- Strengths:
- Emphasizes individual rights and freedoms, which can promote social equality and reduce disparities.
- Supports free-market capitalism, which can stimulate economic growth and reduce poverty through wealth creation.
- Encourages social welfare programs to provide a safety net for the disadvantaged.
- Weaknesses:
- Overemphasis on individualism and free-market principles can lead to inequality and neglect of vulnerable groups.
- Limited government intervention may not effectively address systemic issues causing poverty and social disparities.
- Social welfare programs can be costly and may discourage individual responsibility and self-reliance.


- Strengths:
- Focuses on collective ownership and distribution of resources, aiming to reduce inequality and eliminate poverty.
- Advocates for comprehensive social welfare programs to ensure basic needs are met for all.
- Promotes social justice and equal opportunities through government intervention and regulation.
- Weaknesses:
- Centralized planning and control may limit economic efficiency and innovation, hindering overall prosperity.
- Heavy reliance on the state can lead to government inefficiency, corruption, and lack of individual freedoms.
- Equality of outcome may discourage individual efforts and innovation, hindering economic growth.


- Strengths:
- Emphasizes tradition, stability, and gradual change, which can provide social cohesion and prevent social upheaval.
- Supports free-market capitalism, which can generate economic growth and reduce poverty.
- Encourages personal responsibility and self-reliance, which can empower individuals to overcome poverty and disparities.
- Weaknesses:
- Tendency to resist social change may perpetuate inequalities and hinder progress in addressing global disparities.
- Limited government intervention may overlook systemic issues and fail to provide adequate support for the marginalized.
- Overemphasis on personal responsibility may neglect structural barriers that contribute to poverty and social disparities.


- Strengths:
- Focuses on gender equality, which can address social disparities and empower marginalized groups.
- Advocates for policies promoting equal opportunities, access to education, and healthcare for all genders.
- Challenges patriarchal norms and systems that perpetuate inequality and discrimination.
- Weaknesses:
- Can be criticized for neglecting other dimensions of inequality beyond gender, such as class or race.
- May face resistance from traditional power structures, hindering the implementation of gender equality policies.
- Different feminist perspectives may have conflicting approaches to addressing poverty and social disparities.

Overall, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of political ideologies in addressing global inequalities, poverty, and social disparities requires considering their core principles, policy implications, and potential outcomes. It is important to recognize that no single ideology can provide a comprehensive solution, and a combination of approaches may be necessary to effectively address these complex challenges.