Introduction:
In the field of philosophy, the inclusion of personal reflections and opinions in answers for the Philosophy Optional subject is a matter of debate. While some argue that personal reflections and opinions can enrich the depth and quality of the answer, others believe that it may deviate from the objective and logical nature of philosophical inquiry. In this response, we will explore both perspectives and provide a balanced view on whether or not personal reflections and opinions should be included in answers for Philosophy Optional.

Arguments in favor of including personal reflections and opinions:
1. Enhances subjectivity: Philosophy often deals with subjective questions and interpretations. Including personal reflections and opinions allows the candidate to express their unique perspective, demonstrating a deeper understanding of the subject matter.
2. Engages the examiner: Personal reflections and opinions can make the answer more engaging and interesting for the examiner, as it shows that the candidate has actively thought about the topic and has a genuine interest in it.
3. Illustrates critical thinking skills: Including personal reflections and opinions can demonstrate the candidate's ability to critically analyze philosophical arguments and theories. It showcases their capacity to evaluate different perspectives and arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.
4. Provides context and relevance: Personal reflections and opinions can provide real-life examples and experiences that help to contextualize abstract philosophical concepts, making them more relatable and understandable for the reader.

Arguments against including personal reflections and opinions:
1. Objective nature of philosophy: Philosophy aims to uncover universal truths through rational and logical analysis. Including personal reflections and opinions may introduce subjective biases and emotions, which can hinder the objective nature of philosophical inquiry.
2. Focus on arguments and theories: Philosophy Optional answers should primarily focus on presenting well-constructed arguments and theories. Including personal reflections and opinions may divert attention away from these core elements.
3. Examiner's perspective: Examiners may have their own biases and preferences, and including personal reflections and opinions could potentially lead to disagreements or subjective evaluations from the examiner's side.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the decision to include personal reflections and opinions in answers for Philosophy Optional should be made judiciously. While it can add depth, engagement, and context to the answers, candidates should be cautious not to let personal biases overshadow objective analysis. It is essential to strike a balance between personal reflections and the presentation of well-constructed arguments and theories, ultimately showcasing a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.