There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > There have been dozens of high-profile mass ...

Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?

a)
If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.
b)
Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.
c)
The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.
d)
With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Forest Conservation Act of 1980, which the new Bill aims to amend, admittedly and justifiably adopted a rather protectionist stance which made forest clearances time-consuming and costly to obtain. While current development needs and priorities must be recognized, this Bill deviates in a significant manner from the spirit of the original law. Three points that emerge from the Bill have caused considerable consternation among environmental experts: the narrowed definition of forests under its scope; the exclusion of significant tracts of forest areas; and the granting of sanction to additional activities that were regulated earlier. These need to be better explained.The Bill will significantly restrict the application of the landmark Godavarman judgment of 1996 which had extended the scope of the 1980 Act to the dictionary meaning of ‘forest’ — that is, areas with trees rather than just areas legally notified as forest. The present Amendment restricts the Forest Conservation Act to only legally notified forests and forests recorded in government records on or after October 25, 1980. This change could potentially impact around 28% of India’s forest cover, encompassing almost 2,00,000 square kilometres. While these forests include fruit orchards and plantations, they also encompass forests of exceptional quality and conservation value. An instance is a category of Unclassed Forests in Nagaland, that have so far not been officially recorded or deemed forests despite centuries of protection and use by autonomous clans. Perversely, States that have refused to identify important forest areas despite the Godavarman judgment, may now be free to allow the destruction of these forests for construction and development. For the same reason, large swathes of the Aravalli Hills in the Delhi National Capital Region which are considered ecologically significant, apart from being critical to the water security of this region, may be affected by the amendment. Second, the Bill excludes some of India’s most fragile ecosystems as it removes the need for forest clearances for security related infrastructure up to 100 km of the international borders. These include globally recognized biodiversity hotspots such as the forests of northeastern India and high-altitude Himalayan forests and meadows. Third, the Bill introduces exemptions for construction projects such as zoos, safari parks, and ecotourism facilities. Artificially created green areas and animal enclosures are very different from natural ecosystems which provide a bouquet of ecosystem services that contribute significantly to human wellbeing. What is worrying is that the Bill also grants unrestricted powers to the Union government to specify ‘any desired use’ beyond those specified in the original or amended Act. Such provisions raise legitimate concerns about the potential exploitation of forest resources without adequate environmental scrutiny.Q.What is the central concern expressed in the passage regarding the Bills granting of "unrestricted powers" to the Union government?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The term state, under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, 1950, specifies that all the authorities which are functioning within or outside the territory of India will be considered to be the state under Part III of the Constitution. This definition is not exhaustive but inclusive. The authorities which are included in Article 12 are: The government and Parliament of India, the state government and the legislature of each state, all local authorities (municipalities, District Boards, Panchayats, Improvement Trust, Mining Settlement Boards, etc.) and other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.Apart from the central, state and local authorities, the authority or institutions which exercise governmental or sovereign powers or functions can be counted under other authorities.Article 13 of the Constitution speaks about laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights. This Article states that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void and that the state shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void. In this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, law includes any ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usages having in the territory of India the force of law; laws in force include laws passed or made by legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas. Last but not the least nothing in this Article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.Unlike the other legal rights which are created by the state that confers the right upon the individuals against one another, however the fundamental rights can be claimed only against the state. Therefore, it is generally assumed that fundamental rights are available only against the state which includes the actions of the state and against the officials of the state. Property right is a recognised right under Article 300A of the Constitution.The provisions of the Constitution pertaining to fundamental rights have no retrospective effect. The word retrospective means intending to take effect from the past date. All the existing laws which are inconsistent, they will be void after the commencement of the Constitution.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Articles 12 and 13 as the basis of Fundamental Right, blog by Ipleaders]Q.According to Article 12 of the Indian Constitution, which entities are considered the state for the purposes of Part III of the Constitution?

View answer

Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?

View answer

The Government has enacted a comprehensive and a more stringent new law, namely, the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 that has come into force w.e.f. 01.07.2015. Apart from prescribing more stringent penal consequences, this law has included the offence of willful attempt to evade tax etc. in relation to undisclosed foreign income/assets as a Scheduled Offence under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (PML

View answer

The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the right of an individual against forcible vaccination and the government’s COVID19 vaccination policy to protect communitarian health, but found certain vaccine mandates imposed by the State governments and Union Territory administrations disproportionate as they tend to deny access to basic welfare measures and freedom of movement to unvaccinated individuals. A Bench led by Justice L. Nageswara Rao said such mandates wilted in the face of “emerging scientific opinion” that the risk of transmission of the infection from unvaccinated individuals was almost on a par with that from those vaccinated. “With respect to bodily integrity and personal autonomy of an individual in the light of vaccines and other public health measures introduced to deal with the COVID19 pandemic, we are of the opinion that bodily integrity is protected under Article [X] of the Constitution and no individual can be forced to be vaccinated,” the court said. The court struck a balance between individual right to bodily integrity and refuse treatment with the government’s concern for public health. A person has the right under [X] to refuse treatment, it said. “Personal autonomy of an individual, which is a recognised facet of protection guaranteed under [X] encompasses the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment in the sphere of individual health,” Justice Rao observed.Q. Which of the following is not a COVID-19 vaccine?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following is consistent with the main argument of the above paragraph?a)If there is a significant amount of media coverage over a mass shooting, the elected government of the state is almost certain to pass gun safety measures.b)Among all the methods of homicide, gun related deaths account for a disproportionately high number of fatalities.c)The findings on mass shooting and its impacts suggest a complex narrative.d)With strong firearm bills, extensive media coverage, and a particular party in power, gun related deaths in the nation can be completely eradicated.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam