Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (andldquo;CIC/SICandrdquo;) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Read the following passage careful...

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:

Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO:

Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application.
Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application.
Malafidely denied the RTI request.
Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information.
Destroyed the requested information.
Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.

Amount of penalty:

The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.

Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?

a)
The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.
b)
The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.
c)
The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.
d)
The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...

According to the passage, a personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, such as when the CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request. Other conditions mentioned in the options (A and C) are not explicitly mentioned in the passage as grounds for imposing a penalty.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...

Conditions for Imposing Penalty under RTI Act
The Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) can impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) only under specific conditions as outlined in the RTI Act. Here’s a detailed explanation:
Key Conditions for Penalty
- Malafide Denial: The CPIO must have malafidely denied the RTI request. This indicates an intention to obstruct or deny access to information unjustly.
- Failure to Provide Information: The CPIO must fail to provide information within the stipulated 30 days from the receipt of the RTI application without reasonable cause.
- Refusal to Receive Application: If the CPIO refuses to receive the RTI application without reasonable cause, a penalty can be imposed.
- Misleading Information: Providing knowingly incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information can trigger a penalty.
- Destruction of Information: If the CPIO destroys the information that has been requested, this is grounds for penalty.
- Obstruction: Any actions that obstruct the furnishing of information can also lead to penalties.
Clarification on Incorrect Options
- Option A (Failure to provide within 15 days): This is incorrect as the RTI Act specifies a 30-day period.
- Option C (Incomplete information with reasonable cause): If the CPIO has a reasonable cause for providing incomplete information, then a penalty cannot be imposed.
- Option D (Penalty for any reason): This is misleading; penalties can only be imposed for specific malafide actions as stated above.
In summary, the correct answer is option 'B' as it aligns with the conditions specified for imposing penalties under the RTI Act, focusing on malafide conduct by the CPIO.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. Ram is a citizen of India who filed an RTI application with the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) seeking information related to a government project. The CPIO, without reasonable cause, refused to receive Rams RTI application. Ram approached the Central Information Commission (CIC), which issued a showcause notice to the CPIO asking for an explanation for not receiving the application. However, the CPIO failed to provide any satisfactory response. The CIC imposed a penalty of INR 20,000 on the CPIO for not receiving Rams RTI application. Is the imposition of the penalty by the CIC valid in this case?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below: Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner. Amount of penalty: The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO. Q. According to the Delhi High Court, under what circumstances can the CIC impose a penalty on the CPIO under the RTI Act?

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. Mr. Sharma submitted a request under the RTI Act to the Ministry of Environment and Forests, inquiring about the instances of industrial units violating environmental regulations and the subsequent measures taken against them. Nevertheless, the Ministrys Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) declined to provide the information, citing concerns about potential confidentiality breaches related to these industrial units. In response to this denial, Mr. Sharma filed a complaint with the Central Information Commission (CIC), asserting that the CPIO had acted with malintent in denying him access to the requested information.

View answer

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What is the responsibility of the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) when a penalty is imposed on them under the RTI Act?

View answer

The Supreme Court ruled in CPIO, SC vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal that the office of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) is a public authority under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The outcome is that the office of the CJI will now entertain RTI applications. Under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act, information means “any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force”. While ruling that the office of the CJI is a public authority, the Supreme Court held that RTI cannot be used as a tool of surveillance and that judicial independence has to be kept in mind while dealing with transparency.Whether a public authority discloses the information sought or not, however, is a different matter. Offices such as those of the Prime Minister and the President too are public authorities under the RTI Act. But public authorities have often denied information quoting separate observations by the Supreme Court itself in 2011: “Officials need to furnish only such information which already exists and is held by the public authority and not collate or create information”; and, “the nation does not want a scenario where 75% of the staff of public authorities spends 75% of their time in collecting and furnishing information to applicants instead of discharging their regular duties”.On December 16, 2015 (RBI vs Jayantilal N Mistry and Others), the Supreme Court noted: “It had long since come to our attention that the Public Information Officers under the guise of one of the exceptions given under Section 8 of RTI Act, have evaded the general public from getting their hands on the rightful information that they are entitled to.”Q.Ashok is an advocate, he filed an RTI application before the Chief Information Office of SC for providing him with the number of appeals filed by Central Govt. before the SC. Can his application be allowed?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:Under the RTI Act, the Central/State Information Commission (“CIC/SIC”) has the power to impose personal penalty[1] on the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), in case, the CPIO: Without reasonable cause refused to receive the RTI application. Failed to provide information within 30 days of the receipt of the RTI Application. Malafidely denied the RTI request. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete or misleading information. Destroyed the requested information. Obstructed furnishing of information in any manner.Amount of penalty:The CIC/SIC has the power to impose a penalty of INR 250 each day till the RTI application is received or information is furnished by the CPIO. The total amount of such a penalty however, is not to exceed INR 25,000. Supreme Court has held that the CIC/SIC can impose a penalty only for the purpose of ensuring that the correct information is furnished to a person seeking information from a public authority[2]. Delhi High Court has held that, it can happen that the CPIO may genuinely and bonafidely entertain the belief and hold the view that the information sought by the querist cannot be provided for one or the other reasons. Merely because the CIC eventually finds that the view taken by the CPIO was not correct, it cannot automatically lead to issuance of a showcause notice under Section 20 of the RTI Act and the imposition of penalty. Only in cases of malafides or unreasonable conduct, i.e., where the CPIO, without reasonable cause refuses to receive the application, or provide the information, or knowingly gives incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroys the information, that the personal penalty can be imposed on the CPIO. The division bench of Allahabad High Court has held that for imposing penalty, an opinion has to be formed that the CPIO without any reasonable cause has not furnished the information within the time specified. The formation of the opinion has to be on the basis of objective consideration/relevant material and should also disclose the materials on the basis of which it is formulated. The RTI Act requires that a reasonable opportunity of being heard is to be provided to the CPIO. The CPIO is therefore showcaused by CIC before any decision to impose penalty on him is taken. The RTI Act provides that the burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently shall be on the CPIO.Q. What conditions must be met for the Central/State Information Commission (CIC/SIC) to impose a personal penalty on a Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) under the RTI Act?a)The CPIO fails to provide information within 15 days of receiving the RTI application.b)The CPIO malafidely denies the RTI request.c)The CPIO provides incomplete information but has a reasonable cause for doing so.d)The CIC/SIC can impose a penalty for any reason.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam