaging out there. But any assessment of its impact on the environment must take into account the benefits one can derive from packaging in the shape of reduced food waste that can be realized by protecting and dispensing food properly. For instance, two percent of the milk produced in the US goes bad on supermarket shelves before it can be purchased. This dairy waste can be avoided with packaging technology such as Tetra Pak that saves milk from spoiling, even without refrigeration. However, environmentally aware consumers tend to dislike Tetra Pak material because they think it cannot be recycled. The truth, however, is that it can be recycled, but the process is rather complicated. Irrespective of the recycling aspect, Tetra Pak is a good environmental bet because it can extend the shelf life of milk up to nine months, reducing the need for refrigeration and reducing the amount of milk that goes bad on retail shelves. Clearly, the environmental benefit of the food-protection technology outweighs the negative impact of the packaging itself.Which of the following statement can be derived from the passage?

Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.As urban landscapes continue to expand, the rise of vertical farming is becoming a crucial element in the quest for sustainable city living. Vertical farms, which grow crops in stacked layers within a controlled environment, offer a revolutionary approach to agriculture in urban settings. This innovative method of farming is not just about saving space; its about reimagining how we produce food in the face of growing environmental challenges.One of the key advantages of vertical farming is its minimal use of water and pesticides. Unlike traditional agriculture, which relies heavily on these resources, vertical farms use hydroponic systems that circulate water efficiently and eliminate the need for soil and large-scale pesticide use. This approach significantly reduces the environmental impact of farming.Another significant benefit is the reduction in food miles. Vertical farms can be established within urban areas, drastically cutting down the distance food travels from farm to consumer. This not only ensures fresher produce but also reduces transportation emissions, contributing to lower carbon footprints.However, vertical farming faces its own set of challenges. The initial setup and operational costs can be high, making it difficult for these farms to compete with traditional agriculture in terms of cost. Additionally, the energy requirements for maintaining controlled environments, such as lighting and temperature control, are substantial. Critics argue that unless renewable energy sources power these farms, they may not be as sustainable as they seem.Despite these challenges, the potential of vertical farming in reshaping urban agriculture remains immense. As technology advances, the efficiency of these farms is expected to improve, making them a vital component in the development of sustainable cities.Q.Based on the passage, which of the following can be inferred about vertical farms compared to traditional farms?

Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.As urban landscapes continue to expand, the rise of vertical farming is becoming a crucial element in the quest for sustainable city living. Vertical farms, which grow crops in stacked layers within a controlled environment, offer a revolutionary approach to agriculture in urban settings. This innovative method of farming is not just about saving space; its about reimagining how we produce food in the face of growing environmental challenges.One of the key advantages of vertical farming is its minimal use of water and pesticides. Unlike traditional agriculture, which relies heavily on these resources, vertical farms use hydroponic systems that circulate water efficiently and eliminate the need for soil and large-scale pesticide use. This approach significantly reduces the environmental impact of farming.Another significant benefit is the reduction in food miles. Vertical farms can be established within urban areas, drastically cutting down the distance food travels from farm to consumer. This not only ensures fresher produce but also reduces transportation emissions, contributing to lower carbon footprints.However, vertical farming faces its own set of challenges. The initial setup and operational costs can be high, making it difficult for these farms to compete with traditional agriculture in terms of cost. Additionally, the energy requirements for maintaining controlled environments, such as lighting and temperature control, are substantial. Critics argue that unless renewable energy sources power these farms, they may not be as sustainable as they seem.Despite these challenges, the potential of vertical farming in reshaping urban agriculture remains immense. As technology advances, the efficiency of these farms is expected to improve, making them a vital component in the development of sustainable cities.Q.Which of the following concerns about vertical farming is mentioned in the passage?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The use of a wood harvesting technique known as clear cutting has had two especially insidious environmental impacts. The first is that it causes erosion, as hillsides that were covered with mature trees are abruptly exposed to the full impact of the elements. The second is that when new trees grow in the area they are often nearly all of the same age and species and therefore highly susceptible to disease and insect infestation.From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that wood harvesting can continue with fewer negative impacts if which of the following techniques is employed?a)Waiting longer periods between harvests so that the trees will be larger when cut.b)Using selective harvesting techniques that leave some mature trees standing.c)Spraying areas that are clear cut with an insecticide to prevent infestation.d)Leaving some areas uncut, such as those near state parks and along roadsides.e)Planting monocultures, a single species of fast growing tree, in areas that have been clear cut.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup