Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?a)The consideration of a membership application at the UNSC requires a five-year duration.b)Exclusive eligibility for permanent UNSC membership is reserved for developed nations.c)None of the current Permanent Five members expresses an interest in expanding the council presently.d)Interestingly, the possibility for expansion only arises during periods when India does not occupy the rotating seat.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.