Question Description
Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Many of the ostensibly neutral American labour laws (e.g., licensing laws, minimum wage laws, and collective bargaining laws) were either directly aimed at stymieing black economic and social advancement or, if not so aimed, were quickly turned to that use. A huge swath of the American labour market was handed over to labour unions from which blacks, with few exceptions, were totally excluded. The now longstanding gap between black and white unemployment rates dates precisely from the moment of government intervention on labour's behalf.In short, the victories of American labour were the undoing of American blacks.Q. Which of the following would weaken the author's argument?a)The American blacks have never stated that the labour laws hindered their social and economic advancement.b)America didn't maintain records of unemployment rate among black and white labourers prior to introducing these labour laws.c)When these laws were introduced, the asset ownership in America was disproportionately in the favour of black American labourers.d)The labour laws mentioned above were not aimed at excluding any person out of their scope, black or white.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.