CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > A with intention to commit theft instigates B...
Start Learning for Free
'A' with intention to commit theft instigates 'B' to take possession of property of 'Z' from 'Z's possession. For this 'A' gives impression to 'B' that the property belongs to him. 'B' with the impression that the property belongs to 'A' takes possession of property bonafidely.
In relation to above statement
Statement (A) : 'A' is accused of abetment to commit theft and 'B' has not committed any offence.
Reason (R) : Abetter's liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.
In relation to above statement
Statement (A) : 'A' is accused of abetment to commit theft and 'B' has not committed any offence.
Reason (R) : Abetter's liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.
- a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)
- b)(A) is false but (R) is true
- c)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properly
- d)(A) is true but (R) is false
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of pr...
The given situation involves two individuals, 'A' and 'B', and their actions regarding the possession of property belonging to 'Z'. Let's analyze the statements and reason provided:
Statement (A) states that 'A' is accused of abetment to commit theft while 'B' has not committed any offense. This statement is correct because 'A' intentionally instigated 'B' to take possession of property that belongs to 'Z', thereby committing the act of abetment to commit theft. On the other hand, 'B' is not aware that the property belongs to 'Z' and takes possession of it in good faith, believing it to be 'A's property.
Reason (R) states that an abetter's liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender. This means that even if 'B' has not committed any offense, 'A' can still be held liable for abetment to commit theft based on their intentional actions. This reason is also correct because in the given situation, 'A' intentionally misled 'B' to believe that the property belonged to 'A', thus instigating 'B' to commit the act.
Therefore, both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct. Furthermore, reason (R) explains statement (A) by stating that an abetter's liability is independent of the principal offender's liability. In this case, 'A' is accountable for abetment to commit theft regardless of whether 'B' committed any offense or not.
Hence, the correct answer is option C: Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct, and reason (R) explains statement (A) properly.
Statement (A) states that 'A' is accused of abetment to commit theft while 'B' has not committed any offense. This statement is correct because 'A' intentionally instigated 'B' to take possession of property that belongs to 'Z', thereby committing the act of abetment to commit theft. On the other hand, 'B' is not aware that the property belongs to 'Z' and takes possession of it in good faith, believing it to be 'A's property.
Reason (R) states that an abetter's liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender. This means that even if 'B' has not committed any offense, 'A' can still be held liable for abetment to commit theft based on their intentional actions. This reason is also correct because in the given situation, 'A' intentionally misled 'B' to believe that the property belonged to 'A', thus instigating 'B' to commit the act.
Therefore, both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct. Furthermore, reason (R) explains statement (A) by stating that an abetter's liability is independent of the principal offender's liability. In this case, 'A' is accountable for abetment to commit theft regardless of whether 'B' committed any offense or not.
Hence, the correct answer is option C: Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct, and reason (R) explains statement (A) properly.
Most Upvoted Answer
A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of pr...
Explanation:
Abetment to commit theft involves intentionally encouraging or instigating someone to commit theft. In this scenario, A intentionally instigated B to take possession of Z's property by giving the false impression that the property belonged to A. As a result, A is accused of abetment to commit theft.
Statement (A) is correct because A's actions clearly fall under the definition of abetment to commit theft as per the Indian Penal Code.
Reason (R) is also correct because the liability of an abettor is independent of the liability of the principal offender. In this case, even though B took possession of the property believing it belonged to A, B has not committed any offence as he did so in good faith. Therefore, A can still be held accountable for abetment to commit theft, regardless of B's innocence.
Conclusion:
Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct, and reason (R) properly explains why A is accused of abetment to commit theft while B has not committed any offence in this scenario.
Abetment to commit theft involves intentionally encouraging or instigating someone to commit theft. In this scenario, A intentionally instigated B to take possession of Z's property by giving the false impression that the property belonged to A. As a result, A is accused of abetment to commit theft.
Statement (A) is correct because A's actions clearly fall under the definition of abetment to commit theft as per the Indian Penal Code.
Reason (R) is also correct because the liability of an abettor is independent of the liability of the principal offender. In this case, even though B took possession of the property believing it belonged to A, B has not committed any offence as he did so in good faith. Therefore, A can still be held accountable for abetment to commit theft, regardless of B's innocence.
Conclusion:
Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct, and reason (R) properly explains why A is accused of abetment to commit theft while B has not committed any offence in this scenario.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice A with intention to commit theft instigates B to take possession of property of Z from Zs possession. For this A gives impression to B that the property belongs to him. B with the impression that the property belongs to A takes possession of property bonafidely.In relation to above statementStatement (A) : A is accused of abetment to commit theft and B has not committed any offence.Reason (R) : Abetters liability is not dependent on the liability of the principal offender.a)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct but (R) does not explain (A)b)(A) is false but (R) is truec)Both statement (A) and reason (R) are correct and (R) explains (A) properlyd)(A) is true but (R) is falseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup