Question Description
Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Study the following information carefully answer the question given beside.India has come under fire at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) for avoiding questions raised by members on its MSP programmes for food grain, particularly rice, where subsidies have breached prescribed limits. Some countries have alleged that India did not give sufficient replies to concerns raised by them during consultations.Members such as the U.S., Australia, Canada, the EU, and Thailand, said at a WTO agriculture committee meeting on Monday, that India must reply to questions asked on its public stockholding (PSH) programmes at the committee, according to sources. “India, however, stuck to its guns and insisted that it provided the best possible information and clarifications at the consultations held with interested members based on available information.India’s MSP programmes are under scrutiny at the WTO, as it is the first country to invoke the Bali ‘peace clause’ to justify exceeding its 10% ceiling (of the total value of rice production) for rice support in 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. While the ‘peace clause’ allows developing countries to breach the 10% ceiling without invoking legal action by members, it is subject to onerous notification requirements and numerous conditions such as not distorting global trade and not affecting food security of other members.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “India comes under fire at WTO for avoiding questions on MSP subsidy”, The Hindu]Q.In the framework of the WTO Agreement On Agriculture (AoA), subsidies are classified into three categories: Green Box, Amber Box, and Blue Box. In which of these categories does the concept of Minimum Support Price fall?a)Green Boxb)Amber Boxc)Blue Boxd)All of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.