Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Principle: Copyright law protects only work. ... Start Learning for Free
Principle: Copyright law protects only work. 'Work' means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.

Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a movie

  • a)
    The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright law

  • b)
    The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional work

  • c)
    The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic work

  • d)
    The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producer's work

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graph...
In the present case, the acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright law. The object of copyright law is to support creators, writers, specialists and fashioners to make unique works by compensating them with the select appropriate for a restricted period to misuse the work for the fiscal increase.
Federal copyright law protects original creative works such as paintings, writing, architecture, movies, software, photos, dance, and music. A work must meet certain minimum requirements to qualify for copyright protection. The length of protection also varies depending on when the work was created or first published.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Copyrights are generally owned by the people who create the work of expression.Some exceptions:If a work is created by an employee in the course of his or her employment, the employer owns the copyright. If the work is created by an independent contractor and the independent contractor signs a written agreement stating that the work shall be made for hire, the commissioning person or organisation owns the copyright only if the work is a part of a larger literary work, such as an article in a magazine or a poem or story in an anthology; part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, such as a screenplay; a translation; a supplementary work such as an afterword, an introduction, chart, editorial note, bibliography; a compilation; an instructional text; a test or answer material for a test; or an atlas. Works that dont fall within one of these eight categories constitute works made for hire only if created by an employee within the scope of his or her employment.If the creator has sold the entire copyright, the purchasing business or person becomes the copyright owner.When two or more authors prepare a work with the intent to combine their contributions into inseparable or interdependent parts, the work is considered joint work and the authors are considered joint copyright owners. Authorship is retained but in some cases this copyright owner can be the publisher. Say a joint work is when a book or article has two or more authors. However, if a book is written primarily by one author, but another author contributes a specific chapter to the book and is given credit for that chapter, then this probably wouldnt be a joint work because the contributions arent inseparable or interdependent. The U.S. Copyright Office considers joint copyright owners to have an equal right to register and enforce the copyright. Unless the joint owners make a written agreement to the contrary, each copyright owner has the right to commercially exploit the copyright, provided that the other copyright owners get an equal share of the proceeds between them.If at the time of creation, the authors did not intend their works to be part of an inseparable whole, the fact that their works are later put together does not create a joint work. Rather, the result is considered a collective work. In this case, each author owns a copyright in only the material he or she added to the finished product. For example in the 1980s, Vladimir wrote a famous novel full of complex literary allusions. In 2018, his publisher issues a student edition of the work with detailed annotations. The student edition is a collective work. Vladimir owns the copyright in the novel, but the professor owns the annotations.Q.According to the article, what is the main difference between an author and a copyright holder?

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Copyrights are generally owned by the people who create the work of expression.Some exceptions:If a work is created by an employee in the course of his or her employment, the employer owns the copyright. If the work is created by an independent contractor and the independent contractor signs a written agreement stating that the work shall be made for hire, the commissioning person or organisation owns the copyright only if the work is a part of a larger literary work, such as an article in a magazine or a poem or story in an anthology; part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, such as a screenplay; a translation; a supplementary work such as an afterword, an introduction, chart, editorial note, bibliography; a compilation; an instructional text; a test or answer material for a test; or an atlas. Works that dont fall within one of these eight categories constitute works made for hire only if created by an employee within the scope of his or her employment.If the creator has sold the entire copyright, the purchasing business or person becomes the copyright owner.When two or more authors prepare a work with the intent to combine their contributions into inseparable or interdependent parts, the work is considered joint work and the authors are considered joint copyright owners. Authorship is retained but in some cases this copyright owner can be the publisher. Say a joint work is when a book or article has two or more authors. However, if a book is written primarily by one author, but another author contributes a specific chapter to the book and is given credit for that chapter, then this probably wouldnt be a joint work because the contributions arent inseparable or interdependent. The U.S. Copyright Office considers joint copyright owners to have an equal right to register and enforce the copyright. Unless the joint owners make a written agreement to the contrary, each copyright owner has the right to commercially exploit the copyright, provided that the other copyright owners get an equal share of the proceeds between them.If at the time of creation, the authors did not intend their works to be part of an inseparable whole, the fact that their works are later put together does not create a joint work. Rather, the result is considered a collective work. In this case, each author owns a copyright in only the material he or she added to the finished product. For example in the 1980s, Vladimir wrote a famous novel full of complex literary allusions. In 2018, his publisher issues a student edition of the work with detailed annotations. The student edition is a collective work. Vladimir owns the copyright in the novel, but the professor owns the annotations.Q.X is a part-time employee of a company called ZMY Infrastructures. X prepares a blueprint design of a building which is very much liked by the managers of the company. However, X has other plans and wants to move to another company with this same design. Can the other company claim copyright over it?

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Copyrights are generally owned by the people who create the work of expression.Some exceptions:If a work is created by an employee in the course of his or her employment, the employer owns the copyright. If the work is created by an independent contractor and the independent contractor signs a written agreement stating that the work shall be made for hire, the commissioning person or organisation owns the copyright only if the work is a part of a larger literary work, such as an article in a magazine or a poem or story in an anthology; part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, such as a screenplay; a translation; a supplementary work such as an afterword, an introduction, chart, editorial note, bibliography; a compilation; an instructional text; a test or answer material for a test; or an atlas. Works that dont fall within one of these eight categories constitute works made for hire only if created by an employee within the scope of his or her employment.If the creator has sold the entire copyright, the purchasing business or person becomes the copyright owner.When two or more authors prepare a work with the intent to combine their contributions into inseparable or interdependent parts, the work is considered joint work and the authors are considered joint copyright owners. Authorship is retained but in some cases this copyright owner can be the publisher. Say a joint work is when a book or article has two or more authors. However, if a book is written primarily by one author, but another author contributes a specific chapter to the book and is given credit for that chapter, then this probably wouldnt be a joint work because the contributions arent inseparable or interdependent. The U.S. Copyright Office considers joint copyright owners to have an equal right to register and enforce the copyright. Unless the joint owners make a written agreement to the contrary, each copyright owner has the right to commercially exploit the copyright, provided that the other copyright owners get an equal share of the proceeds between them.If at the time of creation, the authors did not intend their works to be part of an inseparable whole, the fact that their works are later put together does not create a joint work. Rather, the result is considered a collective work. In this case, each author owns a copyright in only the material he or she added to the finished product. For example in the 1980s, Vladimir wrote a famous novel full of complex literary allusions. In 2018, his publisher issues a student edition of the work with detailed annotations. The student edition is a collective work. Vladimir owns the copyright in the novel, but the professor owns the annotations.Q.X is an independent contractor. He orally asks Y to create a work for hire. The work will be part of the book which will be published by X. Who is the copyright owner of the work?

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Copyrights are generally owned by the people who create the work of expression.Some exceptions:If a work is created by an employee in the course of his or her employment, the employer owns the copyright. If the work is created by an independent contractor and the independent contractor signs a written agreement stating that the work shall be made for hire, the commissioning person or organisation owns the copyright only if the work is a part of a larger literary work, such as an article in a magazine or a poem or story in an anthology; part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, such as a screenplay; a translation; a supplementary work such as an afterword, an introduction, chart, editorial note, bibliography; a compilation; an instructional text; a test or answer material for a test; or an atlas. Works that dont fall within one of these eight categories constitute works made for hire only if created by an employee within the scope of his or her employment.If the creator has sold the entire copyright, the purchasing business or person becomes the copyright owner.When two or more authors prepare a work with the intent to combine their contributions into inseparable or interdependent parts, the work is considered joint work and the authors are considered joint copyright owners. Authorship is retained but in some cases this copyright owner can be the publisher. Say a joint work is when a book or article has two or more authors. However, if a book is written primarily by one author, but another author contributes a specific chapter to the book and is given credit for that chapter, then this probably wouldnt be a joint work because the contributions arent inseparable or interdependent. The U.S. Copyright Office considers joint copyright owners to have an equal right to register and enforce the copyright. Unless the joint owners make a written agreement to the contrary, each copyright owner has the right to commercially exploit the copyright, provided that the other copyright owners get an equal share of the proceeds between them.If at the time of creation, the authors did not intend their works to be part of an inseparable whole, the fact that their works are later put together does not create a joint work. Rather, the result is considered a collective work. In this case, each author owns a copyright in only the material he or she added to the finished product. For example in the 1980s, Vladimir wrote a famous novel full of complex literary allusions. In 2018, his publisher issues a student edition of the work with detailed annotations. The student edition is a collective work. Vladimir owns the copyright in the novel, but the professor owns the annotations.Q.Mint writes a short story which is based on his real-life experience. Yusz also writes a short story based on his real-life experience. One day, Mint shares his story to Yusz. Yusz is pleased to read the short story of Mint and now wants to publish both the stories in one book. Can both of them be called joint copyright holders?

Directions: The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Copyrights are generally owned by the people who create the work of expression.Some exceptions:If a work is created by an employee in the course of his or her employment, the employer owns the copyright. If the work is created by an independent contractor and the independent contractor signs a written agreement stating that the work shall be made for hire, the commissioning person or organisation owns the copyright only if the work is a part of a larger literary work, such as an article in a magazine or a poem or story in an anthology; part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, such as a screenplay; a translation; a supplementary work such as an afterword, an introduction, chart, editorial note, bibliography; a compilation; an instructional text; a test or answer material for a test; or an atlas. Works that dont fall within one of these eight categories constitute works made for hire only if created by an employee within the scope of his or her employment.If the creator has sold the entire copyright, the purchasing business or person becomes the copyright owner.When two or more authors prepare a work with the intent to combine their contributions into inseparable or interdependent parts, the work is considered joint work and the authors are considered joint copyright owners. Authorship is retained but in some cases this copyright owner can be the publisher. Say a joint work is when a book or article has two or more authors. However, if a book is written primarily by one author, but another author contributes a specific chapter to the book and is given credit for that chapter, then this probably wouldnt be a joint work because the contributions arent inseparable or interdependent. The U.S. Copyright Office considers joint copyright owners to have an equal right to register and enforce the copyright. Unless the joint owners make a written agreement to the contrary, each copyright owner has the right to commercially exploit the copyright, provided that the other copyright owners get an equal share of the proceeds between them.If at the time of creation, the authors did not intend their works to be part of an inseparable whole, the fact that their works are later put together does not create a joint work. Rather, the result is considered a collective work. In this case, each author owns a copyright in only the material he or she added to the finished product. For example in the 1980s, Vladimir wrote a famous novel full of complex literary allusions. In 2018, his publisher issues a student edition of the work with detailed annotations. The student edition is a collective work. Vladimir owns the copyright in the novel, but the professor owns the annotations.Q.X and Y are joint copyright holders of a work. X wants to commercially exploit the work and hence hands over the work to a publisher. The publisher agrees to publish only if the profit is shared in the ratio 2 : 1 : 1 between the publisher, X and Y. Is this agreement valid?

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: Copyright law protects only work. Work means cinemato graphic film but does not include performance by an actor in a cine matographic film.Facts: Alia Bhatt acted in a moviea)The acting of Alia Bhatt cannot be protected under copyright lawb)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law as professional workc)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected under copyright law only as an artistic workd)The acting of Alia Bhatt can be protected as film producers workCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev