Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Supreme Court in a significant judgement said it is unconstitutional to distinguish between married and unmarried women for allowing termination of pregnancy on certain exceptional grounds when the foetus is between 20-24 weeks. The decision follows an interim order in July by which the court had allowed a 25-year-old woman to terminate her pregnancy. The ruling, incidentally delivered on International Safe Abortion Day, emphasises female autonomy in accessing abortion. The challenge to the provision was made in July by a 25-year-old unmarried woman who moved the court seeking an abortion after the Delhi High Court declined her plea. The womans case was that she wished to terminate her pregnancy as her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage. She also argued that the continuation of the pregnancy would involve a risk of grave and immense injury to her mental health. However, the law allowed such change in circumstances only for marital relationships. The Supreme Court, holding that the law had to be given a purposeful interpretation, had allowed the petitioner to terminate her pregnancy in an interim order. However, the larger challenge to the law, which would benefit other women as well, was kept pending.[Source - The Indian Express, September 30, 2022]Q. In which nation was the 1973 landmark decision of Roe v. Wade, concerning abortion, overturned?a)Australiab)The United Statesc)Chinad)The United KingdomCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.