GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Some employees have raised doubts about the m...
Start Learning for Free
Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.
The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility that
- a)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.
- b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.
- c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.
- d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.
- e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiali...
The argument states that some employees have raised doubts about the manager's impartiality in awarding performance ratings, specifically suggesting that he is biased towards female employees. The argument then presents some statistics to refute this claim, stating that the manager has given a rating of 4 or higher to 80% of the male employees and only 65% of the female employees. The conclusion drawn is that the manager has not discriminated against male employees.
To identify the flaw in the argument, we need to find an option that presents a possible alternative explanation or assumption that undermines the conclusion. Let's analyze the options provided:
(A) A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.
This option suggests that there were more male employees than female employees evaluated by the manager. However, this information doesn't directly address the manager's impartiality or bias.
This option suggests that there were more male employees than female employees evaluated by the manager. However, this information doesn't directly address the manager's impartiality or bias.
(B) Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.
This option suggests a general tendency among managers, but it doesn't specifically address the situation of the manager in question or the gender bias observed. Therefore, it is not directly relevant to the argument.
This option suggests a general tendency among managers, but it doesn't specifically address the situation of the manager in question or the gender bias observed. Therefore, it is not directly relevant to the argument.
(C) The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.
This option introduces a new factor of bias against male employees who complained to HR. While it addresses potential bias, it doesn't directly address the observed bias towards female employees or explain the discrepancy in performance ratings between male and female employees.
This option introduces a new factor of bias against male employees who complained to HR. While it addresses potential bias, it doesn't directly address the observed bias towards female employees or explain the discrepancy in performance ratings between male and female employees.
(D) The partiality against male employees that the manager is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.
This option suggests that the bias against male employees is limited to those who did not receive good ratings the previous year. However, this information doesn't directly address the observed bias towards female employees or explain why a higher percentage of male employees received good ratings compared to female employees.
This option suggests that the bias against male employees is limited to those who did not receive good ratings the previous year. However, this information doesn't directly address the observed bias towards female employees or explain why a higher percentage of male employees received good ratings compared to female employees.
(E) A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent of female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.
This option provides an alternative explanation for the observed bias. It suggests that a higher percentage of male employees deserved high ratings, while a lower percentage of female employees deserved them. This alternative explanation undermines the argument's conclusion that the manager's ratings were not biased against female employees.
This option provides an alternative explanation for the observed bias. It suggests that a higher percentage of male employees deserved high ratings, while a lower percentage of female employees deserved them. This alternative explanation undermines the argument's conclusion that the manager's ratings were not biased against female employees.
Therefore, the correct answer is (E) because it presents a plausible alternative explanation for the observed bias in the manager's ratings.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Some employees have raised doubts about the manager’s impartiality in awarding performance ratings. He was discovered to be biased towards female employees than towards male employees. But the record shows that he has given a rating of 4 or higher (upon 5) to 80% of the male employees under him while giving such ratings to only 65% of the female employees. This clearly shows that the manager has not discriminated against male employees during performance appraisal.The argument above is flawed in that it ignores the possibility thata)A large number of the employees whom the manager evaluated were male.b)Many managers find it difficult to be objective when awarding ratings to employees since they always have a personal bias/favorites.c)The manager is more biased against male employees who complained to HR department than the ones who did not.d)The partiality against male employees that the manger is accused of has been of male employees who did not get good ratings last year.e)A greater percent of male employees deserved to get 4+ ratings, while a smaller percent female employees should have got such ratings, than the final numbers.Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup