CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Direction: Read the following passage careful... Start Learning for Free
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:
The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.
Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.
Q. According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?
  • a)
    Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.
  • b)
    Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.
  • c)
    Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.
  • d)
    Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
The passage emphasizes the importance of transparency in the use of green bond resources. Transparency is significant because it helps build investor confidence. When investors can see that the funds raised through green bonds are being used for credible and sustainable projects, they are more likely to invest in these bonds. Transparency ensures that the funds are deployed for their intended purpose, which is promoting sustainability.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
Significance of Transparency in Green Bonds
Transparency plays a crucial role in the success of green bonds by building investor confidence and ensuring that funds are allocated to credible sustainable projects. Here’s a detailed breakdown of its significance:
Investor Confidence
- Transparency allows investors to understand how their money is being utilized.
- Clear information on project selection and fund allocation helps mitigate risks associated with greenwashing, wherein funds are misused or not directed towards genuinely sustainable initiatives.
Ensuring Proper Use of Funds
- By detailing the specific projects and expenditures financed by green bonds, transparency ensures accountability.
- Investors are more likely to invest in bonds when they can track the impact of their investments on sustainability goals.
Encouragement of Future Investments
- Demonstrating integrity in fund usage can encourage more investors to participate in green bond offerings.
- Success in initial offerings can lead to a virtuous cycle where increased investor interest spurs further issuance of green bonds.
Regulatory Support and Best Practices
- Transparency aligns with best practices and regulatory requirements, fostering a robust green finance ecosystem.
- It can also lead to better incentive structures, encouraging more projects to adhere to sustainable practices.
In summary, transparency is not merely a procedural requirement; it is a foundational element that enhances the credibility of green bonds, fosters investor trust, and ultimately drives the success of sustainable finance initiatives.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governanc e) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.What was the significant outcome of Indias sovereign green bond debut mentioned in the passage?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governanc e) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.What suggestion is given in the passage to further enhance the success of sovereign green bonds in emerging economies?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governanc e) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.What is the suggested role of Indias G20 Presidency in relation to sovereign green bonds, as mentioned in the passage?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governanc e) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what factors posed challenges to the success of Indias sovereign green bond?

Top Courses for CLAT

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:The successful debut of India’s sovereign green bond is a landmark event for its emerging sustainable finance ecosystem. Issued in two tranches of $1 billion each, the rupee denominated onshore debut was heavily oversubscribed at a six-basis point lower yield than the average India sovereign bond in the first round, and four basis points lower in the second round. This unexpected “greenium” marks an encouraging benchmark for future sustainable sovereign and corporate debt. The greenium’s positive signalling effect is substantial. It was secured against two major odds: The headwinds due to sluggish global growth, rising global interest rates and downward pressure on the rupee, which offered suboptimal conditions for international investors to buy into a local currency denominated offering. Second, the near absence of a domestic ESG (Environmental, social and governance) aligned investor base had raised scepticism about local investor appetite. The result shows that the market readiness for the green label exists and can be propelled with supportive regulatory/policy action. The greenium could become more sizeable with larger volumes of local currency sovereign green issuances both in onshore and offshore markets. The strategic co-benefits of sovereign issuance are bigger than the gains made on an individual issuance. According to a BIS paper, “After (the inaugural) issue, the annual number of corporate issues tends to increase across jurisdictions.” This happens due to demonstration effects. A 2021 sovereign issuers’ survey carried out by the Climate Bonds Initiative, reported that diversification of the investor pool and creation of a local green bond market are major motivators for most sovereign issuers. This was not a stated aim of the Indian authorities, but the regulatory support extended to investors will help do just that and will pave the way for better incentive structures.Transparency on the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects is vital. Budget 2023 carries the list of projects and expenditures which will be financed by the sovereign green borrowing. The Centre’s Green Finance Working Committee has done well to largely stick to the dark green categories of expenditures, in terms of volume, within those marked as ‘medium to dark green’ in the second party opinion (SPO) it received on its Green Bond framework. The allocations to MNRE (KUSUM, solar and wind power (grid scale), the National Green Hydrogen Mission), and the Ministry of Railways (three metro project lines and energy efficient electric locomotives) clearly fall in this category. The MoEFCC (National Afforestation Programme) allocation comes under the light green category in the SPO, implying that its long-term effects on climate mitigation or resilience are unclear. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs allocation for equity investment in metro projects stands out. Investors care for integrity and adhering to the best norms on evaluation and selection of projects is important. To build on the success of the sovereign green bond in India’s G20 Presidency, here are two suggestions: Foster a programme to grow local currency sovereign green issuances by emerging economies to avoid external debt traps and generate a larger pipeline of sustainable projects for national and global capital markets. Define and label sustainable activities through interoperable frameworks/taxonomies to guide capital flows. Definitions that can work seamlessly for global and local investors will help identify credible project pipelines and expenditures.Q.According to the passage, what is the significance of transparency regarding the use of green bond resources for credible sustainable projects?a)Transparency is not important for the success of green bonds.b)Transparency helps build investor confidence and ensures funds are used for sustainable projects.c)Transparency can lead to a higher "greenium" for the bonds.d)Transparency primarily benefits domestic investors.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev