CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Read the following passage careful...
Start Learning for Free
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:
The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.
Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.
Q. According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of India's sovereign green bond?
- a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.
- b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.
- c)Strong regulatory support.
- d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
The passage mentions that the successful issuance of India's sovereign green bond faced challenges due to "sluggish global growth" and "rising global interest rates." These factors created suboptimal conditions for international investors to invest in a local currency denominated offering, making it more challenging to attract investors.
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
Challenges to India's Sovereign Green Bond Success
The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond was marked by several factors that posed challenges to its success. Among the options presented in the question, the correct answer is option A: Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.
Key Challenges Explained
- Sluggish Global Growth:
The global economy was experiencing slow growth, which generally dampens investor confidence and appetite for new investments. This sluggishness can lead to a cautious approach from international investors, making them hesitant to participate in new bond issues, especially those in emerging markets.
- Rising Global Interest Rates:
Higher interest rates globally increase the cost of borrowing and make existing bonds with lower yields less attractive compared to new bonds with higher yields. This environment can also lead investors to seek safer, more stable investments, further complicating the appeal of new sovereign bonds, particularly in local currencies.
Other Options Considered
- Lack of Domestic Green Bond Issuance:
While the absence of a robust domestic ESG-aligned investor base raised skepticism, it was not a primary challenge to the issuance itself, as the bond was still heavily oversubscribed.
- Strong Regulatory Support:
Regulatory support is generally seen as a positive factor that aids the success of bond issuances rather than a challenge.
- Unclear Expenditure Categories in the Bond Framework:
While transparency is essential, the passage indicates that the allocations largely adhered to green categories, suggesting that this was managed effectively.
In conclusion, the main challenges that impacted the success of India's sovereign green bond were primarily external factors, notably sluggish global growth and rising interest rates, which created a suboptimal environment for international investment.
The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond was marked by several factors that posed challenges to its success. Among the options presented in the question, the correct answer is option A: Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.
Key Challenges Explained
- Sluggish Global Growth:
The global economy was experiencing slow growth, which generally dampens investor confidence and appetite for new investments. This sluggishness can lead to a cautious approach from international investors, making them hesitant to participate in new bond issues, especially those in emerging markets.
- Rising Global Interest Rates:
Higher interest rates globally increase the cost of borrowing and make existing bonds with lower yields less attractive compared to new bonds with higher yields. This environment can also lead investors to seek safer, more stable investments, further complicating the appeal of new sovereign bonds, particularly in local currencies.
Other Options Considered
- Lack of Domestic Green Bond Issuance:
While the absence of a robust domestic ESG-aligned investor base raised skepticism, it was not a primary challenge to the issuance itself, as the bond was still heavily oversubscribed.
- Strong Regulatory Support:
Regulatory support is generally seen as a positive factor that aids the success of bond issuances rather than a challenge.
- Unclear Expenditure Categories in the Bond Framework:
While transparency is essential, the passage indicates that the allocations largely adhered to green categories, suggesting that this was managed effectively.
In conclusion, the main challenges that impacted the success of India's sovereign green bond were primarily external factors, notably sluggish global growth and rising interest rates, which created a suboptimal environment for international investment.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?a)Sluggish global growth and rising global interest rates.b)Lack of domestic green bond issuance.c)Strong regulatory support.d)Unclear expenditure categories in the bond framework.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup