CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: Read the following passage and an... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.
Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.
India's agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the century's new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where India's capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display India's abilities.
[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]
Q. Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the author's position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?
  • a)
    The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received. 
  • b)
    The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of India's budget at the expense of healthcare.
  • c)
    India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.
  • d)
    India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Wheneve...
The author contends that India has initiated some preliminary efforts in multilateral engagement but emphasizes the need for increased involvement in shaping international rules. Therefore, if India has called for the reform of the World Health Organization, it demonstrates the leadership qualities that the author recommends for India. Option 1 closely aligns with the author's argument.
Option 2 can be refuted based on the passage, which states that "New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda" and suggests that India should address contemporary challenges, implying that it's not merely about adhering to established agendas.
Option 3 introduces a negative aspect of maneuvering, which lacks support from the passage's content.
Option 4 lacks support as there is no discussion in the passage related to the consecutive holding of the rotating seat.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following best describes the passages major idea?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.What can be deduced from the passage?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following would align most with the authors perspective regarding the challenging nature of UNSC expansion?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which part of the arguments in the passage does the authors claim that "India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance" play?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Minilaterals enable like-minded countries to work together in areas that are hindered by multilaterals or bigger groups of nations. For example, minilateral groups are pursuing common goals toward practical climate targets, while it has proved difficult to reach agreement on climate issues in larger multilateral settings. In a significant development, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia announced a minilateral formation committed to bolstering mangrove conservation around the world during the U.N. climate summit in Egypt last November. Called the Mangrove Alliance for Climate, the group also includes India, Sri Lanka, Australia, Japan, and Spain. Meanwhile, the United States is also expanding its involvement in minilateralism, making it a critical tool for economic diplomacy. The Chip 4 alliance brings together the United States, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea to create a supply-chain grouping of leading chipmakers. Although the initiative is based on economic concerns, it also has an underlying geopolitical element: Its aim is to counter China’s dominance in designing and producing sophisticated semiconductors. U.S. involvement in minilaterals may be motivated by geopolitical considerations, but the format also allows countries that don’t wish to focus on geopolitical competition to work with the United States on issues of mutual concern.The changing geostrategic landscape has created new opportunities for cooperation among several middle powers. Minilateralism can provide a model for emerging markets and developing countries, too. Although its benefits seem to far outweigh its costs, it does come with some risks; minilateralism could make international organizations more ineffective than they already are and could promote contention. But in many cases, bilateral relations have reached a saturation point, and multilateral institutions are weak and ineffective. With or without the United States, minilateralism is likely to thrive in the years to come, much as nonalignment gained traction during the Cold War.[Extracted with edits and revision from “Minilateral Era” by Husaln Haqqanl and Narayannapa Janardhan, ForeignPolicy]Q.Which of the following claims does the author agree with without hesitation?

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Whenever India takes a seat at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), there is excitement about the possibility of it translating into permanent membership. When holding one of the rotating seats, it is a sensible ambition to make the case, through diplomatic accomplishments, for being a permanent member. But expanding SC is a tortuous process. At present, the window of opportunity for SC reform is closed. After a year of battling with nature, much of the world sees multilateral responses to climate and health as the heart of UN reform.Indias agenda sensibly focuses on what is optically useful and realistically possible. New Delhi has a traditional multilateral agenda, which revolves around counterterrorism, peacekeeping, trade, and, negatively, opposition to an intrusive human rights regime. Much of this remains relevant, but the coming years should allow India to take up new issues. Climate, public health, maritime security and digital standards stand out among the centurys new challenges. Much of this is on the fringes of the UN, but there will be considerable spillover. Global climate cooperation still uses the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change as its foundational understanding. India has made nascent multilateral contributions in this space, such as the International Solar Alliance, but needs to become more involved in rules-setting. Maritime security is increasingly intertwined with the need to uphold the UN Law of the Sea against the revanchist tendencies of China. Global trade will increasingly be about data, a domain where Indias capabilities and policies will win points with other developing countries. Multilateralism is the most difficult form of diplomacy, and SC membership, even if non-permanent, is among the best platforms to display Indias abilities.[Extracted with edits and reviews, from Editorials, Hindustan Times]Q.Which of the following statements, if accurate, would support the authors position on the strategy India should adopt to obtain a permanent seat on the Security Council?a)The World Health Organization reform call from New Delhi was well received.b)The fight against terrorism takes up a large chunk of Indias budget at the expense of healthcare.c)India has been able to manipulate its allies into giving it the upper hand over China in world commerce.d)India has been successful in keeping its rotating seat at the SC for three years in a row.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev