The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The officialandrsquo;s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > The local agricultural official gave the frui...

Join the Discussion on the App

The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?

a)
peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticide
b)
peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticide
c)
pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticide
d)
pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticide
e)
pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticide

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Inference

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District...

This question presents a scenario where fruit growers in District 10 Farmers Cooperative applied a new pesticide to their pear orchards for three years, replacing the old pesticide. During this period, the proportion of pears lost to insects decreased significantly compared to the previous three-year period. The local agricultural official concludes that the new pesticide is more effective than the old pesticide in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.

To support this conclusion, we need to find a group of trees that did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects. Let's analyze each option:

(A) Peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticide.

This option is not relevant because it does not pertain to pear trees, which is the focus of the conclusion.

(B) Peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticide.

This option does not provide evidence against the conclusion because it involves peach trees, not pear trees.

(C) Pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticide.

This option directly contradicts the conclusion. If pear trees treated with the old pesticide showed a reduction in losses, it undermines the claim that the new pesticide is more effective. Therefore, this option weakens the official's conclusion.

(D) Pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticide.

This option does not provide evidence against the conclusion because it involves pear trees that were not treated with any pesticide.

(E) Pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticide.

This option does not provide evidence against the conclusion because it involves pear trees treated with the new pesticide, which is claimed to be more effective.

Considering the options, (C) stands out as the one that presents a group of trees (pear trees treated with the old pesticide) that did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects. Therefore, (C) is the most strongly supported option that weakens the official's conclusion.

In summary, the answer is (C) because it presents evidence contradicting the official's conclusion, showing that the old pesticide was effective in limiting losses of fruit to insects for pear trees.

Answered by Talent Skill Learning · View profile

Attention GMAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the Passage carefully and answer the question as follow.The word Inference is used in two different senses, which are often confused but should be carefully distinguished. In the first sense, it means a process of thought or reasoning by which the mind passes from facts or statements presented, to some opinion or expectation. The data may be very vague and slight, prompting no more than a guess or surmise; as from the trick of a man’s face entertain some prejudice as to his character. Or the data may be important and strongly significant, like the footprint that frightened Crusoe into thinking of cannibals, or as when news of war makes the city expect that Consols will fall. These are examples of the act of inferring, or of inference as a process; and with inference in this sense Logic has nothing to do; it belongs to Psychology to explain how it is that our minds pass from one perception or thought to another thought, and how we come to conjecture, conclude and believe. In the second sense, ‘inference’ means not this process of guessing or opining, but the result of it; the surmise, opinion, or belief when formed; in a word, the conclusion: and it is in this sense that Inference is treated off in Logic. The subject-matter of Logic is an inference, judgment or conclusion concerning facts, embodied in a proposition, which is to be examined in relation to the evidence that may be adduced for it, in order to determine whether, or how far, the evidence amounts to proof.Logic is the science of Reasoning in the sense in which ‘reasoning’ means giving reasons, for it shows what sort of reasons are good. Whilst Psychology explains how the mind goes forward from data to conclusions, Logic takes a conclusion and goes back to the data, inquiring whether those data, together with any other evidence (facts or principles) that can be collected, are of a nature to warrant the conclusion. If we think that John Doe is of an amiable disposition, that water expands on freezing, or that one means to national prosperity is popular education, and wish to know whether we have evidence sufficient to justify us in holding these opinions, Logic can tell us what form the evidence should assume in order to be conclusive. But whatever facts constitute the evidence, they must, in order to prove the point, admit of being stated in conformity with certain principles or conditions; and of these principles or conditions Logic is the science. It deals, then, not with the subjective process of inferring, but with the objective grounds that justify or discredit the inference.Q. The passage states which of the following about Logic?

View answer

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the question as follow.Shortly after September 11, 2001, the United States began requesting additional financial information about persons of interest by subpoenaing records located at the SWIFT banking consortium. SWIFT, which routes trillions of dollars a day, faced an ethical dilemma: fight the subpoenas in order to protect member privacy and the groups reputation for the highest level of confidentiality, or, comply and provide information about thousands of financial communications in the hope that lives will be saved. SWIFT decided to comply in secret, but in late June 2006, four major U.S. newspapers disclosed SWIFTs compliance. This sparked a heated public debate over the ethics of SWIFTs decision to reveal ostensibly confidential financial communications.Analyzing the situation in hindsight, three ethical justifications existed for not complying with the Treasury Departments requests. First, SWIFT needed to uphold its long-standing values of confidentiality, non-disclosure, and institutional trust. The second ethical reason against SWIFTs involvement came with inadequate government oversight as the Treasury Department failed to construct necessary safeguards to ensure the privacy of the data. Third, international law must be upheld and one could argue quite strongly that the governments use of data breached some parts of international law.Although SWIFT executives undoubtedly considered the aforementioned reasons for rejecting the governments subpoena, three ethical justifications for complying existed. First, it could be argued that the program was legal because the United States government possesses the authority to subpoena records stored within its territory and SWIFT maintained many of its records in Virginia. Second, it is entirely possible that complying with the governments subpoena thwarted another catastrophic terrorist attack that would have cost lives and dollars. Third, cooperating with the government did not explicitly violate any SWIFT policies due to the presence of a valid subpoena. However, the extent of cooperation certainly surprised many financial institutions and sparked some outrage and debate within the financial community.While SWIFT had compelling arguments both for agreeing and refusing to cooperate with the U.S. government program, even in hindsight, it is impossible to judge with certitude the wisdom and ethics of SWIFTs decision to cooperate as we still lack answers to important questions such as: what information did the government want? What promises did the government make about data confidentially? What, if any, potentially impending threats did the government present to justify its need for data?Q.Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

View answer

Statistics from counties indicate that the proportion of population who consumer sixty percent of more of their calories from organic produce tend to live 6 years longer on average and suffer from fewer chronic diseases than those who primarily consumer GMO foods. Based on current studies, there has been no conclusive proof that consuming GMO foods does not cause chronic diseases. This lack of proof, however, does not imply that the conclusion drawn by proponents of organic farming that GMO foods have a significant negative effect on ones lifestyles is justified. Clearly, people who consume much more expensive organic foods also take care of their health in other ways such as exercising regularly and eating a healthy mix of fruits and vegetables, factors that enable them to have overall healthier lifestyles, few chronic diseases, and a longer lifespan.In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

View answer

Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the following Question.As urban landscapes continue to expand, the rise of vertical farming is becoming a crucial element in the quest for sustainable city living. Vertical farms, which grow crops in stacked layers within a controlled environment, offer a revolutionary approach to agriculture in urban settings. This innovative method of farming is not just about saving space; its about reimagining how we produce food in the face of growing environmental challenges.One of the key advantages of vertical farming is its minimal use of water and pesticides. Unlike traditional agriculture, which relies heavily on these resources, vertical farms use hydroponic systems that circulate water efficiently and eliminate the need for soil and large-scale pesticide use. This approach significantly reduces the environmental impact of farming.Another significant benefit is the reduction in food miles. Vertical farms can be established within urban areas, drastically cutting down the distance food travels from farm to consumer. This not only ensures fresher produce but also reduces transportation emissions, contributing to lower carbon footprints.However, vertical farming faces its own set of challenges. The initial setup and operational costs can be high, making it difficult for these farms to compete with traditional agriculture in terms of cost. Additionally, the energy requirements for maintaining controlled environments, such as lighting and temperature control, are substantial. Critics argue that unless renewable energy sources power these farms, they may not be as sustainable as they seem.Despite these challenges, the potential of vertical farming in reshaping urban agriculture remains immense. As technology advances, the efficiency of these farms is expected to improve, making them a vital component in the development of sustainable cities.Q.Which of the following concerns about vertical farming is mentioned in the passage?

View answer

A ten-year comparison between the countries of Arudia and Cazonia in terms of crop yields per acre revealed that when only planted acreae is compared, Cazonian yields are equal to 68 percent of Arudian yields. When total agricultural acreage (planted acreage plus fallow acreag e) is compared, however, Cazonia’s yield is 114 percent of Arudia’s yield. From the information above, which of the following can be most reliably inferred about Arudian and Cazonian agriculture during the ten-year period?

View answer

Top Courses for GMATView all

GMAT Focus Edition Mock Test Series 2024

Quantitative for GMAT

Crash Course for GMAT

Data Insights for GMAT

100 RCs for GMAT

Top Courses for GMAT

View all

The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The local agricultural official gave the fruit growers of the District 10 Farmers Cooperative a new pesticide that they applied for a period of three years to their pear orchards in place of the pesticide they had formerly applied. During those three years, the proportion of pears lost to insects was significantly less than it had been during the previous three-year period. On the basis of these results, the official concluded that the new pesticide was more effective than the old pesticide, at least in the short term, in limiting the loss of certain fruit to insects.The official’s conclusion is most strongly supported if which one of the following groups of trees did not show a reduction in losses of fruit to insects?a)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideb)peach trees grown in the district that were treated with the new pesticide in addition to the old pesticidec)pear trees grown in the district that were treated with the old pesticide instead of the new pesticided)pear trees grown in neighboring district that were treated with neither the old nor the new pesticidee)pear trees grown in a neighboring district that were treated with the new pesticide instead of the old pesticideCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.

Explore Courses for GMAT exam