All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Direction: Read the following passage careful... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:
The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to  provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.
Public Services include:
  • Transport service.
  • Postal, telegraph or telephone services.
  • Supply of power, light and water to public.
  • System of public conservancy or sanitation.
  • Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.
Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of:
  • any case pending before; or
  • any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.
The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.
The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.
Q. Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?
  • a)
    Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.
  • b)
    Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.
  • c)
    File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.
  • d)
    None of the above.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
According to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, the award issued by the Lok Adalat, outlining the terms of the compromise, holds the same legal force as a court decree. This means that it can be executed in the same way as a civil court decree. Therefore, Mr. Ramesh can approach the Lok Adalat once more to enforce the settlement agreement that was originally reached. The Lok Adalat possesses the authority to summon witnesses, enforce document production, receive evidence through affidavits, and is considered a civil court for the purposes of Section 195 and Chapter XXVI of the Criminal Procedure Code. Consequently, Mr. Ramesh can submit an application to the Lok Adalat to enforce the settlement agreement. Should Mr. Gupta persist in his refusal to comply, appropriate legal actions can be taken.
Hence, option B is the correct choice.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Which of the following services is NOT listed as a part of Public Utility Services in the passage?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.What is the main objective of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, as mentioned in the passage?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. What is the correct meaning of the word ‘infringement’?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.What is the correct meaning of the word ‘infringement’?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. What is the tone of the author?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The advent of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 gave a statutory status to Lok Adalats, pursuant to the constitutional mandate in Article 39-A of the Constitution of India. It contains various provisions for settlement of disputes through Lok Adalat. This Act mandates constitution of legal services authorities to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society and to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities. It also mandates organization of Lok Adalats to secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice on the basis of equal opportunity. When statutory recognition had been given to Lok Adalat, it was specifically provided that the award passed by the Lok Adalat formulating the terms of compromise will have the force of decree of a court, which can be executed as a civil court decree. In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.Public Services include: Transport service. Postal, telegraph or telephone services. Supply of power, light and water to public. System of public conservancy or sanitation. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments.Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalats. A Lok Adalat shall have jurisdiction to determine and to arrive at a compromise or settlement between the parties to a dispute in respect of: any case pending before; or any matter which is falling within the jurisdiction of, and is not brought before, any court for which the Lok Adalat is organized.The Lok Adalat can compromise and settle even criminal cases, which are compoundable under the relevant laws. There is no appeal against any decision made by Lok Adalat.The Lok Adalat shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit, in respect of the following matters: Power to summon and enforce the attendance of any witness and to examine him/her on oath. Power to enforce the discovery and production of any document. Power to receive evidence on affidavits, Power for requisitioning of any public record or document or copy thereof or from any court. Such other matters as may be prescribed. Every Lok Adalat shall have the power to specify its own procedure for the determination of any dispute coming before it. All proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of Sections 193, 219 and 228 of IPC. Every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of Sec 195 and Chapter XXVI of Cr.P.C.Q.Mr. Ramesh became embroiled in a land dispute with his neighbor, Mr. Gupta. Despite multiple hearings in the District Court, no resolution was achieved. Ultimately, the District Court referred the case to the Lok Adalat. After several rounds of mediation, the Lok Adalat successfully reached a settlement that both parties agreed to. However, Mr. Gupta later reneged on the settlement agreement, resulting in a new dispute. In this situation, what legal recourse is available to Mr. Ramesh?a)Initiate a new case in the District Court against Mr. Gupta.b)Revisit the Lok Adalat to enforce the previously agreed-upon settlement.c)File a criminal case against Mr. Gupta for breach of contract.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup