Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Supreme Court has held in March 2023 Judgment that the day of remand is to be included for considering for considering a claim for default bail. An accused becomes entitled to default bail if the chargesheet isnt filed by 61st or if given extension by the court on 91st day of the remand, the 3 judge bench stated. Under Section 437(5)of CrPC, the court whichhas granted bail can cancel it, if found necessary undercertain conditions. As per section 439(2), the Sessions Court, High Court, or Supreme Court can, suo moto, cancel the bail granted to the accused and transfer the accused to custody. As per section 389(2),an appellate court can also cancel the bail of the accused and order the accused to be arrested and sent to custody.Generally during first violaton of a bail restriction, explanation is asked from the accused rather than direct cancellation of bail.In Re: Digendra Sarkar– Under Section 438 of the CrPC, the application for anticipatory bail applied even before the First Information Report is registered. So, First Information Report cannot be a condition precedent to applying for anticipatory bail. In Suresh Vasudeva vs. State– Section 438(1) applies only to non-bailable offences. Lastly in Sushila Agarwal vs. State– Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail should not be for a fixed period, but it is open to the court to limit the tenure of anticipatory bail if any special condition necessitates the same. In Gurbaksha Singh Sibbia and others vs. The State of Punjab– the Supreme Court opined that there are no provisions in the CrPC regarding time boundness of granting pre – arrest anticipatory bail. The concerned court has the discretion to impose conditions for grant of anticipatory bail including a limited period of protection etc., subject to considering any special circumstances required.Q.What does Section 437(5) of CrPC allow the court to do regarding bail?a)It allows the court to grant bail under any circumstances.b)It allows the court to extend the duration of bail without conditions.c)It allows the court to cancel bail under certain conditions.d)It allows the court to transfer the accused to another jurisdiction.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.