All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no o... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.
The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argument
  • a)
    fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beings
  • b)
    confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesis
  • c)
    interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theory
  • d)
    makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”
  • e)
    relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusion
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in e...
In the statement is flawed and based on several assumptions that are not necessarily true.

Firstly, the statement assumes that the lack of success in exchanging messages with intelligent life or proving the existence of extraterrestrial life implies its nonexistence. However, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because we haven't found evidence yet, doesn't mean that intelligent life doesn't exist elsewhere in the universe.

Secondly, the statement assumes that astronomers' efforts are exhaustive and representative of all possible methods of detecting or contacting extraterrestrial life. However, our current technological capabilities and methods of searching for extraterrestrial life are limited. There might be forms of life or communication that we are unable to detect or understand at the moment.

Furthermore, the statement assumes that intelligent life can only exist in a way that is recognizable or understandable by humans. It is possible that intelligent life on other planets might have completely different forms of communication or technology that we are currently unable to comprehend.

Lastly, the statement assumes that Earth is the only planet capable of supporting intelligent life. Given the vastness of the universe and the countless number of potentially habitable planets, it is statistically unlikely that Earth is the only planet where intelligent life exists.

In conclusion, the argument that there is no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth is based on flawed assumptions and lacks sufficient evidence. It is premature to make such a definitive statement until further exploration and technological advancements are made.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in e...
Option (A) fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beings.
This option does not accurately describe the flaw in the argument's reasoning. The argument does not address the possibility of extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beings. The flaw lies in the argument's assumption that the absence of evidence for intelligent extraterrestrial life is evidence against its existence, rather than considering alternative possibilities.
Option (B) confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesis.
This option accurately describes the flaw in the argument's reasoning. The argument assumes that because there is no evidence of intelligent extraterrestrial life, it is evidence against the existence of such life. However, the absence of evidence does not necessarily prove the non-existence of something. It is possible that evidence has not yet been discovered or that the methods used to search for it have been insufficient.
Option (C) interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theory.
This option does not accurately describe the flaw in the argument's reasoning. The argument does not involve a disagreement over a scientific theory. It is focused on the absence of evidence and making a conclusion based on that absence.
Option (D) makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term "life."
This option does not accurately describe the flaw in the argument's reasoning. The argument does not rely on the vagueness of the term "life" in making its conclusion. It is concerned with the absence of evidence for intelligent extraterrestrial life and drawing a conclusion based on that absence.
Option (E) relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusion.
This option does not accurately describe the flaw in the argument's reasoning. The argument does not rely on an analogy to draw its conclusion. It is based on the absence of evidence for intelligent extraterrestrial life and making a conclusion based on that absence.
In summary, option (B) is the most accurate description of the flaw in the argument's reasoning, as it correctly identifies the confusion between the absence of evidence and evidence against a hypothesis.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Over the past 20,000 years, the average volume of the human male brain has decreased from 1,500 cubic centimeters to 1,350 cc, losing a chunk the size of a tennis ball. The female brain has shrunk by about the same proportion. If our brain keeps dwindling at this rate over the next 20,000 years, it will start to approach the size of the brain found in Homo erectus, a relative that lived half a million years ago and had a brain volume of only 1,100 cc.Some believe the erosion of our gray matter means that modern humans are indeed getting dumber. A common measure of intelligence - the encephalization quotient or EQ, defined as the ratio of brain volume to body mass - has been found to be decreasing in the recent past. Recent studies of human fossils suggest the brain shrank more quickly than the body in near-modern times. More importantly, analysis of the genome casts doubt on the notion that modern humans are simply daintier but otherwise identical versions of our ancestors, right down to how we think and feel. Another study concluded that our present EQ is the same as that of the Cro-Magnons - our ancestors who lived 30,000 years ago in Europe and were known more for brawniness rather than brilliance.On the other hand, other anthropologists such as Hawks believe that as the brain shrank, its wiring became more efficient, transforming us into quicker, more agile thinkers. They explain the shrinking by arguing that over the very period that the brain shrank, our DNA accumulated numerous adaptive mutations related to brain development and neurotransmitter systemsan indication that even as the organ got smaller, its inner workings changed.This explanation may be plausible, considering that the brain is such a glutton for fuel that it globs up to 20% of all the calories. To optimize this, the evolution may be moving towards a more efficient smaller brain that yields the most intelligence for the least energy. A boom in the human population in the last 20,000 years ago greatly improved the odds of such a fortuitous development since the more the individuals, the bigger the gene pool, and the greater the chance for an unusual advantageous mutation to happen.The man-made product that is closest to the brain, the microprocessor, has seen similar evolution. A microprocessor consists of transistors- the human equivalent of neuron that participates in decision making connected with wires that act as messengers between neurons. The first microprocessors had extremely simple architectures and were not optimized for a certain set of tasks but were more general purpose. Consequently, a lot of the power they consumed was dissipated in internal wiring and not in decision making. With refinements, the architectures became more and more attuned to the tasks that the microprocessor most commonly needed to do. Consequently, for the same number of transistors the amount of wiring decreased by a factor of 3 while the microprocessors processing speed increased by a factor of 10. While active research is still to conclude whether the same holds true in case of the brain, one can only hope that the results are along the lines of the microprocessor.Which of the following if true would weaken the assertion that humans are getting dumber with the erosion of brain volume?

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow:To account for the conformation of the Alps, two hypotheses have been advanced, which may be respectively named the hypothesis of fracture and the hypothesis of erosion. The former assumes that the forces by which the mountains were elevated produced fissures in the earth’s crust, and that the valleys of the Alps are the tracks of these fissures; the latter maintains that the valleys have been cut out by the action of ice and water, the mountains themselves being the residual forms of this grand sculpture. I had heard the Via Mala cited as a conspicuous illustration of the fissure theory - the profound chasm thus named, and through which the Hinter-Rhein now flows, could, it was alleged, be nothing else than a crack in the earth’s crust. To the Via Mala I therefore went in 1864 to instruct myself upon the point in question.The gorge commences about a quarter of an hour above Tusis and, on entering it, the first impression certainly is that it must be a fissure. This conclusion in my case was modified as I advanced. Some distance up the gorge I found upon the slopes to my right quantities of rolled stones, evidently rounded by water-action. Still further up, and just before reaching the first bridge which spans the chasm, I found more rolled stones, associated with sand and gravel. Through this mass of detritus, fortunately, a vertical cutting had been made, which exhibited a section showing perfect stratification. There was no agency in the place to roll these stones, and to deposit these alternating layers of sand and pebbles, but the river which now rushes some hundreds of feet below them. At one period of the Via Mala’s history the river must have run at this high level. Other evidences of water-action soon revealed themselves. From the parapet of the first bridge I could see the solid rock 200 feet above the bed of the river scooped and eroded.Q.What is the primary purpose of the author in writing the passage?

Often it was believed that super intelligence leads to financial success, but a study by Malcolm Gadwall identified determination as the most important predictor of success. It certainly helps to be smart, but there are plenty of people as smart as Bill Gates who have achieved next to nothing. The study further concluded that there are aspects called components of determination that are more relevant than others, and more importantly, some of these components can be cultivated while others are innate. One of these components sheer willfulness, the desire to get something when you want it, no matter what is most important. Unfortunately, the study concluded that a good deal of willfulness must be inborn because it is common to see families in which one sibling has much more of it than the other sibling. Circumstances can alter it, but at the high end of the scale, nature seems to be more important than nurture. But a strong willed person needs to be disciplined and not self-indulgent, making discipline the second component of determination. Hence, determination implies your willfulness is balanced by discipline. This is because the stronger your will, the less anyone will be able to argue with you except yourself, and someone should argue with you because everyone has base impulses, but if you have more will than discipline youll just give into these impulses and as a result end up on a local maximum such as drug addiction. Another important thing that the study concludes is that discipline can be cultivated, and in fact does tend to vary quite a lot in the course of an individuals life, and since determination is the product of will and discipline, you can become more determined by being more disciplined. The last component that the study discovered another malleable one is ambition. If willfulness and discipline are what get you to your destination, ambition is how you choose it and the fact that ambition is malleable means there is a lot you can do to increase it. Hence to summarize, determination consists of willfulness balanced with discipline and aimed by ambition - fortunately at least two of these three qualities can be cultivated.The author is primarily concerned with:Acomparing and contrasting the roles played by intelligence and determination as a predictor of financial success.

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow.The Law of Nations is founded, I have said, on the general principles of right and justice, on the broad fundamental distinctions between right and wrong, or as Montesquieu defines it, “on the principle that nations ought in time of peace to do each as much good, and in time of war as little harm as possible.” These are the principles from which any rule must be shown to spring, before it can be said to be a rule for international guidance. But what are the principles of right and wrong? These are not left to the individual reason of the interpreter of the law for the time being, but are to be decided by the public opinion of the civilized world, as it stands at the time when the case arises.It may immediately be asked—How is that public opinion to be ascertained? The answer is—By ascertaining the differences in opinion between the present and the past. For this purpose it must be observed, that the views of a past age are easily ascertainable, in matters of law, from theoretical writings, history, and judicial decisions; and these views may be reduced to definition. Modern universal intelligence will either agree or disagree in these views. In the mass of instances it will agree, as progress on such points is at all times slow; and not only will the points of disagreement be few, but they will be salient, striking, and generally of popular notoriety. Present, universal, or international opinion, has therefore two portions. 1. That in which it accords with the views of a past generation, which has become historical. 2. That in which it differs from or contradicts those views.Q.According to the passage, why is modern universal intelligence most likely to agree with the pastviews in majority of the cases?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Despite the best efforts of astronomers, no one has yet succeeded in exchanging messages with intelligent life on other planets or in other solar systems. In fact, no one has even managed to prove that any kind of extraterrestrial life exists. Thus, there is clearly no intelligent life anywhere but on Earth.The argument’s reasoning is flawed because the argumenta)fails to consider that there might be extraterrestrial forms of intelligence that are not living beingsb)confuses an absence of evidence for a hypothesis with the existence of evidence against the hypothesisc)interprets a disagreement over a scientific theory as a disproof of that theoryd)makes an inference that relies on the vagueness of the term “life”e)relies on a weak analogy rather than on evidence to draw a conclusionCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup