All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  In the past, most children who went sledding ... Start Learning for Free
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.
Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?
  • a)
    A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
  • b)
    Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
  • c)
    Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
  • d)
    Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
  • e)
    Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your GMAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Ver...
Let's examine each answer choice:
(A) A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
  • This answer choice does not directly weaken the evidence. The fact that a few children still use wooden sleds does not necessarily negate the claim that plastic sleds are more dangerous.
(B) Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
  • While the lack of protective gear may contribute to injuries, it does not specifically address the comparison between plastic and wooden sleds. Therefore, this answer choice does not significantly undermine the evidence.
(C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
  • This answer choice weakens the evidence provided. If plastic sleds can be used in a wider variety of snow conditions, it suggests that the increase in injuries may not be solely due to the switch to plastic sleds. Other factors, such as varying snow conditions, could contribute to the higher injury rate.
(D) Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
  • This answer choice does not directly weaken the evidence. While it provides information about the causes of injuries, it does not address the comparison between plastic and wooden sleds.
(E) Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
  • This answer choice also does not directly weaken the evidence. It explains a scenario where multiple children can be injured in a single accident involving a wooden sled, but it does not address the higher overall injury rate associated with plastic sleds.
Among the options, answer choice (C) is the one that most significantly weakens the force of the evidence. It suggests that the higher number of injuries could be attributed to other factors related to snow conditions rather than solely to the type of sled used.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Ver...
Let's examine each answer choice:
(A) A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
  • This answer choice does not directly weaken the evidence. The fact that a few children still use wooden sleds does not necessarily negate the claim that plastic sleds are more dangerous.
(B) Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
  • While the lack of protective gear may contribute to injuries, it does not specifically address the comparison between plastic and wooden sleds. Therefore, this answer choice does not significantly undermine the evidence.
(C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
  • This answer choice weakens the evidence provided. If plastic sleds can be used in a wider variety of snow conditions, it suggests that the increase in injuries may not be solely due to the switch to plastic sleds. Other factors, such as varying snow conditions, could contribute to the higher injury rate.
(D) Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
  • This answer choice does not directly weaken the evidence. While it provides information about the causes of injuries, it does not address the comparison between plastic and wooden sleds.
(E) Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
  • This answer choice also does not directly weaken the evidence. It explains a scenario where multiple children can be injured in a single accident involving a wooden sled, but it does not address the higher overall injury rate associated with plastic sleds.
Among the options, answer choice (C) is the one that most significantly weakens the force of the evidence. It suggests that the higher number of injuries could be attributed to other factors related to snow conditions rather than solely to the type of sled used.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with oil wells’ potential contamination of groundwater—fresh water within the earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled in such a way as to protect the oil, but no thought was given to the possibility that the groundwater itself might need protection until many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil contaminated water.The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. Consequently, without appropriate safeguards, wells that penetrate both groundwater and oil or saline water formations inevitably contaminate the groundwater. Initial attempts to prevent this contamination consisted of sealing off the groundwater formations with some form of protective barrier to prevent the oil flowing up the well from entering or mixing with the natural groundwater reservoir. This method, which is still in use today, initially involved using hollow trees to seal off the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, the hazards of insufficient knowledge persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up the well, or because of dissolution of the cement by these fluids. The effects of groundwater bacteria, traffic vibrations, and changing groundwater chemistry are likewise unassessed. Further, there is no guarantee that wells drilled in compliance with existing regulations will not expose a need for research in additional areas: on the west coast of North America, a major disaster recently occurred because a well’s location was based on a poor understanding of the area’s subsurface geology. Because the well was drilled in a channel accessing the ocean, not only was the area’s groundwater completely contaminated, but widespread coastal contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.The author’s attitude regarding oil well drilling regulations can most accurately be described as

Traditional regional performing arts groups across the country provide an important service to small communities. Most of these groups focus on the performance of time-honored material and offer people within the communities an opportunity to experience excellent traditional performances without having to travel far. Unfortunately, federal funding tends to support avant-garde groups whose focus is largely on progressive material. Although these groups are unquestionably an essential facet of the performing arts, they do not generally draw as wide of audiences and thus are receiving an undue amount of federal funding for the service that they provide to a community and the return on the federal investment. Those responsible for providing federal grants to performing arts groups should reconsider the allotment of funding in order to favor traditional performing arts groups with respect to their service to a community.The argument in the passage above proceeds by

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?a)A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.b)Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.c)Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.d)Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.e)Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup