CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: Read the following passage and an... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.
"Did you continue firing?"
"Yes," replied the general.
There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the table's edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:
"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?"
"I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all."
"What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?"
"Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing."
"Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question.
"I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."
A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation.
"You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred."
"Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number."
"I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?"
"No, there was no volley shooting."
"The crowd was very dense?"
"It was very dense."
"It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?"
"No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."
[This is an extract from Stanley Wolpert's fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]
Q. Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the general's answer in the passage?
  • a)
    They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.
  • b)
    They were surprised by His Lordship's response to the general's answer.
  • c)
    They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.
  • d)
    The crowd was shocked by the general's affirmation of continued firing.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."D...
Reaction of the Audience
The audience's astonishment stemmed from the gravity of the general's admission regarding his actions during the Amritsar massacre.
Significance of the General's Admission
- The general confessed to continuing to fire upon a crowd, despite acknowledging that he could have dispersed them without resorting to violence.
- His statement highlighted a blatant disregard for human life, as he prioritized his own reputation over the safety of the civilians.
Shock and Disbelief
- The audience gasped in response to the general's affirmation of continued firing, indicating their shock at the callousness and justification of his actions.
- The general's reasoning—fearing the humiliation of not effectively dispersing the crowd—revealed a disturbing mindset that prioritized personal pride over ethical responsibility.
Context of the Inquiry
- The Committee of Inquiry was convened to investigate the massacre and the general's conduct was under scrutiny.
- The audience's reaction reflects a broader societal outrage at the brutality that occurred and the indifference displayed by those in authority.
Conclusion
- The astonishment in the room was not merely about the general's actions but also about the implications of such a mindset in a leader.
- The crowd’s shock underscores the moral outrage against the atrocities committed during the Amritsar massacre and the urgent need for accountability.
Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."D...
Option 4 is indeed the correct answer. The passage supports this choice as it mentions, "There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word." This single word, "yes," indicates that the audience was taken aback by the general's response to His Lordship's question about the continuation of firing.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.What can be inferred from the passage about the general regarding his decision to fire at the crowd?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.What is the meaning of the word incredulity as it is used in the passage?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Which of the following CANNOT be inferred from the passage?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Based on the information in the passage, why did the general think it was his responsibility to persist in firing?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the general opt for individual firing as opposed to volley firing?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question."Did you continue firing?""Yes," replied the general.There was an audible gasp that echoed through this crowded room in response to that single word. His Lordship waited for silence to be restored, sitting with eyes lowered, hands clasped tightly on the long table that separated the Committee from everyone else. The folds of his black robe pinched against the tables edge as he hunched forward, leaning heavily on his elbows, asking in a voice strained thin by incredulity:"If the crowd was going to disperse, why did you not stop firing?""I thought it my duty to go on firing until it dispersed. If I fired a little, the effect would not be sufficient. If I had fired a little I should be wrong in firing at all.""What reason had you to suppose that if you had ordered the assembly to leave the Bagh they would not have done so without the necessity of your firing, continued firing for a length of time?""Yes, I think it is quite possible that I could have dispersed them perhaps even without firing.""Why did you not adopt that course" His Lordship asked, shaking his head, more in wonder than horror, as he asked the question."I could not disperse them for some time," the General answered, speaking slowly, sounding distracted as he stared over the heads of the judges, "then they would all come back and laugh at me, and I considered I would be making myself a fool."A wave of startled comment greeted this remark, and the clamour became so loud that His Lordship was obliged to rap his gavel before continuing his interrogation."You know that the casualties were something between four hundred and five hundred.""Yes I have seen it in the papers. I divided all my rounds by five--" He paused and touched his fingertips to his lips, staring vacantly at the ceiling, mumbling, "I am in doubt whether by five or six--to arrive at the number.""I understood that the shooting that took place was individual shooting, and it was not volley shooting?""No, there was no volley shooting.""The crowd was very dense?""It was very dense.""It was unlikely that a man shooting into the crowd will miss?""No, according to the circumstances of the case," the General replied, shaking his head, sounding bewildered. "They were running, and I noticed only a certain number of men were hit. In the centre of the section, the crowd was very dense and therefore if a man directed his fire well he should not miss."[This is an extract from Stanley Wolperts fictionalised account entitled Massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, published by Penguin Books India, 1988. The extract is from a section entitled Lahore: November 19, 1919 and deals with the Committee of Inquiry into the Amritsar massacre which condemned the conduct of General Reginald Dyer.]Q.Why did the audience in the room react with astonishment when they heard the generals answer in the passage?a)They were angry that martial law was not proclaimed beforehand.b)They were surprised by His Lordships response to the generals answer.c)They were upset to watch His Lordship calmly question the general.d)The crowd was shocked by the generals affirmation of continued firing.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev