CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   There have been dozens of high-profile mass ... Start Learning for Free
There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.
Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?
  • a)
    Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.
  • b)
    Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.
  • c)
    Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.
  • d)
    Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decad...
The clue for this question is the sentence 'Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides.' The correct option has to provide a reason for this. Options (a) and b are illogical. Option (c) is not hinted by the passage.
Option (d) provides a valid reason for the possible influence of mass shootings. Hence, option (d) is the best answer.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

One of the most critical yet troublesome social policy questions is how many actually suffer because of labor market problems. Our social statistics, in many ways, exaggerate the degree of difficulty. Today unemployment does not have similar effects as compared to it in the 1930's. Then, most of the unemployed were primary earning member of their respective families, when income was usually at the level of subsistence, and when there were no social programs for those not succeeding in the labor market. Increasing affluence, arising out of increase in the families with more than single wage earner, the rising predominance of secondary earners among the unemployed, and new social welfare protection schemes have no doubt mitigated the effect of being without a job.Earnings and income data also exaggerate the extent of suffering. Among many with hourly wage at or below the minimum wage level, the overwhelming majority is from relatively well to do families having multiple-earners. Most of those taken into account by the poverty statistics either have family responsibilities or are elderly or handicapped which keep them out of the labor force, so the poverty statistics are by no means correct indicators of labor market indices.Yet, our social statistics underrate the degree of hardships in the labor-market in many ways. The unemployment counts do not include the millions of fulltime employed workers with wages so low that their families remain in poverty. Low wages and frequent or long time unemployment often cause lack of ability to support oneself. Because the number of people facing unemployment at some time during the year is many times the number unemployed across the year, those who bear the brunt of forced joblessness can equal or surpass average annual unemployment, even though only a small number of the unemployed in any month actually suffer. For every person included in the monthly data, there is one working part-time because of his incapability to find full-time work, or else outside the labor force but looking for an employment. Finally, social welfare schemes in our country have always focused on the elderly, disabled, and dependent, so that the unusual expansion of cash and in-kind transfers does not necessarily mean that those not succeeding are effectively protected.As a result of such contradicting evidence, number of those suffering seriously as a result of labor market problems is uncertain, and, hence, it is debatable if high levels of unemployment can be tolerated or must be countered by job creation and economic stimulus. There is only one unanimous agreement in this deliberation that the extant poverty, employment, and earnings statistics are not adequate for measuring the consequences of labor market problems, their primary applications.Q. Which of the following reflects the main idea of the passage?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.Nearly two thousand years have passed since a census decreed by Caesar Augusts became part of the greatest story ever told. Many things have changed in the intervening years. The hotel industry worries more about overbuilding than overcrowding, and if they had to meet an unexpected influx, few inns would have a manager to accommodate the weary guests. Now it is the census taker that does the traveling in the fond hope that a highly mobile population will stay put long enough to get a good sampling. Methods of gathering, recording, and evaluating information have presumably been improved a great deal. And where then it was the modest purpose of Rome to obtain a simple head count as an adequate basis for levying taxes, now batteries of complicated statistical series furnished by governmental agencies and private organizations are eagerly scanned and interpreted by sages and seers to get a clue to future events. The Bible does not tell us how the Roman census takers made out, and as regards our more immediate concern, the reliability of present-day economic forecasting, there are considerable differences of opinion. They were aired at the celebration of the 125th anniversary of the American Statistical Association. There was the thought that business forecasting might well be on its way from an art to a science, and some speakers talked about newfangled computers and high-fluting mathematical systems in terms of excitement and endearment which we, at least in our younger years when these things mattered, would have associated more readily with the description of a fair maiden. But others pointed to the deplorable record of highly esteemed forecasts and forecasters with a batting average below that of the Mets, and the President-elect of the association cautioned that "high powered statistical methods are usually in order where the facts are crude and inadequate, the exact contrary of what crude and inadequate statisticians assume". We left his birthday party somewhere between hope and despair with the conviction, not really newly acquired, that proper statistical methods applied to ascertainable facts have their merits in economic forecasting as long as neither forecaster nor public is deluded into mistaking the delineation of probabilities and trends for a prediction of certainties of mathematical exactitude.Q. On the basis of the passage, it can be inferred that the author would agree with which of the following statements?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.Nearly two thousand years have passed since a census decreed by Caesar Augusts became part of the greatest story ever told. Many things have changed in the intervening years. The hotel industry worries more about overbuilding than overcrowding, and if they had to meet an unexpected influx, few inns would have a manager to accommodate the weary guests. Now it is the census taker that does the traveling in the fond hope that a highly mobile population will stay put long enough to get a good sampling. Methods of gathering, recording, and evaluating information have presumably been improved a great deal. And where then it was the modest purpose of Rome to obtain a simple head count as an adequate basis for levying taxes, now batteries of complicated statistical series furnished by governmental agencies and private organizations are eagerly scanned and interpreted by sages and seers to get a clue to future events. The Bible does not tell us how the Roman census takers made out, and as regards our more immediate concern, the reliability of present-day economic forecasting, there are considerable differences of opinion. They were aired at the celebration of the 125th anniversary of the American Statistical Association. There was the thought that business forecasting might well be on its way from an art to a science, and some speakers talked about newfangled computers and high-fluting mathematical systems in terms of excitement and endearment which we, at least in our younger years when these things mattered, would have associated more readily with the description of a fair maiden. But others pointed to the deplorable record of highly esteemed forecasts and forecasters with a batting average below that of the Mets, and the President-elect of the association cautioned that "high powered statistical methods are usually in order where the facts are crude and inadequate, the exact contrary of what crude and inadequate statisticians assume". We left his birthday party somewhere between hope and despair with the conviction, not really newly acquired, that proper statistical methods applied to ascertainable facts have their merits in economic forecasting as long as neither forecaster nor public is deluded into mistaking the delineation of probabilities and trends for a prediction of certainties of mathematical exactitude.Q. The author refers to the Mets primarily in order to

Top Courses for CLAT

There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice There have been dozens of high-profile mass shootings in recent decades. The impact of these incidents can be devastating. First, mass shootings evoke large policy responses. A single mass shooting leads to a 15% increase in the number of firearm bills introduced within a state in the year after a mass shooting. This effect increases with the extent of media coverage. Second, mass shootings account for a small portion of all gun deaths, but have an outsized influence relative to other homicides. Third, when looking at bills that were actually enacted into law, the impact of mass shootings depends on the party in power.Q. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the impact of mass shootings on homicides as hinted by the passage?a)Because of mass shootings, the overall statistics of homicides in the country get skewed.b)Because of mass shootings, other gun related deaths are not given due coverage in media.c)Because of mass shootings, political parties are able to manipulate the voters.d)Because of the nature of mass shootings, the public reacts more sentimentally.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev