Humanities/Arts Exam  >  Humanities/Arts Questions  >  Principle: The concept of natural justice is ... Start Learning for Free
Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly'.
Fact: 'X' a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by 'Y', a female employee of the company that 'X' was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of 'X' valid?
  • a)
    No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.
  • b)
    Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of law
  • c)
    Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.
  • d)
    No, because the employer did not give a chance to 'X' to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the ...
No, because the employer did not give a chance to 'X' to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.
Natural justice mandates that X should have been given a fair chance to explain his side before a decision was taken and was dismissed by his employer. There was no 'duty to act fairly' and the principle of natural justice has been violated.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Consists of legal proposition(s) principle(s) (herein after referred to as principl e) and facts. Such principle may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles those are given herein below for every question.Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to testy your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability, even if the most reasonable conclusion arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.Therefore, to answer a question, principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option.Principle: A violation of a legal right of someone, whether results in a legal injury or not, gives rise to an action in tort for compensation. At the same time, an action by someone, which results in some loss or damage to somebody else is not actionable, if there is no violation of a right of that somebody.Facts: AB Coaching Centre was a popular CLAT coaching academy with several good trainers. A lot of aspirants used to attend its coaching classes from all over and was making good profit. This was going on for the past several years. During a session, T, one of the very good and popular trainer of ABCC, has some difference of opinion with the owner of ABCC and left the coaching centre. In August 20162016, T started another Entrance Coaching Centre closer to ABCC which resulted in a substantial drop in its students and huge financial loss. The owner of ABCCABCC wants to file a case against T for the loss sustained by ABCC. What do you think is the right legal position?

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: The concept of natural justice is against bias and for the right to a fair hearing. While the term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, and it had largely been replaced and extended by the general duty to act fairly.Fact: X a male employee of a company was dismissed by the employer just on the basis of a complaint by Y, a female employee of the company that X was trying to be too friendly with her and often requested her to accompany him to the canteen.Is the dismissal of X valid?a)No, because in the modern times this type of behavior is common.b)Yes, because men are not supposed to behave improperly with women and hence there is no violation of any principles of lawc)Yes, moral law is antique and therefore, not applicable in modern times, therefore the termination is valid and no violations of the principles of natural justice occurred.d)No, because the employer did not give a chance to X to explain his side, thereby violated the principles of natural justice.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev