Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.It has taken no less than the highest court of the land to reiterate the fact that the value of a womans work at home is no less than that of her office-going husband. The Supreme Courts wisdom, ironically, has also laid bare an unsavoury reality: that remuneration for domestic work performed by women remains unrecognized and, hence, unrewarded. The implications of this entrenched discrimination are appalling. Research shows that Indian women do the most unpaid care and domestic work out of any country globally, with the exception of Kazakhstan. According to data from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men.There can be no argument against recognizing that womens domestic labour deserves compensation. Yet, even in a hypothetical situation where domestic work is monetized, this kind of affirmative intervention could create a new set of challenges. Households headed by men, be it the husband or the father-in-law, are likely to view the woman as a paid employee, deepening the sense of entitlement that Indian men harbour towards women and their labour. Remuneration for household work could put men off even further from sharing domestic responsibilities since, according to their distorted perspective, women are now entitled to receive payment. Most important, this might lead to the creation of a culture where women choose or are coerced to shun employment outside the home. While the idea of compensating housework is noble, it must be accompanied by simultaneous emancipatory policies in relevant spheres. These must include the consolidation of womens right to inherit property and reside in their marital homes safely as well as demand equal participation from their partners in parenting responsibilities. None of these issues can be viewed in isolation from the matter of recognizing the value of womens labour at home.[Extracted with edits and revisions from The Editorial Board, The Telegraph India]Q.What role does the statement - women in India spend 577 per cent more time in a day on invisible household work than men - play in the arguments presented in the passage?a)It is a conclusion drawn by the author based on the findings of a research report.b)It forms the basis for the authors argument that women should be remunerated for their domestic labor.c)It reinforces the authors argument that men have a distorted view of compensation for household chores.d)It supports the authors statement that Indian women receive lower pay than their husbands.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.