CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: Read the following passage and an... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.
As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.
For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.
Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.
The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her father's or mother's brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.
[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]
Q. While he was away, a man's acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The woman's distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?
  • a)
    The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.
  • b)
    No, as the husband and his family were not involved.
  • c)
    The answer is yes, as the wife's acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.
  • d)
    Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per ...
Only the husband or any of his relatives are covered by this section. His companion is not covered by the scope of this clause.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.According to Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, when can the court presume that the suicide of a woman has been abetted by her husband or a relative of her husband?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Initially, Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code came under much flak as it didnt prescribe death penalty which was provided for in case of murder. There was a proposal to amend this section and provide stricter punishment for dowry deaths. The 202nd report of Law Commission presented in 2007 did not approve of the proposed amendment as prosecution under Section 304B is no bar to prosecution for murder. Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code states that if a woman dies within seven years of marriage by any burns or bodily injury or it was revealed that before her death she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative of the husband in connection to demand dowry, then the death of the woman will be considered a dowry death. Punishment for dowry death is a minimum sentence of imprisonment for seven years or a maximum sentence of imprisonment for life.To hold a person under this section, it is required that death should be caused by burns or bodily injury or by any other circumstances and it must occur within the seven years of marriage. Also, it must be revealed that soon before her marriage she was exposed to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any other relative and that it was so in connection with the demand for dowry.As per Section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, dowry is any property or valuable security directly or indirectly agreed to be given by one party to a marriage to the other party to the marriage or by the parent of either party to a marriage or by any other person, to either party to the marriage or to any other person, at or before or any time after the marriage in connection with the marriage of the said parties.Section 304B deals with both homicidal and suicidal deaths. These provisions show a marked departure from the ordinary principles of criminal law wherein its entirely upon the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. In cases of dowry death, the prosecution has to discharge the initial burden of ruling out the possibility of a natural death and adducing evidence of link between the death of the woman and cruelty related to dowry demand. Beyond this, the onus shifts onto the accused to prove his innocence.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Dowry Death under Section 304b of IPC & 113 B of Evidence Act, blog by Ipleaders]Q.What is the minimum punishment for a dowry death under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code?

The capital sentencing framework in India developed in Bachan Singh sought to guide the discretionary power of judges in choosing between life imprisonment and a death sentence. The resulting ‘rarest of rare’ framework mandates sentencing courts to weigh aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the offence and the offender, while also considering probability of reformation, and the suitability of the alternative option of life imprisonment. Contrary to the special emphasis on the role of mitigating circumstances of the offender in Bachan Singh, the report found that trial courts across the three states had little regard for it. Trial courts were heavily driven by a crime–centric approach and did not consider mitigating circumstances in 51% of the total cases.Closely tied to the non–consideration of mitigating circumstances by trial courts is the duration between conviction and sentencing hearing. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) under Section 235(2) provides for a bifurcated trial with separate conviction and sentencing hearings, to allow sufficient time to the defence lawyer to collect and present relevant mitigating evidence. However, the report found that in 44% of the cases, sentencing hearings took place on the same day as conviction. This also explains the dismal quality of sentencing arguments made by defence lawyers.Which of the following statements highlight(s) the problems with death penalty adjudication by courts, in the backdrop of the above passage? I. There is lack of clarity about sentencing factors. II. There are no constitutional thresholds in place for a sentencing hearing and no remedies for deficient sentencing hearings. III. Crime centric approach is the right approach and the courts must not look into mitigating factors."

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.As per Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine.For the purpose of this section, cruelty means any willful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman. Cruelty is harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, explains how the above provision is to be presumed. It explains that where the question is whether the commission of suicide by a woman had been abetted by her husband or any relative of her husband and it is shown that she had committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her marriage and that her husband or such relative of her husband had subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume, having regard to all the other circumstances of the case, that such suicide had been abetted by her husband or by such relative of her husband.The Code of Criminal Procedure provides that no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code except upon a police report of facts which constitute such offence or upon a complaint made by the person aggrieved by the offence or by her father, mother, brother, sister, or by her fathers or mothers brother or sister or with the leave of the court, by any other person related to her by blood, marriage or adoption.[Extracted with edits and revision, from Section 498A of IPC, blog by legalserviceindia]Q.While he was away, a mans acquaintance persuaded his wife that her spouse intended to divorce her. The womans distress over this revelation ultimately led to her death. Is the spouse accountable?a)The husband was unaware of this deed, hence the answer is no.b)No, as the husband and his family were not involved.c)The answer is yes, as the wifes acquaintance helped her carry out the crime.d)Yes, all of this was enough to demonstrate cruelty toward the wife.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev