Question Description
Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Although both white and black moths can be found in the relatively new industrial area of City X, the fact that only the white version can be found in the original, residential part of City X indicates that the black moth in City X is a recent evolutionary development. While the City X moth was originally white,mutant black moths living near the factories in the industrial area enjoyed a competitive survival advantage, since they blended in better with the sooty air and buildings.Also noteworthy is thatthe moths in nearby City Y, where there never were any factories, are all white.In the given argument, what role do the bold-faced selections play?a)The first is the arguments main conclusion; the second suggests an exception to that conclusion.b)The first is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion; the second is evidence in support of an alternative, rejected conclusion.c)The first is an interpretation of evidence offered in support of the main conclusion; the second is other evidence offered in support of the main conclusion.d)The first is an interpretation of evidence that would support an alternate conclusion; the second is evidence in support of the arguments main conclusion.e)They are both evidence offered in support of a conclusion that is rejected.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.