Several factors induced the makers of the Indian Constitution to choos...
- In the Parliamentary system of the government, parliaments can provide effective leadership during emergenc period and have played an essential function in the policy debate during crises, particularly in the discussion and debate about the types of economic measures that should be put in place to avoid economic collapse and personal hardship, and takes restrictive measures to choke off it. So, Option (a) is correct.
- Unlike the Presidential form of government, the parliamentary form of government is more likely to be unstable and the formulation of long-term policies is challenging and may not be effectively implemented, because, a change in the ruling party after the elections is usually followed by changes in the policies of the government. So, Option (b) is not correct.
- When the Constitution of India was written, India already had some experience in running the parliamentary system under the Acts of 1919 and 1935. This experience had shown that in the parliamentary system, the executive can be effectively controlled by the representatives of the people. So, Option (c) is correct.
- The makers of the Indian Constitution wanted a government that would have a strong executive branch, but at the same time, enough safeguards should be there to check against the personality cult. So, Option (d) is correct.
Several factors induced the makers of the Indian Constitution to choos...
Reasons for Choosing the Parliamentary System
The Indian Constitution's makers opted for a Parliamentary system due to several compelling factors. However, option 'B' suggests a reason that does not align with the actual motivations behind this choice.
Incorrect Choice: Continuity of Policy
- While continuity of policy is a desirable trait in governance, it is not a primary reason for adopting the Parliamentary system in India.
- The emphasis on continuity is more characteristic of a presidential system, where a strong executive leads to stable policies over time.
Effective Leadership in Emergencies
- The Parliamentary system allows for swift decision-making during crises.
- Leaders can mobilize resources and implement policies quickly, as the executive is derived from the legislature.
Experience with the Parliamentary System
- India had a history of functioning within a parliamentary framework during British rule.
- This existing familiarity made the transition smoother and more acceptable to the populace.
Checks Against Personality Cult
- The structure of the Parliamentary system inherently promotes collective decision-making.
- This system minimizes the risk of a single leader dominating the political landscape, thus preventing the emergence of a personality cult.
Conclusion
In summary, while the Parliamentary system does promote effective governance and checks against authoritarianism, the assertion that it provides continuity of policy is not a valid reason for its selection in the Indian context.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.