Question Description
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question given beside.Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant picks up the thrown gauntlet and enters into a compromise and agrees to have the charges dropped against the accused. However, the cardinal caveat is that such a compromise ought to be visited with "bonafides" and cannot stem out of illegal benefits to which the complainant is not entitled to. The Code vide Section 320 contemplates compounding of certain offences enumerated in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC"). Compounding of offences has legislatively been bifurcated in two broad categories i.e. compounding of offences without the permission of the Court and compounding of offences with the permission of the Court. The offences that dispense with the blessings of the Court or do not require court of law are of comparatively diminished magnitude such as offences under Sections 298,491,500,501 etc. of the IPC. The offences that require the strike of the gavel i.e court of law are offences such as Sections 325,406,420,494 etc. of the IPC. For example Grievous hurt cases require Compounding to be done by Court of Law. Where the accused is made a party to the proceedings of compounding an offence in which the accused resides outside the jurisdiction of the Court, there is statutorily no requirement for him to incur expenses to come and appear in the compounding proceedings. The common practice of featuring the accused in the memo of parties is a dispensable step which when dispensed with not only would expedite the Court proceedings but would also be in consonance with the intention of the legislature. The effect of compounding of an offence is fundamentally a withdrawal of the charges pressed against the accused. Let us extend this analogy further, all other proceedings such as withdrawal of a suit, withdrawal of a Special Leave Petition, withdrawal of an application, do not contemplate the other party being made part of the withdrawal proceedings and the withdrawal is proceeded with simplicitor. The said practice is not only unnecessary given that the statutory scheme but is also an inconvenience to the accused who in manner of speaking "has paid all his debts". Extracted from Compounding Of Offences: Is The Accused Invited To The "Party" - Crime - India (mondaq.com).Q.What is the standard procedure followed by Indian courts with relation to withdrawal actions in SLP matters under Indian law?a)There is participation from both parties.b)Involvement is limited to the court and the petitioner.c)All three parties, the court, the petitioner, and the defendant, are engaged.d)Solely the court is engaged.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.