LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justi...

Join the Discussion on the App

LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general 'duty to act fairly'.

FACTUAL SITUATION: 'X', a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by 'Y', a female employee of the company that 'X' was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen. Is the dismissal of X valid?

a)
No, because the employer did not give a chance to 'X' to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.
b)
Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.
c)
Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.
d)
No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Nature and Meaning of Law- 1

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and fo...

Principles of natural justice constitute one of the most important concepts of Administrative law. The expression 'natural justice' has been interpreted to cover several rules of equity and fair play and is sometimes also referred to as 'substantial justice', 'fundamental justice', 'Universal justice' and 'fair play in action'. The underlying object of natural justice is not only to secure justice, but also to prevent miscarriage of justice, thus ensuring that fundamental liberties and rights of citizens are well protected.
Two basic pillars of principles of natural justice
1. Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa: no man can be a judge in his own cause
2. Audi alteram partem: A person cannot be condemned without being heard
Considering the above given situation the dismissal of X is against the principles of natural justice, considering the second basic pillar of natural justice i.e. Audi alteram partem

Answered by Crafty Classes · View profile

Attention Humanities/Arts Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Humanities/Arts study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Humanities/Arts.

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?

View answer

Consists of legal proposition(s) principle(s) (herein after referred to as principl e) and facts. Such principle may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles those are given herein below for every question.Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to testy your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability, even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.Therefore, to answer a question, principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option.Principle: A violation of a legal right of someone, whether results in a legal injury or not, gives rise to an action in tort for compensation. At the same time, an action by someone, which results in some loss or damage to somebody else is not actionable, if there is no violation of a right of that somebody.Facts: AB Coaching Centre was a popular CLAT coaching academy with several good trainers. A lot of aspirants used to attend its coaching classes from all over and was making good profit. This was going on for the past several years. During a session, T, one of the very good and popular trainer of ABCC, has some difference of opinion with the owner of ABCC and left the coaching centre. In August 20162016, T started another Entrance Coaching Centre closer to ABCC which resulted in a substantial drop in its students and huge financial loss. The owner of ABCCABCC wants to file a case against T for the loss sustained by ABCC. What do you think is the right legal position?

View answer

This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as principles) and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the "most reasonable conclusion" arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.Principle: Mere silence as unfairly, hurts B, A commits no offence decision of a person to enter into a contract does not amount of fraud, unless his silence is in itself equivalent to speech.Facts: A sells to B a horse which A knows to be of unsound mind. B says to A that if A does not say anything about the state of mind of horse, then B shells presume that the horse is of sound mind. A says nothing to B about the mental condition of horse.

View answer

Principle One of the principles of natural justice is Nemo judex in causa sua, which means that no one should be a judge in his own cause. In other words, no person can judge a case in which he has an interest.Facts X, a member of the selection board for a government service, was also a candidate for selection for the same service. X did not take part in the deliberations of the board when his name was considered and approved.

View answer

Direction: Read the case study given below and answer the questions that follow:International trade is the result of specialisation in production. It benefits the world economy if different countries practise specialisation and division of labour in the production of commodities or provision of services. Each kind of specialisation can give rise to trade. Thus, international trade is based on the principle of comparative advantage, complementarity and transferability of goods and services and in principle, should be mutually beneficial to the trading partners. In modern times, trade is the basis of the world’s economic organisation and is related to the foreign policy of nations. With well-developed transportation and communication systems, no country is willing to forego the benefits derived from participation in international trade.On what principles is international trade based?

View answer

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

Geography Class 11

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

View all

LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice LEGAL PRINCIPLE: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it has largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.FACTUAL SITUATION: X, a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.b)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and not violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.c)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law.d)No, because in the modern times this type of behaviour is common.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam