GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Ravi: The highest priority should be given to... Start Learning for Free
Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.
Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.
Ed criticizes Ravi's argument by pointing out:
  • a)
    That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the company's success as a whole.
  • b)
    The ambiguity of term "highest priority".
  • c)
    That the departments other than sales are more vital to the company's success.
  • d)
    An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a department's necessity earns it the highest priority.
  • e)
    That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales d...
(A) That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the company's success as a whole.
  • This answer choice does not directly address Ed's criticism. Ed is not arguing whether the sales department is critical or not, but rather pointing out that there are other departments that are also important for the company's success.
(B) The ambiguity of term "highest priority".
  • This answer choice does not directly address Ed's criticism either. While it points out a potential ambiguity in Ravi's statement, it does not specifically critique the assumption that it is impossible to give the highest priority to all departments.
(C) That the departments other than sales are more vital to the company's success.
  • This answer choice aligns with Ed's criticism. Ed is suggesting that there are other departments besides sales that are vital to the company's success, indicating that they should also be given high priority. Therefore, this answer choice is a potential candidate.
(D) An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a department's necessity earns it the highest priority.
  • This answer choice directly addresses Ed's criticism. Ed is pointing out the flaw in Ravi's assumption that a department's necessity automatically earns it the highest priority. By highlighting the absurd consequence of this assumption, Ed effectively criticizes Ravi's argument. This answer choice is a strong candidate.
(E) That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.
  • This answer choice does not directly address Ed's criticism. Ed is not arguing about the generalization made by Ravi, but rather pointing out that there are other departments that are also important for the company's success.
After evaluating each answer choice, we can see that the most relevant and accurate criticism made by Ed is captured in answer choice (D). Therefore, the correct answer is (D).
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The recruitment and development of talent is a growing priority for many organizations, and is increasingly regarded as an important competitive advantage. One example of this emphasis on talent development is the creation of so-called ‘C’ level executive roles—Chief Talent or Personnel Officer—that represent the interests of the Human Resources department. This is a significant change from past years, during which Human Resources was generally considered a lower priority, even a necessary evil, and a destination for executives that did not thrive in other departments.This change has had an important beneficiary—women.An extraordinarily high proportion of Human Resources departments are run by women, reflecting the composition of the departments themselves. For better or worse, Human Resources positions have long been perceived as natural roles for women, as women are generally regarded as more nurturing and service-oriented than their male counterparts. As these traits are considered core to the functioning of effective Human Resources personnel, the advancement of women within HR departments has been routine and that, in turn, has attracted more women. Additionally, the lifestyle of workers in the Human Resources department is often not as demanding in terms of hours and weekends worked as it is for workers in other departments; many women with children find this appealing.The preponderance of female heads of Human Resources departments and the higher prioritization of talent development have combined to give many female executives increased authority and influence. Many women, after performing well in a Human Resources capacity, have been given additional responsibilities in other departments. Also, more female executives have been asked to represent their organizations at industry conferences, further increasing their visibility.Q.The passage suggests which of the following about the “additional responsibilities” cited in the second sentence of the third paragraph?

American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard. A recently conducted independent study shows that in the business world, social and political skills have become the real key to getting ahead in organisations, skills that successful managers use to their advantage. The study found out that successful managers, those who get promoted relatively quickly vis--vis effective managers, perform day to day activities that are more or less dissimilar to the ones conducted by effective managers or those who have satisfied, committed subordinates, in addition to high performing units. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that networking, which consists of socializing or politicking and interacting with others, was one activity that, out of the core four activities among the plethora of activities performed by managers, topped the list for successful managers but was ranked the lowest in the list of activities performed by the effective ones. Indeed the findings of the study do not negate the reality that there are managers who strike a balance between the activities performed by both types of managers and hence are successful and effective at the same time, but the meagre percentage such managers formed of the studys sample, barely ten percent, affirms the general divide between successful and effective managers.These findings clearly belie the traditional assumption typically suggested by formal personnel policies that promotions are based purely on performance. In effect, the studys implications affirm the cynical, yet what now seems real, view that people who are not necessarily the most accomplishing in terms of performing well in the other three key activity areas, namely communication, traditional management, and human resource management, are being promoted to the top level. Therefore, American companies looking to improve their performance and productivity need to ensure that formal rewards, especially promotions, are tied to performance. This way companies will be promoting a work-culture that turns effective managers in to successful managers and gives the currently successful managers a chance to effectively focus on productivity and not just on socializing and politicking.Each of the following can be inferred from the passage EXCEPT

Read the passage and answer the question given below.American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard. A recently conducted independent study shows that in the business world, social and political skills have become the real key to getting ahead in organisations, skills that successful managers use to their advantage. The study found out that successful managers, those who get promoted relatively quickly vis-à-vis effective managers, perform day to day activities that are more or less dissimilar to the ones conducted by effective managers or those who have satisfied, committed subordinates, in addition to high performing units. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that networking, which consists of socializing or politicking and interacting with others, was one activity that, out of the core four activities among the plethora of activities performed by managers, topped the list for successful managers but was ranked the lowest in the list of activities performed by the effective ones. Indeed the findings of the study do not negate the reality that there are managers who strike a balance between the activities performed by both types of managers and hence are successful and effective at the same time, but the meagre percentage such managers formed of the study’s sample, barely ten percent, affirms the general divide between successful and effective managers.These findings clearly belie the traditional assumption typically suggested by formal personnel policies that promotions are based purely on performance. In effect, the study’s implications affirm the cynical, yet what now seems real, view that people who are not necessarily the most accomplishing in terms of performing well in the other three key activity areas, namely communication, traditional management, and human resource management, are being promoted to the top level. Therefore, American companies looking to improve their performance and productivity need to ensure that formal rewards, especially promotions, are tied to performance. This way companies will be promoting a work-culture that turns effective managers in to successful managers and gives the currently successful managers a chance to effectively focus on productivity and not just on socializing and politicking.Q. Which of the following is mentioned in the passage?

American companies may find the solution to their performance related problems in their own backyard. A recently conducted independent study shows that in the business world, social and political skills have become the real key to getting ahead in organisations, skills that successful managers use to their advantage. The study found out that successful managers, those who get promoted relatively quickly vis--vis effective managers, perform day to day activities that are more or less dissimilar to the ones conducted by effective managers or those who have satisfied, committed subordinates, in addition to high performing units. Accordingly, it comes as no surprise that networking, which consists of socializing or politicking and interacting with others, was one activity that, out of the core four activities among the plethora of activities performed by managers, topped the list for successful managers but was ranked the lowest in the list of activities performed by the effective ones. Indeed the findings of the study do not negate the reality that there are managers who strike a balance between the activities performed by both types of managers and hence are successful and effective at the same time, but the meagre percentage such managers formed of the studys sample, barely ten percent, affirms the general divide between successful and effective managers.These findings clearly belie the traditional assumption typically suggested by formal personnel policies that promotions are based purely on performance. In effect, the studys implications affirm the cynical, yet what now seems real, view that people who are not necessarily the most accomplishing in terms of performing well in the other three key activity areas, namely communication, traditional management, and human resource management, are being promoted to the top level. Therefore, American companies looking to improve their performance and productivity need to ensure that formal rewards, especially promotions, are tied to performance. This way companies will be promoting a work-culture that turns effective managers in to successful managers and gives the currently successful managers a chance to effectively focus on productivity and not just on socializing and politicking.The author is primarily concerned with

Top Courses for GMAT

Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Ravi: The highest priority should be given to the needs of the sales dept., because without successful sales the company as a whole would fail.Ed: There are several departments other than sales that must also function successfully for the company to succeed. It is impossible to give the highest priority to all of them.Ed criticizes Ravis argument by pointing out:a)That the sales department taken by itself is not critical to the companys success as a whole.b)The ambiguity of term "highest priority".c)That the departments other than sales are more vital to the companys success.d)An absurd consequence of its apparent assumption that a departments necessity earns it the highest priority.e)That Ravi makes a generalization from an atypical case.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev