Introduction:
When attempting mock tests, it is important to have a strategic approach to maximize efficiency and accuracy. The decision to stick to a fixed order or adopt a flexible approach depends on various factors such as individual strengths and weaknesses, time management, and the specific requirements of the test. Let's examine both approaches in detail to understand their pros and cons.

Fixed Order Approach:
The fixed order approach involves attempting questions in a predetermined sequence. This approach may be beneficial in certain scenarios, including:

1. Building confidence: Starting with easier questions can boost confidence and provide a momentum to tackle more challenging questions later.
2. Time management: A fixed order can help allocate time to each section or question type, ensuring that all questions are attempted within the given time frame.
3. Reducing decision-making burden: Having a set order eliminates the need to constantly decide which question to attempt next, allowing the test-taker to focus solely on solving the questions.

However, this approach may have limitations as well:

1. Limited flexibility: The fixed order may not align with the test-taker's strengths and weaknesses, potentially leading to time wastage on difficult questions or rushing through easy ones.
2. Missing out on easy marks: Some mock tests may have questions that are strategically placed to test the test-taker's ability to identify easier questions. A fixed order approach may overlook such opportunities, resulting in missed easy marks.
3. Increased pressure: If a test-taker struggles with the initial questions in a fixed order, it can create unnecessary pressure and affect performance in subsequent questions.

Flexible Approach:
The flexible approach involves adapting the order of attempting questions based on individual preferences and strengths. This approach offers several advantages:

1. Optimal utilization of strengths: A flexible approach allows test-takers to prioritize questions they are confident about, increasing the chances of earning higher marks in those areas.
2. Maximizing time efficiency: By quickly identifying and attempting easier questions first, test-takers can save time and allocate more effort to complex questions.
3. Reducing stress: When test-takers have the freedom to choose the order, they may feel more in control, leading to reduced stress and improved overall performance.

However, there are some considerations with the flexible approach:

1. Decision-making time: Frequent decision-making on question selection may consume valuable time, especially if test-takers are indecisive or unsure about their strengths.
2. Overlooking important questions: In the absence of a fixed order, there is a risk of unintentionally skipping or not giving enough attention to important questions, resulting in lower marks.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, whether to stick to a fixed order or adopt a flexible approach in mock tests depends on the individual's preferences and test requirements. While a fixed order provides structure and reduces decision-making burden, a flexible approach allows for better time management and utilization of strengths. It is recommended to experiment with both approaches during practice tests and determine which approach yields better results based on personal performance and comfort level.