All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Principle: An agreement without free consent ... Start Learning for Free
Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.
Facts: A obtains the consent of 'B' to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of B's girlfriend.
  • a)
    'B' can enforce the agreement
  • b)
    'B' cannot enforce the agreement
  • c)
    Neither 'A' nor 'B' can enforce the agreement
  • d)
    'A' can enforce the agreement
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Humanities/Arts doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at t...
'B' can enforce the agreement. 
The clear illustration is consent obtained by point of a pistol , or by threatening to cause hurt. It is clear that coercion as thus defined implies a committing or threatening to commit some act which is a contract to law. Hence this agreement is void on the exception of B as he can either uphold the contract or reject it. Like in the case of Chikham Amiraju V Chikham Seshamma. 
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Arbitration has been the toast of the legal community for a long time. It has been long expected that arbitration will replace business litigation to a great extent one day. Lawyers have been encouraging parties to have an arbitration agreement in all their business transaction documents for more than two decades now. However, arbitration has not been proven to be effective too often.A lot of lawyers have begun to re-evaluate if they should put in those arbitration clauses blindly in the agreements they draft. Also, a lot of people who have already put in binding arbitration clauses in their agreements, are finding arbitration very difficult to navigate and too expensive when disputes actually arise.Even after 23 years since the introduction of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, arbitration seems to be slowly evolving and not really making a dent on pendency of litigation situation and more costly unlike litigation. The Act empowers the arbitrator to terminate the proceedings where without any sufficient cause, the claimant fails to communicate his statement of claim within the stipulated period. If the respondent fails to submit his statement of defence within the predetermined period, the arbitrator shall continue with the proceedings without treating such a failure in itself as an admission of claimants allegations.Would it ever become the mature alternative that Indian businesses can safely rely on for reliable, fast, efficient and cost-effective dispute resolution, especially given the terrible state of civil justice?The BN Srikrishna Committee Report on Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India states that a lack of governmental support to promote arbitration is also one of the reasons why arbitration has not become the most preferred way of resolution. The report goes on to suggest that there should be awareness programmes and training to make arbitration a more popular concept. However, such awareness campaigns are very unlikely to attract parties to arbitration given the way it functions at present.Quality of arbitration and arbitrators can often be suspect. The courts have settled the legal proposition that an arbitration agreement is not required to be in any particular form. Courts in India regularly interfere and do not respect party autonomy. The award is expected to be up for appeal or review in the higher courts and that really does not instill confidence in the parties involved in disputes. These factors are putting off parties from adopting arbitration. At present, it appears that only in a handful of matters involving very large claims, arbitration is still viable in India.Q.Rama and Bose agreed to an arbitration trial. On conclusion of the arbitration trial, Rama was awarded to indemnify Bose with Rs. 50,000 by the end of February 2020. During February 2020, Rama refused to pay Bose the said amount. Rama in defence said that the arbitration agreement was not in written form and hence doesnt bind him to indemnify Bose. Is the plea by Rama valid?

Directions: Read the following passage carefully:Arbitration has been the toast of the legal community for a long time. It has been long expected that arbitration will replace business litigation to a great extent one day. Lawyers have been encouraging parties to have an arbitration agreement in all their business transaction documents for more than two decades now. However, arbitration has not been proven to be effective too often.A lot of lawyers have begun to re-evaluate if they should put in those arbitration clauses blindly in the agreements they draft. Also, a lot of people who have already put in binding arbitration clauses in their agreements, are finding arbitration very difficult to navigate and too expensive when disputes actually arise.Even after 23 years since the introduction of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, arbitration seems to be slowly evolving and not really making a dent on pendency of litigation situation and more costly unlike litigation. The Act empowers the arbitrator to terminate the proceedings where without any sufficient cause, the claimant fails to communicate his statement of claim within the stipulated period. If the respondent fails to submit his statement of defence within the predetermined period, the arbitrator shall continue with the proceedings without treating such a failure in itself as an admission of claimants allegations.Would it ever become the mature alternative that Indian businesses can safely rely on for reliable, fast, efficient and cost-effective dispute resolution, especially given the terrible state of civil justice?The BN Srikrishna Committee Report on Institutionalisation of Arbitration Mechanism in India states that a lack of governmental support to promote arbitration is also one of the reasons why arbitration has not become the most preferred way of resolution. The report goes on to suggest that there should be awareness programmes and training to make arbitration a more popular concept. However, such awareness campaigns are very unlikely to attract parties to arbitration given the way it functions at present.Quality of arbitration and arbitrators can often be suspect. The courts have settled the legal proposition that an arbitration agreement is not required to be in any particular form. Courts in India regularly interfere and do not respect party autonomy. The award is expected to be up for appeal or review in the higher courts and that really does not instill confidence in the parties involved in disputes. These factors are putting off parties from adopting arbitration. At present, it appears that only in a handful of matters involving very large claims, arbitration is still viable in India.Q.According to the passage, what is a necessary component to enable arbitration between parties in a dispute?

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: An agreement without free consent can be enforces only at the option of the party whose consent was not free.Facts: A obtains the consent of B to enter into an agreement by putting a gun on the head of Bs girlfriend.a)B can enforce the agreementb)B cannot enforce the agreementc)Neither A nor B can enforce the agreementd)A can enforce the agreementCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup