GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teen...
Start Learning for Free
Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.
Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.
According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that it
- a)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licenses
- b)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the program
- c)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for years
- d)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving license
- e)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typical
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their att...
Let's go through each option and analyze them one by one:
(A) fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licenses
This option suggests that the West Virginia program may have failed because a significant portion of potential dropouts did not have driving licenses to begin with. However, this argument does not address the effectiveness of extraneous incentives in general, so it is not directly relevant to the weak point in Reva's claim.
This option suggests that the West Virginia program may have failed because a significant portion of potential dropouts did not have driving licenses to begin with. However, this argument does not address the effectiveness of extraneous incentives in general, so it is not directly relevant to the weak point in Reva's claim.
(B) doesn't provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the program
This option suggests that without specific dropout rate figures, it is difficult to determine the success or failure of the program. While the lack of precise data may weaken the argument, it does not directly address the effectiveness of extraneous incentives or Reva's claim. Therefore, it is not the weak point in Reva's claim.
This option suggests that without specific dropout rate figures, it is difficult to determine the success or failure of the program. While the lack of precise data may weaken the argument, it does not directly address the effectiveness of extraneous incentives or Reva's claim. Therefore, it is not the weak point in Reva's claim.
(C) ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for years
This option points out that there is evidence supporting the use of extrinsic incentives by parents and employers, which implies that such incentives can be effective. It challenges Reva's claim by highlighting the existence of positive results achieved through extraneous incentives. This is a strong response that undermines Reva's claim.
This option points out that there is evidence supporting the use of extrinsic incentives by parents and employers, which implies that such incentives can be effective. It challenges Reva's claim by highlighting the existence of positive results achieved through extraneous incentives. This is a strong response that undermines Reva's claim.
(D) assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving license
This option suggests that Reva assumes that positive and negative incentives have similar effectiveness, without considering that positive incentives may be more effective. However, Reva's claim is focused on the ineffectiveness of extraneous incentives in general, rather than comparing positive and negative incentives. Therefore, this option does not address the weak point in Reva's claim.
This option suggests that Reva assumes that positive and negative incentives have similar effectiveness, without considering that positive incentives may be more effective. However, Reva's claim is focused on the ineffectiveness of extraneous incentives in general, rather than comparing positive and negative incentives. Therefore, this option does not address the weak point in Reva's claim.
(E) is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typical
This option points out that Reva's claim is based on a single example, which is the West Virginia program. By highlighting the lack of generalizability, it weakens Reva's claim as it suggests that the failure of one program does not necessarily invalidate the effectiveness of extraneous incentives in all cases. This option directly addresses the weak point in Reva's claim.
This option points out that Reva's claim is based on a single example, which is the West Virginia program. By highlighting the lack of generalizability, it weakens Reva's claim as it suggests that the failure of one program does not necessarily invalidate the effectiveness of extraneous incentives in all cases. This option directly addresses the weak point in Reva's claim.
Therefore, the correct answer is (E) is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typical.
Most Upvoted Answer
Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their att...
Let's go through each option and analyze them one by one:
(A) fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licenses
This option suggests that the West Virginia program may have failed because a significant portion of potential dropouts did not have driving licenses to begin with. However, this argument does not address the effectiveness of extraneous incentives in general, so it is not directly relevant to the weak point in Reva's claim.
This option suggests that the West Virginia program may have failed because a significant portion of potential dropouts did not have driving licenses to begin with. However, this argument does not address the effectiveness of extraneous incentives in general, so it is not directly relevant to the weak point in Reva's claim.
(B) doesn't provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the program
This option suggests that without specific dropout rate figures, it is difficult to determine the success or failure of the program. While the lack of precise data may weaken the argument, it does not directly address the effectiveness of extraneous incentives or Reva's claim. Therefore, it is not the weak point in Reva's claim.
This option suggests that without specific dropout rate figures, it is difficult to determine the success or failure of the program. While the lack of precise data may weaken the argument, it does not directly address the effectiveness of extraneous incentives or Reva's claim. Therefore, it is not the weak point in Reva's claim.
(C) ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for years
This option points out that there is evidence supporting the use of extrinsic incentives by parents and employers, which implies that such incentives can be effective. It challenges Reva's claim by highlighting the existence of positive results achieved through extraneous incentives. This is a strong response that undermines Reva's claim.
This option points out that there is evidence supporting the use of extrinsic incentives by parents and employers, which implies that such incentives can be effective. It challenges Reva's claim by highlighting the existence of positive results achieved through extraneous incentives. This is a strong response that undermines Reva's claim.
(D) assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving license
This option suggests that Reva assumes that positive and negative incentives have similar effectiveness, without considering that positive incentives may be more effective. However, Reva's claim is focused on the ineffectiveness of extraneous incentives in general, rather than comparing positive and negative incentives. Therefore, this option does not address the weak point in Reva's claim.
This option suggests that Reva assumes that positive and negative incentives have similar effectiveness, without considering that positive incentives may be more effective. However, Reva's claim is focused on the ineffectiveness of extraneous incentives in general, rather than comparing positive and negative incentives. Therefore, this option does not address the weak point in Reva's claim.
(E) is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typical
This option points out that Reva's claim is based on a single example, which is the West Virginia program. By highlighting the lack of generalizability, it weakens Reva's claim as it suggests that the failure of one program does not necessarily invalidate the effectiveness of extraneous incentives in all cases. This option directly addresses the weak point in Reva's claim.
This option points out that Reva's claim is based on a single example, which is the West Virginia program. By highlighting the lack of generalizability, it weakens Reva's claim as it suggests that the failure of one program does not necessarily invalidate the effectiveness of extraneous incentives in all cases. This option directly addresses the weak point in Reva's claim.
Therefore, the correct answer is (E) is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typical.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Reva: Using extraneous incentives to get teenagers to change their attitude toward school and schoolwork won’t work. Take the program in West Virginia, for instance, where they tried to reduce their dropout rate by revoking the driving licenses of kids who left school. The program failed miserably.Anne: It’s true that the West Virginia program failed, but many schools have devised incentive programs that have been very successful in improving attendance and reducing discipline problems.According to Anne, the weak point in Reva’s claim is that ita)fails to consider the possibility that the majority of potential dropouts in West Virginia do not have driving licensesb)doesn’t provide any exact figures for the dropout rate in West Virginia before and during the programc)ignores a substantial body of evidence showing that parents and employers have been using extrinsic incentives with positive results for yearsd)assumes that a positive incentive—a prize or a reward—will be no more effective than a negative incentive, like the revoking of a driving licensee)is based on a single example, the incentive program in West Virginia, which may not be typicalCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup